Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mole fraction conductivities

V, = molar volume of component i Xj, = volume fraction of component i Xj = mole fraction of component i l = conductivity of the component i in the liquid state A, = conductivity of the mixture in the liquid state... [Pg.135]

Example 30 Estimate thermal conductivity of a mixture of 0.23 mole fraction dimethylether (1) and 0.77 mole fraction methyl chloride (2) at... [Pg.412]

Any property of a reacting system that changes regularly as the reaction proceeds can be formulated as a rate equation which should be convertible to the fundamental form in terms of concentration, Eq. (7-4). Examples are the rates of change of electrical conductivity, of pH, or of optical rotation. The most common other variables are partial pressure p and mole fraction Ni. The relations between these units... [Pg.685]

Addition of co-solvents can also change the co-miscibility characteristics of ionic liquids. As an example, the hydrophobic [BMIM][PFg] salt can be completely dissolved in an aqueous ethanol mixture containing between 0.5 and 0.9 mole fraction of ethanol, whereas the ionic liquid itself is only partially miscible with pure water or pure ethanol [13]. The mixing of different salts can also result in systems with modified properties (e.g., conductivity, melting point). [Pg.262]

Figs. 31 and 32. Abscissas give the mole fraction of water, ordinates give the equivalent conductivity of HC1. [Pg.76]

The patterns of isotherms of the internal mobilities in binary systems consisting of two monovalent cations and a common anion could provide useful insight into the mechanism of electric conductance. The patterns may be classified into two types. In Fig. 2 the isotherms are schematically shown versus the mole fraction of the larger cation, Xj. [Pg.127]

FIG. 10 (Top) Mole fraction (x) of water in the continuous (toluene) phase as a function of acrylamide content, (wt%), for water, toluene, and AOT reverse microemulsions. (Bottom) Order parameter for disperse pseudophase water derived from mole faction data above. The and arrow at about 1.2% (w/w) acrylamide indicate the approximate onset of percolation in low-frequency conductivity... [Pg.262]

Ehase Inversion Temperatures It was possible to determine the Phase Inversion Temperature (PIT) for the system under study by reference to the conductivity/temperature profile obtained (Figure 2). Rapid declines were indicative of phase preference changes and mid-points were conveniently identified as the inversion point. The alkane series tended to yield PIT values within several degrees of each other but the estimation of the PIT for toluene occasionally proved difficult. Mole fraction mixing rules were employed to assist in the prediction of such PIT values. Toluene/decane blends were evaluated routinely for convenience, as shown in Figure 3. The construction of PIT/EACN profiles has yielded linear relationships, as did the mole fraction oil blends (Figures 4 and 5). The compilation and assessment of all experimental data enabled the significant parameters, attributable to such surfactant formulations, to be tabulated as in Table II. [Pg.310]

In view of the fact that our results are reasonably sensitive to the estimate of the bed porosity used in the analysis, these results are not bad. If one had employed a value of 0.3 or 0.5 rather than 0.4 for sB, jD would change significantly and this would have a major influence on the calculated concentration (or mole fraction) differences. Unfortunately, bed porosity data were not noted in the article cited. In an experimental program being conducted as an aspect of a reactor design, this parameter could easily be determined. [Pg.484]

The ionic conductivity of a solution depends on the viscosity, diffusivity, and dielectric constant of the solvent, and the dissociation constant of the molecule. EFL mixtures can carry charge. The conductivity of perfluoroacetate salts in EFL mixtures of carbon dioxide and methanol is large (10 to 10 " S/cm for salt concentrations of 0.05-5 mM) and increases with salt concentration. The ionic conductivity of tetra-methylammonium bicarbonate (TMAHCO3) in methanol/C02 mixtures has specific conductivities in the range of 9-14 mS/cm for pure methanol at pressures varying from 5.8 to 14.1 MPa, which decreases with added CO2 to a value of 1-2 mS/cm for 0.50 mole fraction CO2 for all pressures studied. When as much as 0.70 mole fraction... [Pg.430]

Figure 26.6 Wall conductive flux and surface fuel mole fraction (a) and NOa, near the surface (6) vs. the inverse of the strain rate for a stagnation reactor with the surface at temperatures of 500 K (dashed curves) and 1000 K (solid curves). The conditions of pressure and inlet temperature are the same as in Fig. 26.4... Figure 26.6 Wall conductive flux and surface fuel mole fraction (a) and NOa, near the surface (6) vs. the inverse of the strain rate for a stagnation reactor with the surface at temperatures of 500 K (dashed curves) and 1000 K (solid curves). The conditions of pressure and inlet temperature are the same as in Fig. 26.4...
It is expected that as the strain rate increases, the overall coupling between the surface and the gas-phase increases, since the flame is pushed toward the surface. Figure 26.6a shows the wall heat flux that can be extracted from the system, and the fuel mole fraction near the surface vs. the inverse of the strain rate for 28% inlet H2 in air, at two surface temperatures. The end points of the curves in Fig. 26.6, at high-strain rates, are the extinction points. The conductive heat flux exhibits a maximum as the strain rate increases from low values, which is at first counterintuitive. In addition, with increasing strain rate the fuel mole fraction increases monotonically, while the mole fractions of NOj, decrease, as seen in Fig. 26.66. The species mole fractions show sharper changes with strain rate near extinction, as the mole fractions of radicals decrease sharply near extinction. [Pg.436]

Figure 3.6-5 Change in the conductivity of [EMIM]CI/AICl3 ionic liquids with the mole fraction of cosolvent ( ) benzene or (O) CH2CI2 added to a 55.56-44.44 mol % [EMIMJCI/AICIj ionic liquid, and (O) benzene added to a 40.00-60.00 mol % [EMIMJCI/AICIj ionic liquid. Figure 3.6-5 Change in the conductivity of [EMIM]CI/AICl3 ionic liquids with the mole fraction of cosolvent ( ) benzene or (O) CH2CI2 added to a 55.56-44.44 mol % [EMIMJCI/AICIj ionic liquid, and (O) benzene added to a 40.00-60.00 mol % [EMIMJCI/AICIj ionic liquid.
The ionic conductivity of [C2CiIm][Bp4] was higher than of Li[C2QIm][BF4]. The high influence of water and ethanol on ionic conductivity was observed for Tallyl-3-methylimidazolium salt. The conductivity increases with an increase of temperature and the addition of water and ethanol. For example, the conductivity was changed from 3.82 mScm for pure IL at 293.15 K to 8.17 mScm for the mixture (IL + 0.3 water + 0.1 ethanol in mole fraction) [209]. [Pg.58]

The effect of the addition of water and molecular solvents such as propylene carbonate, N-methylformamide, and 1-methylimidazole on the conductivity of [C4Cilm][Br] and [C2Cilm][BF4] was measured at 298 K [211]. The mixture of the IL and the molecular solvent or water showed a maximum on the conductivity/mole fraction IL curves. The maximum for nonaqueous solvents was at the level of approximately 18-30 mScm at low mole fraction of the IL and the maximum for water was at level approximately 92-98 mScm [211]. The conductivity of a mixture of these two ILs depends monotonically on the composition. The temperature dependence of the conductivity obeys the Arrhenius law. Activation energies, determined from the Arrhenius plot, are usually in the range of 10-40 kj mol / The mixtures of two ILs or of an IL with molecular solvents may find practical applications in electrochemical capacitors [212]. [Pg.58]

In order to elucidate this point, viscosity measurements of living and deactivated PDMS solutions were performed In toluene, with Li+ + [211] as counterion. As no significant change was observed, It can be deduced that the fraction of aggregates Is negligible (< 1% for [C] 10 mole. " ). Moreover, conductance measurements made on model sllanolates In THF Indicate that the fraction of free Ions Is very low. In our system (benzene) we conclude therefore that the contribution to the reactivity from free ions can be neglected. Thus the main Ionic species are cryptated ion pairs, and... [Pg.296]

In order to conduct these analyses, the detection limit of the instrument must be known. The detection limit is defined (in ppm or ppb) as the concentration of analyte that allows a detectable signal to be measured with certainty - for example, three times the standard deviation of the background signal or the blank. If the volume of solution needed to obtain these results is known, the preceding values can be transformed to the absolute quantities or mole fractions (pico-mole, femtomole, etc.) that are needed to obtain the signal. In general, these values are excessively small because current instruments use excessively small volumes. [Pg.100]

Determinations of reduction potentials for a series of Fe(III) and Mn(III) tris-dithiocarbamate complexes by voltametry in the presence of various concentrations of polar molecules were conducted. The t y2 values varied linearly with the mole fraction of the particular polar molecule present (274). A theoretical model that was consistent with the experimentally derived f i/2 values was advanced. [Pg.386]

Another subtle case, where specific interactions may obscure the effects of Coulombic criticality, is ethylammonium nitrate (EtNH3N03) +l-octanol (Tcs315K) [85], In contrast to all other known examples, the critical point is located in the salt-rich regime at a critical mole fraction of Xc = 0.77. Electrical conductance data indicate strong ion pairing, presumably caused by a hydrogen bond between the cation and anion which stabilizes the pairs in excess to what is expected from the Coulombic interactions [85]. This warns that, beyond the Coulombic/solvophobic dichotomy widely discussed in the literature, additional mechanisms may affect the phase separation [5]. [Pg.10]


See other pages where Mole fraction conductivities is mentioned: [Pg.412]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.906]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.906]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.250]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.102 ]




SEARCH



Mole fraction

Moles mole fraction

© 2024 chempedia.info