Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molar mass melting temperature

Many of these salts melt or sublime before or during decomposition and reaction temperatures generally increase with molar mass. Thermal analyses for a selection of ammonium carboxylates have been given by Erdey et al. [915] who conclude that the base strength of the anion increases with temperature until it reaches that of NH3. Decompositions of ammonium acetate (>333 K) and ammonium oxalate (>473 K) proceed through amide formation. Ammonium benzoate and ammonium salicylate sublime (>373 K) without decomposition but ammonium citrate decomposes (>423 K) to yield some residual carbon. [Pg.203]

From the preceding discussion, it is easily understood that direct polyesterifications between dicarboxylic acids and aliphatic diols (Scheme 2.8, R3 = H) and polymerizations involving aliphatic or aromatic esters, acids, and alcohols (Scheme 2.8, R3 = alkyl group, and Scheme 2.9, R3 = H) are rather slow at room temperature. These reactions must be carried out in the melt at high temperature in the presence of catalysts, usually metal salts, metal oxides, or metal alkoxides. Vacuum is generally applied during the last steps of the reaction in order to eliminate the last traces of reaction by-product (water or low-molar-mass alcohol, diol, or carboxylic acid such as acetic acid) and to shift the reaction toward the... [Pg.61]

Note-. Bisphenol-A and the diaryl esters of terephthalic acid and isophthalic acid are nonvolatile compounds, so that any excess of these components cannot completely be removed, resulting in a low-molar-mass, unusable polyester. Moreover, excess bisphenol-A causes a strong discoloration of the polyester melt due to thermal degradation at the high reaction temperature used. This can be avoided if the diaryl esters are mixed with 5 mol% of diphenyl carbonate. Any excess of this compound can easily be removed in vacuum at the polycondensation temperature. [Pg.112]

The practical effect shown by this equation is that polymers become more difficult to process as their molar mass increases. For example, doubling the degree of polymerisation leads to an approximately ten-fold increase in melt viscosity. Fortunately, melt viscosity decreases with increasing temperature, so that in many cases the effect of high viscosity for higher molar masses can be overcome. However, there is an upper limit at which polymers can be processed without beginning to degrade so it follows that, at some point, a polymer cannot be processed from the melt at all. [Pg.79]

Unlike low molar mass liquid crystals, these materials do not undergo a nematic-isotropic transition. Instead, they adopt liquid crystal behaviour throughout the region of the phase diagram for which they are in the melt. Above a particular temperature, rather than adopting an isotropic liquid structure, they decompose. [Pg.157]

As a result of these dipole-dipole forces of attraction, polar molecules will tend to attract one another more at room temperature than similarly sized non-polar molecules would. The energy required to separate polar molecules from one another is therefore greater than that needed to separate non-polar molecules of similar molar mass. This is indicated hy the extreme difference in melting and boiling points of these two types of molecular substances. (Recall that melting and boiling points are physical properties of substances.)... [Pg.191]

The experimental inaccessibility of the configurational entropy poses no problem for the LCT, apart from a consideration of whether to normalize the configurational entropy per lattice site or per monomer in order to provide a better representation of experiment within the AG model. Once the appropriate normalization of Sc has been identified, t can be calculated from Eq. (33) as a function of temperature T, molar mass Mmoi, pressure P, monomer structure, backbone and side group rigidities, and so on, provided that Ap is specified [54]. The direct determination of Ap from data for T > Ta is not possible for polymer systems because Ta generally exceeds the decomposition temperature for these systems. Section V reviews available information that enables specifying Ap for polymer melts. [Pg.153]

Figure 22. The configurational entropy Sc per lattice site as calculated from the LCT for a constant pressure, high molar mass (M = 40001) F-S polymer melt as a function of the reduced temperature ST = (T — To)/Tq, defined relative to the ideal glass transition temperature To at which Sc extrapolates to zero. The specific entropy is normalized by its maximum value i = Sc T = Ta), as in Fig. 6. Solid and dashed curves refer to pressures of F = 1 atm (0.101325 MPa) and P = 240 atm (24.3 MPa), respectively. The characteristic temperatures of glass formation, the ideal glass transition temperature To, the glass transition temperature Tg, the crossover temperature Tj, and the Arrhenius temperature Ta are indicated in the figure. The inset presents the LCT estimates for the size z = 1/of the CRR in the same system as a function of the reduced temperature 5Ta = T — TaI/Ta. Solid and dashed curves in the inset correspond to pressures of P = 1 atm (0.101325 MPa) and F = 240 atm (24.3 MPa), respectively. (Used with permission from J. Dudowicz, K. F. Freed, and J. F. Douglas, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 21350 (2005). Copyright 2005, American Chemical Society.)... Figure 22. The configurational entropy Sc per lattice site as calculated from the LCT for a constant pressure, high molar mass (M = 40001) F-S polymer melt as a function of the reduced temperature ST = (T — To)/Tq, defined relative to the ideal glass transition temperature To at which Sc extrapolates to zero. The specific entropy is normalized by its maximum value i = Sc T = Ta), as in Fig. 6. Solid and dashed curves refer to pressures of F = 1 atm (0.101325 MPa) and P = 240 atm (24.3 MPa), respectively. The characteristic temperatures of glass formation, the ideal glass transition temperature To, the glass transition temperature Tg, the crossover temperature Tj, and the Arrhenius temperature Ta are indicated in the figure. The inset presents the LCT estimates for the size z = 1/of the CRR in the same system as a function of the reduced temperature 5Ta = T — TaI/Ta. Solid and dashed curves in the inset correspond to pressures of P = 1 atm (0.101325 MPa) and F = 240 atm (24.3 MPa), respectively. (Used with permission from J. Dudowicz, K. F. Freed, and J. F. Douglas, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 21350 (2005). Copyright 2005, American Chemical Society.)...
The HBA/HNA system provides a more suitable system for study, since it is prepared by melt polymerization of the two monomers and is far more stable at elevated temperatures compared to the PHBA/PET. The HBA/HNA copolymers are soluble in pentafluorophenol permitting use of NMR techniques to characterize diad sequences. In Fig. 13b,c the 13CNMR spectrum of the carboxyl carbon region of the HBA/HNA copolyesters of the 73/27 and 48/52 systems is shown [34]. Also shown in Fig. 13a,d are the spectra of 13C enriched HBA and HNA containing copolymers permitting unique identification of the diad sequences. As a result of this technique it was possible to determine the reactivity ratios of the two monomers by analyzing the 50/50 copolymer after polymerization to a molar mass value of 2000 [35]. Examination of the copolymer by 13C NMR showed the same ratio of monomers as in the starting... [Pg.236]

Spheres are obtained when the initial temperature is so high that the product is not completely powdery (approx. 30 K above the melting point). Fibres are obtained preferentially, when the molar mass of the PEG increases. The normal" configuration is the sponges. [Pg.608]

The morphology of a polyethylene blend (a homopolymer prepared from ethylene is a blend of species with different molar mass) after crystallisation is dependent on the blend morphology of the molten system before crystallisation and on the relative tendencies for the different molecular species to crystallise at different temperatures. The latter may lead to phase separation (segregation) of low molar mass species at a relatively fine scale within spherulites this is typical of linear polyethylene. Highly branched polyethylene may show segregation on a larger scale, so-called cellulation. Phase separation in the melt results in spherical domain structures on a large scale. [Pg.61]

Fig. 26 Critical molar mass of melt-crystallised linear polyethylene as a function of crystallisation temperature. Filled circles data for a broad molar mass sample with Mn=8500 g mor1, Mw=153,000 g mor1 of Mehta and Wunderlich [149], Open circles data for a sample with Mn=12,900 g mor1, Mw=108,000 g mol-1 from Gedde et al. [152]. From [91] with permission from Kluwer, Doordrecht, Netherlands... Fig. 26 Critical molar mass of melt-crystallised linear polyethylene as a function of crystallisation temperature. Filled circles data for a broad molar mass sample with Mn=8500 g mor1, Mw=153,000 g mor1 of Mehta and Wunderlich [149], Open circles data for a sample with Mn=12,900 g mor1, Mw=108,000 g mol-1 from Gedde et al. [152]. From [91] with permission from Kluwer, Doordrecht, Netherlands...
At high crystallisation temperatures, the high molar mass polymer crystallised alone. Data for the fold surface free energy obtained from linear growth rate data supported the view that the nature of the fold surface of the dominant lamellae was related only to the molar mass of the crystallising component and was not affected by the composition of the melt. [Pg.66]

In the wall thickness fluctuations up to 5 % may occur. As a result of the uneven temperature in the molten polymer during rotation, and also by the not always exactly reproducible rate of cooling, deviations in the dimensions of the finished product may amount to 5 %. Requirements are, that the materials can be molten completely, that the melt is sufficiently low-viscous, and that the molten polymer does not degrade too rapidly. Besides plasticised PVC, HDPE and LDPE are often used, as well as copolymers of PE such as EVA (ethylene - vinyl acetate copolymerj.Because the shear stresses in this process are extremely low, a narrow molar mass distribution is to be recommended, as discussed in 5.4. Cycle times vary between 3 and 40 minutes, dependent on the wall thickness. Cycle times can be reduced considerably by using machines with multiple moulds, since the cycle time... [Pg.200]


See other pages where Molar mass melting temperature is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.1076]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.888]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.37]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.288 ]




SEARCH



Melting temperature Melts

Molar mass

Molarity molar masses

Temperatur melting

© 2024 chempedia.info