Models linear elastic dumbbell model

Finite Extensible Non-linear Elastic Dumbbell Model... 

For example, a linearly elastic dumbbell model representation (Figure 13.19) of polymer molecules predicts Eq. (14) to apply, where X = /4H is a time constant and is the bead friction factor. 

Internal viscosity (Section 4) provides another possible source of shear-rate dependence. For sufficiently rapid disturbances, a spring-bead model with internal viscosity acts like a rigid body for sufficiently slow disturbances it is flexible and indefinitely extensible. The analytical difficulties for coupled, non-linear spring-bead systems are equally severe in linear spring-bead systems with internal viscosity. Even the elastic dumbbell with internal viscosity has only been solved exactly in the limit of small e (559), where e is the ratio of internal friction coefficient to molecular (external) friction coefficient Co n. For this case, the viscosity decreases with shear rate. 

It appears, then, that the mechanical degradation process is intimately connected with the molecular structure of the macromolecule and the resulting fluid rheology that arises from this structure. For a flexible coil macromolecule, such as HPAM or polyethylene oxide, the polymer solutions are known to display viscoelastic behaviour (see Chapter 3) and thus a liquid relaxation time, may be defined as the time for the fluid to respond to the changing flow field in the porous medium. It may be computed from several possible models (Rouse, 1953 Warner, 1972 Durst et al, 1982 Haas and Durst, 1982 Bird et al. 1987). The finite extendible non-linear elastic (FENE) (Warner, 1972 Bird et al, 1987a Haas and Durst, 1982 Durst et al, 1982) dumbbell model of the polymer molecule may be used to find the relaxation time, tg, as it is known that this model provides a good description of HPAM flow in porous media (Durst et al, 1982 Haas and Durst, 1982) the expression for fe is ... 

The results of the simple Hookean elastic dumbbell lack realism because they have only a single relaxation time. This is the chief virtue of the Rouse model (Rouse, 1953 Ferry, 1980). It consists of N beads connected by — 1 linear springs (refer back to Figure 11.4.1). Its rheological predictions are exactly the same as those in... 

Coppola et al. [142] calculated the dimensionless induction time, defined as the ratio of the quiescent nucleation rate over the total nucleation rate, as a function of the strain rate in continuous shear flow. They used AG according to different rheological models the Doi-Edwards model with the independent alignment assumption, DE-IAA [143], the linear elastic dumbbell model [154], and the finitely extensible nonlinear elastic dumbbell model with Peterlin s closure approximation, FENE-P [155]. The Doi-Edwards results showed the best agreement with experimental dimensionless induction times, defined as the time at which the viscosity suddenly starts to increase rapidly, normalized by the time at which this happens in quiescent crystallization [156-158]. 

---