Mixtures local interactions

The interaction potential model, originally proposed by Shan and Chen,37 and henceforth referred to as the S-C model, introduces k distribution functions for a fluid mixture comprising of k components. Each distribution function represents a fluid component and satisfies the evolution equation. The non-local interaction... 

In this chapter, the interaction-potential based two-phase LBM by Shan and Chen,henceforth referred to as the S-C model, is described since it has been primarily deployed in PEM fuel cell research. In brief, the S-C model introduces k distribution functions for a fluid mixture comprising of k components. Each distribution function represents a fluid component and satisfies the evolution equation. The non-local interaction between particles at neighboring lattice sites is included in the kinetics through a set of potentials. The evolution equation for the Ath component can be written as ... 

The reason for this behavior becomes clear if we regard miscibility as the result of a competition between the basic part of the osmotic pressure forces emerging from the translational motion of the polymers and the forces acting between the monomers. The osmotic pressure, which always favors miscibility, depends on the polymer density Cp, whereas the part of the pressure produced by the monomer-monomer interactions may be attractive or repulsive and is a function of the monomer density Cm- Since Cp/cm = 1/AT, the osmotic pressure part is extremely small compared to the effect of the monomer-monomer forces. Hence, mutual compatibility of two polymers, i.e. their potential to form a homogeneous mixture, is almost exclusively determined by the local interactions. Endothermal conditions are the rule between two different polymers, exothermal conditions the exception. Hence, the majority of pairs of polymers cannot form homogeneous mixtures. Compatibility is only found if there are special interactions between the A- and B-monomers, as they may arise in the form of dipole-dipole forces, hydrogen bonds or special donor-acceptor interactions. 

Moreover, in the same p>aper (Varela et al., 2009) the reduced surface pressure of IL-water mixtures was calculated assuming a pseudolattice structure in the bulk, and a localized adsorption scheme on the surface of the liquid employing the Langmuir isotherm. Thus, cations are assumed to migrate through the mixture and to be adsorbed on localized adsorption sites on the surface of the mixture. The interactions of cations with other molecules present in the system are treated in the Bragg-Williams approximation. Under these assumptions the calculated reduced surface pressure of the system was... 

Although the generalization to localized three-center bonds inevitably involves certain complications, important simplifications of the localized Lewis-structure picture remain. In the case of 3c/4e co-bonding, the corrections can often be adequately described in terms of two-term resonance between alternative two-center bonding patterns. In the case of 3c/2e T-bonding, the resonance-theoretic description (although possible in principle) becomes unwieldy. However, in terms of the single best three-center localized Lewis-structure description (or the resonance mixture of symmetry-equivalent structures), one can still identify specific localized donor-acceptor interactions (e.g., of type) that dominate the delocaliza-... 

---