Minimum temperature driving force

First, the TID is a temperature plot, not to scale, of all hot and cold streams to be analyzed. Two temperature scales are shown on the TID, the hot temperature scale and the cold temperature scale. A minimum temperature driving force, pre-selected by the designer, separates the hot and cold temperature scales numerically and this minimum temperature driving force is the minimum temperature difference between a hot and cold stream to be allowed on either end of a counter-current heat exchanger. Each hot and cold steam is represented on the TID as an individual arrow whose tail is the supply temperature and whose head is the target temperature. Figure 6.2 shows an example temperature-interval diagram with two hot streams and two cold streams plotted. 

Thus, the minimum value for UAext pQCp is about 5. If the heat transfer group is any smaller than this, stable operation at 7), , = 413K by manipulation of Text is no longer possible because the temperature driving force, AT = Tout — Text, becomes impossibly large. As will be seen in Section 5.3.2, the quantity UAext pQCp declines on a normal scaleup. 

Again, the heuristic anal5 is is close to the actual design. The fact that the minimum approach tenperature of 10°C has been violated should not cause too much concern, because the actual minimum approach is only 8°C and the heat exchanger is quite small, suggesting that a little extra area (due to a smaller overall temperature driving force) is not very costiy. 

By employing a minimum heat-exchange driving force of A T , one can establish a one-to-one correspondence between the temperatures of the hot and the cold streams for which heat transfer is feasible, i.e.. 

The type of spinodal decomposition encountered in IPN formation differs from the classical temperature quench in the sense that a composition change constitutes the driving force, at a fixed temperature. In this case, the rate of composition change is deeply involved in the phase separation process [6 ], which severely limits the applicability of current spinodal theory. In fact. Binder and Frisch [ ] which assume the polymerization rate is rapid enough to limit the phase separation. On the contrary, in the experimental work by Lipatov et al. [ ], the rate of polymerization was kept to a minimum to make the conversion changes during the phase separation minimal. 

The original eddy motion which sets up the chain of events leading to eruptions may be caused by forced flow of the bulk phases, density differences due to concentration or temperature gradients (B12), or earlier eruptions. Strong eruptions occur when a critical concentration driving force or a critical interfacial tension depression is exceeded (03, S8, S9). At lower concentration differences ripples may result (E4), eruptions may occur only over part of the interface (S8) with the jets taking some time to form (T9), or no interfacial motion at all may occur. Attempts to correlate the minimum driving force required for spontaneous interfacial motions have met with little success. 

Siloxane elastomers present an attractive alternative to the butadiene acrylonitrile elastomers most often used for epoxy modification. Poly(dimethyl siloxanes) exhibit glass transition temperatures well below those of butadiene acrylonitrile modifiers (minimum —123 °C vs. about —40 °C) and also display very good thermal stability13, 14). Other favorable and potentially useful attributes include good weatherability, oxidative stability, and moisture resistance. Finally, the non-polar nature and low surface energy of poly(dimethyl siloxanes) constitute a thermodynamic driving force... 

The maximum L G ratio corresponds to the case of minimum air rate. For a given temperature this occurs when the tower s operating line (line CA in Figure 6.1) intersects the saturation curve. For this case the driving force is zero and Ntu becomes infinite. The point of zero driving force may occur at the outlet point. Figure 6.2 shows the effect of varying L G for a crossflow tower. 

---