Miller and Strong method

Exceptions may be found to the above assumptions and consequently the method might be expected to be more limited than the de Forcrand method presented in Section 4.6.2.1. On the other hand, the de Forcrand method requires more data. Rouher and Barduhn (1969) indicate that better results are achieved with the Miller and Strong method when NaCl solutions are in the range between 5 and 15 wt%. 

Patil (1987) determined the hydrate number of simple propane hydrates to be 18.95 by the de Forcrand method using the Miller and Strong method he obtained hydrate numbers of 19.20,19.95, and 19.89 for NaCl solutions of 3,5, and... 

---