Michael addition enamine-activated

Later, the same group expanded this chemistry further by developing a cascade Michael addition/cross-benzoin condensation sequence of enolizable aldehydes 43 and activated enones 44 [27]. The reaction proceeded by means of enamine activation of aliphatic aldehydes to induce an asymmetric Michael addition to activated enones followed by an intramolecular cross-benzoin condensation (Scheme 9.30). Compared with their previous work, complex cyclopentanones with complementary substitution patterns were observed. Screening of the reaction parameters revealed that the chiral triazolium catalyst was necessary to ensure a satisfactory stereochemical outcome. Further mechanistic insights indicated that the high diasteroselectivity observed attributed to the secondary amine-induced epimerizing of the a-position of intermediate aldehyde 89. 

Oare, D. A., Stereochemistry of the Base-Promoted Michael Addition Reaction, 19, 227 Acyclic Stereocontrol in Michael Addition Reactions of Enamines and Enol Ethers, 20, 87 Okamoto, Yoshio, Optically Active Polymers with Chiral Recognition Ability, 24, 157. 

The majority of the Michael-type conjugate additions are promoted by amine-based catalysts and proceed via an enamine or iminium intermediate species. Subsequently, Jprgensen et al. [43] explored the aza-Michael addition of hydra-zones to cyclic enones catalyzed by Cinchona alkaloids. Although the reaction proceeds under pyrrolidine catalysis via iminium activation of the enone, and also with NEtj via hydrazone activation, both methods do not confer enantioselectivity to the reaction. Under a Cinchona alkaloid screen, quinine 3 was identified as an effective aza-Michael catalyst to give 92% yield and 1 3.5 er (Scheme 4). 

Barbas, one of the pioneers of enamine catalysis, has incorporated iminium ion intermediates in complex heterodomino reactions. One particularly revealing example that uses the complementary activity of both iminium ion and enamine intermediates is shown in Fig. 12 [188]. Within this intricate catalytic cycle the catalyst, L-proline (58), is actively involved in accelerating two iminium ion catalysed transformations a Knoevenagel condensation and a retro-Michael/Michael addition sequence, resulting in epimerisation. 

Scheme 6.104 Key intermediates of the proposed catalytic cycle for the 100-catalyzed Michael addition of a,a-disubstituted aldehydes to aliphatic and aromatic nitroalkenes Formation of imine (A) and F-enamine (B), double hydrogen-bonding activation of the nitroalkene and nucleophilic enamine attack (C), zwitterionic structure (D), product-forming proton transfer, and hydrolysis.

A number of conformationally restricted fluorinated inhibitors have been synthesized and evaluated. These smdies show that (1) subtle conformational differences of the substrates affect the inhibition (potency, reversible or irreversible character) (Figure 7.50), (2) a third inhibition process involving an aromatization mechanism could take place (Figure 7.51). When the Michael addition and enamine pathways lead to a covalently modified active site residue, the aromatization pathway produces a modified coenzyme able to produce a tight binding complex with the enzyme, responsible for the inhibition (Figure 7.51). ... 

The MacMillan catalysts (42, 45), the Jorgensen catalyst (51), and proline itself can promote Michael additions by iminium ion formation with the acceptor enal or enone (A, Scheme 4.22). Secondary amines can also activate a carbonyl donor by enamine formation (Scheme 4.22, B) [36, 37]. 

MacMillan s catalysts 56a and 61 allowed also the combination of the domino 1,4-hydride addition followed by intramolecular Michael addition [44]. The reaction is chemoselective, as the hydride addition takes place first on the iminium-activated enal. The enamine-product of the reaction is trapped in a rapid intramolecular reaction by the enone, as depicted in Scheme 2.54. The intramolecular trapping is efficient, as no formation of the saturated aldehyde can be observed. The best results were obtained with MacMillan s imidazolidinium salt 61 and Hantzsch ester 62 as hydride source. As was the case in the cyclization reaction, the reaction affords the thermodynamic trans product in high selectivity. This transformation sequence is particularly important in demonstrating that the same catalyst may trigger different reactions via different mechanistic pathways, in the same reaction mixture. 

The process mechanism as shown in Figure 2.23 consists of an initial activation of the aldehyde (66) by the catalyst [(5)-67] with the formation of the corresponding chiral enamine, which then, selectively, adds to nitroalkene (65) in a Michael-type reaction. The following hydrolysis liberates the catalyst, which forms the iminium ion of the a,(3-unsaturated aldehyde (62) to accomplish the conjugate addition with the nitroalkane A. In the third step, another enamine activation of the intermediate B leads to an intramolecular aldol condensation via C. Finally, the hydrolysis of it returns the catalyst and releases the desired chiral tetra-substituted cyclohexene carbaldehyde (68). 

A proposed mechanism for the Michael addition reaction is shown in Scheme 10.7. Note that enamine, generated from the reaction of hydroxyacetone and aldolase antibody 38C2, reacts with the activated methylene group in 2-(phenyl)ethyl-2-(tri-fluoromethyl)acrylate. 

Chen and coworkers have reported a new domino Michael-Michael addition reaction between a,a-dicyanoalkene [26] derived from cyclohexanone and benzyli-deneacetone, resulting in a stepwise [4 + 2]-type cycloaddition to afford almost enantiopure bicyclic adduct 15. In contrast to the completely inert function of secondary ammonium salt, a primary amine, 9-amino-9-deoxyepiquinine lo [27], in combination with trifluoroacetic acid, was found to be highly efficient in the activation of the a, 3-unsaturated ketone by tandem iminium-enamine catalysis (Scheme 10.21) [28],... 

The focus of this chapter is on the stereoselectivity of the conjugate addition of the Lewis acid and enamine Michael additions. Only donors that are formally enol equivalents are considered. Selectivity that results from preferential addition to one of the faces of an endocyclic enamine or enol ether as a result of the influence of a stereocenter in the ring is not emphasized. In general, the factors that control the stereochemistry in these instances are analogous to those active in the reactions of other electrophiles with such compounds. 

Factors Influencing the Stereocontrol in Michael Additions Proceeding via Enamine Activation... 

Nevertheless, as was pointed out before, a straightforward solution to the rather limited substrate scope of the reaction with regard to the ketone reagent and also a good way to overcome the lack of reactivity of ketones toward enamine activation has been the use of primary amines as organocatalysts. In fact, literature examples indicate that primary amines are much more active catalysts for the Michael addition of both cyclic and acyclic ketones to nitroalkenes compared to the same reaction using a secondary amine catalyst like most of the proline-based derivatives already presented before. 

A particularly difficult situation arises when combining in the same reaction the use of these rather unreactive acceptors such as enones with the incorporation of ketones as Michael donors in which the formation of the intermediate enamine by condensation with the amine catalyst is much more difficult. For this reason, the organocatalytic Michael addition of ketones to enones still remains rather unexplored. An example has been outlined in Scheme 2.22, in which it has been shown that pyrrolidine-sulfonamide 3a could catalyze the Michael reaction between cyclic ketones and enones with remarkably good results, although the reaction scope was exclusively studied for the case of cyclic six-membered ring ketones as nucleophiles and 1,4-diaryl substituted enones as electrophiles. In this system the authors also pointed toward a mechanism involving exclusively enamine-type activation of the nucleophile, with no contribution of any intermediate iminium species which could eventually activate the electrophile. Surprisingly, the use of primary amines as catalysts in this transformation has not been already considered. 

---