Methane, tris metallation

P-22 - Performance of bi-and tri-metallic mordenite catalysts for the lean SCR of NOx by methane... 

The first copper(I) complex of tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine ((760) tetrahedral) has been reported by Samuelson and co-workers. This group addressed the question of anion-controlled nuclearity and metal-metal distances in copper(I)-bis(diphenylphosphino)methane complexes, and in this endeavor they reported the structures of complexes (761) (Cu-Cu separation 3.005-3.128 A), (762) (Cu-Cu separation 3.165 A) and (763) (tetrahedral Cu-Cu 3.293 A). 6 They synthesized and provided structural evidence of oxy anion- encapsulated copper(I) complexes of this ligand. The complexes (764) (distorted tetrahedral Cu-Cu 3.143 A), (765) (distorted tetrahedral Cu-Cu 3.424A), (766) (distorted trigonal Cu-Cu 3.170A), and (767) (Cu-Cu 3.032-3.077A) were reported. They studied solid-state emission spectra of these complexes.567 During this pursuit they... 

Although the poly(pyrazolyl)borate complexes of iron(II) have been well known for many years, [1] it is only recently that the complexes with the tris(l-pyrazolylmethane ligand, HC(pz)3, [45-48] have been studied in detail. It should be noted that poly(pyrazolyl)methane ligands, such as the tris(l-pyrazolylmethane ligand, are neutral, whereas the poly(pyrazolyl)bo-rate ligands, such as the tris(l-pyrazolyl)borate ligand, HB(pz)3", are monoanions. As a consequence, the metal(II) poly(pyrazolyl)methane complexes are dications and often have quite different properties from those of the analogous metal(II) poly(pyrazolyl)borate molecular complexes. But, in spite of these differences there are often very close structural similarities between the dicationic complexes and the neutral complexes. Therefore the study of the pyrazolylmethane complexes will parallel that of the borate complexes discussed above. 

To make the transformation even more useful, different carbon electrophiles should be connected sequentially in a stepwise manner. For this purpose, a transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction opened the way. As shown in Scheme 22, cinnamyl chloride is treated with bis(iodozincio)methane (3) in the presence of palladium catalyst with various phosphine ligands. Phosphine ligands, having an electron-withdrawing group, such as tris[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]phosphine and tris(2-furanyl)phosphine, show excellent results47. 

Until the mid-1970s metal-catalyzed propylene dimerization had practical significance in isoprene manufacture. Goodyear developed a process to dimerize propylene in the presence of tri-n-propylaluminum to yield 2-methyl-1-pentene.16,95,96 This was then isomerized to 2-methyl-2-pentene followed by cracking into isoprene and methane. This and other synthetic pocesses, however, are no longer practiced since they are not competitive with isoprene manufactured by cracking of naphtha or gas oil. 

A requirement for an a/m-orientation of the hydridic p-C—H and C—metal bonds as in [10] is indicated by the reaction of threo-3-deuterio-2-(trimethylstannyl)butane with triphenylcarbenium tetrafluoroborate in methylene chloride at 24° which yields a mixture of 3-deuterio-l -butene, /ra v-2-deuterio-2-butene, and undeuteriated c/.v-2-butene as the major product (Hannon and Traylor, 1981). Comparison of the product distributions for the protio- and deuterio-stannanes yields primary and secondary isotope effects of 3.7 and 1.1 respectively. These reactions appear to avoid the complications of adduct formation between the triarylcarbenium salt and the hydride donor, but the preferential formation of the cw-2-butenes is not fully explained. The requirement for the anti-orientation is also shown by the relatively low hydride-donating properties of tris[(triphenylstannyl)methyl-methane (Ducharme et ai, 1984a) which adopts a C3-conformation with the P-C—H gauche to all three C—Sn bonds. In contrast, 1,3,5-triphenyl-2,4,6-trithia-1,3,5-tristannyladamantane, in which anti-orientations with respect to the bridgehead C—H bond are locked, shows high reactivity (Ducharme et al., 1984b). 

Tri-(2-quinolyl)methane does not form complexes, apparently because of steric hindrance from the third quinoline ring.10 For the same reason the alkali compounds of tri-(2-quinolyl)methane possess no (direct) bond between metal and N atoms like 12. 

Experiments in which introduction of bulky pseudofluorides to try to understand the way they might influence the chemistry of low-valent metals was described in Section 3.6 in respect of rhenium complexes. The same thinking has been applied in the case of osmium and the reaction of cf.v-[Os(CO)4Me2] with on the one hand, HF and on the other, HOTeF5 have resulted in methane elimination and the formation of m-[OsF2(CO)4] and c/.v-[Os(OTeF5)(CO)4Me] respectively [44]. This offers the promise that methane elimination from hydrides will be a useful route into other low-valent fluoro derivatives. 

---