Metaphysics definition

Discovery of the Periodic Table was rendered possible only after four decisive prerequisites had been achieved. These were (i) the abandonment of the metaphysical and occult notions of elements that typified the alchemical era (ii) the adoption of a modern and workable definition of an element (iii) the development of analytical chemical techniques for the isolation of the elements and determination of their properties and (iv) the devising of a means of associating each element with a characteristic natural number. The Periodic Table made its appearance on cue almost as soon as these preconditions had been fulfilled... 

Lisa Lloyd I disagree with what Professor Williams just said. I think that every time you use the word reductionist , I would have used analysis . I think that it is correct that scientists use analysis to break systems down, but I think of reductionism as being something else which is the complete description of entire systems in terms of entities at a lower level. That s the sort of standard philosophical definition of reductionism which has a lot more metaphysical and epistemological bite than does the kind of analytic method that you are describing. So I would want to distinguish between analysis as a method, a set of approaches that all scientists do use, and reductionism as a set of commitments about what the ultimate aims of science or of a scientific theory would be, which is explanation at the lowest possible level. Does that make sense to you ... 

When we say force is the cause of motion we talk metaphysics, and this definition, if we were content with it, would he absolutely sterile. For a definition to be of any use, it must teach us to measure force. Moreover that suffices it is not at all necessary that it teach what force is in itself nor whether it is the cause or the effect of motion. 

Macquer found in the four elements a convenient way to organize the great gains in the empirical knowledge of chemical behavior that had accumulated in the previous fifty years. Macquer s definition of chemistry is consonant with the iatrochemical tradition, but his constituent elements are different, and even though the four elements have names identical with the Aristotelian tradition, they were given an identity that was more operational than metaphysical. 

So what could M, the feature in virtue of which bodies have their geometrical attributes, be What, in other words, would a definition of body that somehow excludes mobility be In Metaphysics V 13, Aristode provides an answer to this question in his discussion of the category of quantity. 

Because Aristode s definition of body can be illuminated by focussing on the nature of peyeGoq, in the remainder of this chapter, I will leave peyeGoq in the definition of body rather than what could in principle replace it, namely measurable quantity . Hence, the definition of a body that emerges from book V of the Metaphysics is ... 

The differentiation of quality can be completed by interpreting Ar-istode as thinking that a quality is an order, or perhaps a principle of order, of that which has parts. Although Aristode does not explicidy define quality in this way, his definition of dispositions (8ld0e[Pg.118]

At this point the reduction has reached the level of philosophical discourse and shows remarkable similarity with the metaphysics of the 17th century mathematician and philosopher Rene Descartes. He argued that if the only thing that is clearly understandable in matter is mathematical proportions, then matter and spatial extension are the same. On this basis he rejected not only the idea of indivisible atoms but also of the void. Where there is space, there is by definition extension and, therefore matter, and hence the void is undefined. 

It should perhaps be stressed that tbe notion of chemical substances is completely different from the metaphysical concept of substance that figures in the philosophical tradition since Aristotle (Witt, 1989 Hoffman Rosenkrantz, 1994). As will appear, the chemical notion of substance is, at least as presented in this chapter, an empirical concept, whose referent is wholly defined in terms of laboratory procedures, and cannot be given an essentialist definition. 

In the application of IT, there is a recent and rapidly increasing tendency by many to use holistic to mean simply consideration of all factors for the patient, but nonetheless essentially meaning only those factors that are the focus of Western mainstream medicine. Presumably, this restricted use of the term is intended to give an air of establishment respectability, while the idea still confers a significant improvement on current healthcare. In contrast, everyday use of holistic continues to incorporate alternative medicine and the emotional, philosophical, metaphysical, and spiritual aspects of well-being. It would be very sad if this were lost from the definition. The goal of the traditional holistic approach is a wellness that encompasses each and every person in entirety, according their belief systems, and not just the lack of physical pain and disease (see, e.g., http //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holistic health), in complete accordance with the definition of health by the WHO as mentioned above and discussed below. 

---