Mechanisms separation, mathematical

Although evidence exists for both mechanisms of growth rate dispersion, separate mathematical models were developed for incorporating the two mechanisms into descriptions of crystal populations random growth rate fluctuations (36) and growth rate distributions (33,40). Both mechanisms can be included in a population balance to show the relative effects of the two mechanisms on crystal size distributions from batch and continuous crystallizers (41). 

Sweetsur and White (1974) showed that type B milk coagulates by a one-step mechanism and that type A milk coagulates by a two-step mechanism. Parker et al. (1979) proposed a separate mechanism for coagulation of each type of milk. Although their mechanism is mathematically sound and accounts for the physical observations, there is some difficulty in accounting chemically for what happens during coagulation. 

The solution to that problem presented itself as scientists developed a more complete understanding of quantum mechanics, the mathematical system that explains the behavior of particles at the atomic level. According to quantum mechanics, there is some finite possibility that the two protons can "tunnel under" the electrostatic barrier that would normally keep them separate from each other, permitting fusion to occur. The probability that such a reaction will occur is very low indeed. It takes place, on average, about once every... 

The result is that, to a very good approxunation, as treated elsewhere in this Encyclopedia, the nuclei move in a mechanical potential created by the much more rapid motion of the electrons. The electron cloud itself is described by the quantum mechanical theory of electronic structure. Since the electronic and nuclear motion are approximately separable, the electron cloud can be described mathematically by the quantum mechanical theory of electronic structure, in a framework where the nuclei are fixed. The resulting Bom-Oppenlieimer potential energy surface (PES) created by the electrons is the mechanical potential in which the nuclei move. Wlien we speak of the internal motion of molecules, we therefore mean essentially the motion of the nuclei, which contain most of the mass, on the molecular potential energy surface, with the electron cloud rapidly adjusting to the relatively slow nuclear motion. 

Transport Models. Many mechanistic and mathematical models have been proposed to describe reverse osmosis membranes. Some of these descriptions rely on relatively simple concepts others are far more complex and require sophisticated solution techniques. Models that adequately describe the performance of RO membranes are important to the design of RO processes. Models that predict separation characteristics also minimize the number of experiments that must be performed to describe a particular system. Excellent reviews of membrane transport models and mechanisms are available (9,14,25-29). 

An understanding of these LR dynamics requires both biological and mathematical insight. In this chapter we define these biological processes in terms of RG mechanisms and consider whether these processes reflect receptor in different states of activity. Next we develop a mathematical description to account for at least six separate processes (1) ligand association, (2) rapid ligand dissociation, (3) slower dissociation, (4) internalization, and (5 and 6) two different Interconversions among receptor forms. 

Molecular mechanics force fields rest on four fundamental principles. The first principle is derived from the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation. Electrons have much lower mass than nuclei and move at much greater velocity. The velocity is sufficiently different that the nuclei can be considered stationary on a relative scale. In effect, the electronic and nuclear motions are uncoupled, and they can be treated separately. Unlike quantum mechanics, which is involved in determining the probability of electron distribution, molecular mechanics focuses instead on the location of the nuclei. Based on both theory and experiment, a set of equations are used to account for the electronic-nuclear attraction, nuclear-nuclear repulsion, and covalent bonding. Electrons are not directly taken into account, but they are considered indirectly or implicitly through the use of potential energy equations. This approach creates a mathematical model of molecular structures which is intuitively clear and readily available for fast computations. The set of equations and constants is defined as the force... 

Only for a special class of compound with appropriate planar symmetry is it possible to distinguish between (a) electrons, associated with atomic cores and (7r) electrons delocalized over the molecular surface. The Hiickel approximation is allowed for this limited class only. Since a — 7r separation is nowhere perfect and always somewhat artificial, there is the temptation to extend the Hiickel method also to situations where more pronounced a — ix interaction is expected. It is immediately obvious that a different partitioning would be required for such an extension. The standard HMO partitioning that operates on symmetry grounds, treats only the 7r-electrons quantum mechanically and all a-electrons as part of the classical molecular frame. The alternative is an arbitrary distinction between valence electrons and atomic cores. Schemes have been devised [98, 99] to handle situations where the molecular valence shell consists of either a + n or only a electrons. In either case, the partitioning introduces extra complications. The mathematics of the situation [100] dictates that any abstraction produce disjoint sectors, of which no more than one may be non-classical. In view if the BO approximation already invoked, only the valence sector could be quantum mechanical9. In this case the classical remainder is a set of atomic cores in some unspecified excited state, called the valence state. One complication that arises is that wave functions of the valence electrons depend parametrically on the valence state. 

Mathematically, the movement of vibrating atoms at either end of a bond can be approximated to simple-harmonic motion (SHM), like two balls separated by a spring. From classical mechanics, the force necessary to shift an atom or group away from its equilibrium position is given by... 

A rigorous mathematical formalism of chemical bonding is possible only through the quantum mechanical treatment of molecules. However, obtaining analytical solutions for the Schrodinger wave equation is not possible even for the simplest systems with more than one electron and as a result attempts have been made to obtain approximate solutions a series of approximations have been introduced. As a first step, the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation has been invoked, which allows us to treat the electronic and nuclear motions separately. In solving the electronic part, mainly two formalisms, VB and molecular orbital (MO), have been in use and they are described below. Both are wave function-based methods. The wave function T is the fundamental descriptor in quantum mechanics but it is not physically measurable. The squared value of the wave function T 2dT represents probability of finding an electron in the volume element dr. 

---