Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Maximum electronic coherence

Figure 6.10 Ultrafast efficient switching in the five-state system via SPODS based on multipulse sequences from sinusoidal phase modulation (PL). The shaped laser pulse shown in (a) results from complete forward design of the control field. Frame (b) shows die induced bare state population dynamics. After preparation of the resonant subsystem in a state of maximum electronic coherence by the pre-pulse, the optical phase jump of = —7r/2 shifts die main pulse in-phase with the induced charge oscillation. Therefore, the interaction energy is minimized, resulting in the selective population of the lower dressed state /), as seen in the dressed state population dynamics in (d) around t = —50 fs. Due to the efficient energy splitting of the dressed states, induced in the resonant subsystem by the main pulse, the lower dressed state is shifted into resonance widi die lower target state 3) (see frame (c) around t = 0). As a result, 100% of the population is transferred nonadiabatically to this particular target state, which is selectively populated by the end of the pulse. Figure 6.10 Ultrafast efficient switching in the five-state system via SPODS based on multipulse sequences from sinusoidal phase modulation (PL). The shaped laser pulse shown in (a) results from complete forward design of the control field. Frame (b) shows die induced bare state population dynamics. After preparation of the resonant subsystem in a state of maximum electronic coherence by the pre-pulse, the optical phase jump of = —7r/2 shifts die main pulse in-phase with the induced charge oscillation. Therefore, the interaction energy is minimized, resulting in the selective population of the lower dressed state /), as seen in the dressed state population dynamics in (d) around t = —50 fs. Due to the efficient energy splitting of the dressed states, induced in the resonant subsystem by the main pulse, the lower dressed state is shifted into resonance widi die lower target state 3) (see frame (c) around t = 0). As a result, 100% of the population is transferred nonadiabatically to this particular target state, which is selectively populated by the end of the pulse.
The pre-pulse thus prepares the system in a state of maximum electronic coherence (see Figure 6.10b around t = -100 fs). Only 0.5% of the population escapes to the resonant target state 4). Transitions to the off-resonant target states 3) and 5) are completely suppressed since the dynamic Stark splitting of the... [Pg.259]

The graphs shown in Figure 5.9 illustrate the interplay between the oscillations of the probability to measure the system in the second electronic state (curve (C2)) and the loss of electronic coherences (curve (/ 2))- Indeed the latter function reaches a first maximum around 0.08 at t = 25 fs. Nevertheless decoherence has already completely occurred at that time, thereby damping the actual hopping probability. The curve reflects the contribution of each... [Pg.140]

The investigation of electron ionization is clearly in the early stages in comparison with the electron transfer studies, and additional work on the influence of orientation on Augmentation will be required before a coherent pattern emerges and a model for fragmentation can be attempted. However, a simple model that considers ionization in terms of the Coulomb potential developed between the electron and the polar molecule, taking the electron transition probability into account, reproduces the main experimental features. This model accounts qualitatively for the steric effect measured and leads to simple, generally applicable, expressions for the maximum (70 eV) ionization cross section. [Pg.31]

Figure 2. Franck-Condon windows lVpc(Gi, r, v5) for the Na3(X) - N83(B) and for the Na3(B) Na3+ (X) + e transitions, X = 621 nm. The FC windows are evaluated as rather small areas of the lobes of vibrational wavefunctions that are transferred from one electronic state to the other. The vertical arrows indicate these regions in statu nascendi subsequently, the nascent lobes of the wavepackets move coherently to other domains of the potential-energy surfaces, yielding, e.g., the situation at t = 653 fs, which is illustrated in the figure. The snapshots of three-dimensional (3d) ab initio densities are superimposed on equicontours of the ab initio potential-energy surfaces of Na3(X), Na3(B), and Na3+ (X), adapted from Ref. 5 and projected in the pseudorotational coordinate space Qx r cos Figure 2. Franck-Condon windows lVpc(Gi, r, v5) for the Na3(X) - N83(B) and for the Na3(B) Na3+ (X) + e transitions, X = 621 nm. The FC windows are evaluated as rather small areas of the lobes of vibrational wavefunctions that are transferred from one electronic state to the other. The vertical arrows indicate these regions in statu nascendi subsequently, the nascent lobes of the wavepackets move coherently to other domains of the potential-energy surfaces, yielding, e.g., the situation at t = 653 fs, which is illustrated in the figure. The snapshots of three-dimensional (3d) ab initio densities are superimposed on equicontours of the ab initio potential-energy surfaces of Na3(X), Na3(B), and Na3+ (X), adapted from Ref. 5 and projected in the pseudorotational coordinate space Qx r cos <p, Qy = r sin <p. A complementary projection along the Qs coordinate is presented in Ref. 4. The present FC windows are for X = 621 nm, and the time delay td = 630 fs used in the simulation corresponds to a maximum in the pump-probe spectrum cf. Refs. 1 and 4.
A dedicated STEM is an instrument that has no postspecimen lenses and images only in the scanning transmission mode. It is generally equipped with a field emission electron source, which is very bright and coherent allowing for maximum resolution (10). [Pg.79]


See other pages where Maximum electronic coherence is mentioned: [Pg.250]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.3146]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.11]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.250 , Pg.253 , Pg.255 , Pg.259 , Pg.262 ]




SEARCH



Electron coherent

Electron maximum

Electronic coherence

© 2024 chempedia.info