Matched/mismatched pair

When the allene moiety of 2,3-allenylamines was substituted with Br, an intramolecular nucleophilic substitution reaction led to a chiral 2,3-ds-ethynylaziridine 323. The diastereoselectivity depends on the absolute configuration of the allene moiety, i.e. typically for a matched-mismatched pair the S,aR-isomer afforded the product with much higher stereoselectivity [155, 156],... 

The first example synthesized was based on the AHPC structure with (S)-cy-clohexylethylamine in the side-chain. The use of the more sterically hindered (S)-cyclohexylethylamine in the side-chain increased the enantiomeric excess from 83% ee (with (Sp,S)-5a to 90% ee with (Sp,S)-5b (complete conversion). The other diastereomer, (Pp,S)-5b, resulted in 94% yield and 87% ee. The ligand pair 6b, which is based on BHPC with (S)-t-butylethylamine in the side-chain, resulted in a matched/mismatched pair. The (Rp,S) diastereomer gave a 98% yield and an excellent 89% ee, but the (Sp,S) diastereomer produced only a 25% yield with a moderate 42% ee. The diastereomeric pair 6c, also based on BHPC 3 with (S)-naphthalen-l-ylethylamine in the side-chain, resulted similarly in a matched/mismatched pair with high activity, but only moderate enantiomeric excess. 

Thought Experiments II and III on the Hydroboration of Chiral Alkenes with Chiral Boranes Reagent Control of Diastereoselec-tivity, Matched/Mismatched Pairs, Double Stereodifferentiation... 

Bisituselectivity is operative in double differentiation, double stereodifferentiation, and double asymmetric induction, and, has led to the terms matched/mismatched pairs. 

Diakowski and Kraatz also used [Fe(CN)g]" to study mismatches in a 25 base pair ODN hybridization experiment [144], The negative feedback was greatest for fully matched strands and least for mismatches near the ends of the strands. Their data were reported in terms of the effective rate constant describing the faradaic reaction at the substrate as extracted from feedback approach curves (Chapter 5). Interestingly, a threefold difference between the rate constants at various surfaces with matched/mismatched pairs was observed that was greatly increased to a factor of about 20-fold in the presence of Zn +. This effect is due to the modulation of the charge density of the DNA by the binding of Zn + [138] and appears to be a useful means to enhance the performance of such label-free DNA sensors. 

The stereoselectivity of reactions between optically active a-methyl-y-alkoxyallylstannancs and a-alkoxyaldehydes has been investigated with matched or mismatched pairings depending on whether addition to a chelated or nonchelated aldehyde is involved 121. 

If a chiral aldehyde, e.g., methyl (27 ,4S)-4-formyl-2-methylpentanoate (syn-1) is attacked by an achiral enolate (see Section 1.3.4.3.1.), the induced stereoselectivity is directed by the aldehyde ( inherent aldehyde selectivity ). Predictions of the stereochemical outcome are possible (at least for 1,2- and 1,3-induction) based on the Cram—Felkin Anh model or Cram s cyclic model (see Sections 1.3.4.3.1. and 1.3.4.3.2.). If, however, the enantiomerically pure aldehyde 1 is allowed to react with both enantiomers of the boron enolate l-rerr-butyldimethylsilyloxy-2-dibutylboranyloxy-1-cyclohexyl-2-butene (2), it must be expected that the diastereofacial selec-tivitics of the aldehyde and enolate will be consonant in one of the combinations ( matched pair 29), but will be dissonant in the other combination ( mismatched pair 29). This would lead to different ratios of the adducts 3a/3b and 4a/4b. 

Indeed, the combination of the aldehyde 1 with the (S)-enolate 2 delivers the diastereomers 3a and 3b in excellent selectivity (>100 1, matched pair ). On the other hand, a 1 30 ratio of 4 a/4 b is found in the corresponding reaction of the (2 )-enolate 2. Although the selectivity in the latter case ( mismatched pair ) is distinctly lower, the reliability of this chiral enolate 2 provides a degree of induced stereoselectivity which is sufficient for practical applications ( double diastereodifferentiation )29. The stereochemical outcome is largely determined by the chirality of the enolate in that the (S)-enolate 2 attacks the aldehyde almost exclusively from the Re-face whereas the (/ -enolate adds preferably to the Si-face of the carbonyl group in the aldehyde. 

These reagents were also examined with chiral a-substituted aldehydes. The allylbo-ration reagent dominates the enantioselectivity in both matched and mismatched pairs. 

Use of oxygenated stannanes with a-substituted aldehydes leads to matched and mismatched combinations.181 For example, with the y-MOM derivative and a-benzyloxypropanal, the matched pair gives a single stereoisomer of the major product, whereas the mismatched pair gives a 67 33 syntanti mixture. The configuration at the alkoxy-substituted center is completely controlled by the chirality of the stannane. 

As described hitherto, diastereoselectivity is controlled by the stereogenic center present in the starting material (intramolecular chiral induction). If these chiral substrates are hydrogenated with a chiral catalyst, which exerts chiral induction intermolecularly, then the hydrogenation stereoselectivity will be controlled both by the substrate (substrate-controlled) and by the chiral catalyst (catalyst-controlled). On occasion, this will amplify the stereoselectivity, or suppress the selectivity, and is termed double stereo-differentiation or double asymmetric induction [68]. If the directions of substrate-control and catalyst-control are the same this is a matched pair, but if the directions of the two types of control are opposite then it is a mismatched pair. 

Double stereodifferentiation This refers to the addition of a chiral enolate or allyl metal reagent to a chiral aldehyde. Enhanced stereoselectivity can be obtained when the aldehyde and reagent exhibit complementary facile preference (matched case). Conversely, diminished results might be observed when their facial preference is opposed (mismatched pair). 

Now, we examine the interaction of chiral aldehyde (-)-96 with chiral enolate (S )-lOOb. This aldol reaction gives 104 and 105 in a ratio of 104 105 > 100 1. Changing the chirality of the enolate reverses the result Compound 104 and 105 are synthesized in a ratio of 1 30 (Scheme 3-38).66 The two reactions (—)-96 + (S )-lOOb and (—)-96 + (7 )-100b are referred to as the matched and mismatched pairs, respectively. Even in the mismatched pair, stereoselectivity is still acceptable for synthetic purposes. Not only is the stereochemical course of the aldol reaction fully under control, but also the power of double asymmetric induction is clearly illustrated. 

S )-100b matched pair 96 + (R)-100b mismatched pair... 

In the case of (Z)-allylic alcohol 13, however, it takes 2 weeks to get product 14 in a ratio of 14 15 = 30 1 for matched pairs, while the epoxide 14 is obtained in the much lower ratio of 14 15 = 3 2 for mismatched pairs (Scheme 4 5). 

Additions of enantioenriched allenylzinc reagents to chiral aldehydes provide intermediates that can be employed in the synthesis of polyketide natural products. Matched and mismatched pairing of reagent and substrate can result in enhanced or diminished diastereoselectivity (Eqs. 9.132 and 9.133) [114]. 

As we will see below, the terminology "good-good" and "good-bad" or "bad-bad" is equivalent to the "matched" and "mismatched pair" of Masamune. 

List later applied this strategy to the 1,4 reduction of various acyclic and cyclic a,P-unsaturated ketones using the diasteriomeric salt 15 (Scheme 5.37) [66]. Notably, use of the opposite (S) phosphate counterion resulted in a matched/ mismatched ion pair combination, forming the same enantiomer of the product but in significantly diminished ee. 

An interesting example exists of variation of diastereoselectivity, due both to the nature and sense of chirality of the electrophile, and to the configuration of the 2-pyrrolidinemethanol auxiliary6. Thus, the use of epoxide 16 as electrophile leads to an unexpected reversal of the diastereoselectivity relative to that observed when the corresponding O-protected iodohydrin 10 is employed. Both of the electrophiles are chiral and therefore reaction of each with the enantiomers of 1-(l-oxopropyl)-2-pyrrolidinemethanol leads to different diastereoselectivities due to the fact that there is a matched and a mismatched pair of reactions. 

The origin of the third diastereomer produced, complex 12, is of particular mechanistic interest. The configuration at Ca of 12 is opposite to that of the other two products 10 and 11 indicating that the opposite face of the enolate 6 has been approached by the epoxide. Two possible alterations of the geometry of enolate 6 inay be invoked to account for this, adoption of the 5yn- -conformer or adoption of the anti-Z-conformer. Examination of the different structures shown reveals that the observed minor product 12 could arise from a matched reaction pair of the ivn-E-enolate and epoxide (Newman Projection G) or from a mismatched reaction pair of the anti-Z-enolate and epoxide (Newman projection I). The absence of diastereomer 13 strongly suggests that the minor product 12 arises from reaction of the. ryn- -enolate, underscoring the extreme reluctance of iron-acyl complexes to form Z-enolates on deprotonation (see scheme on p 955). 

Both the selectivity and the activity of the diastereomeric ligands, (Rp,S)-5a and (Sp,S)-5a, were nearly identical and both showed positive chiral cooperativity (there was no observation of a mismatched pair). Through introduction of a phenyl residue in the a-position of the side-chain as shown in ligand pair 6a, there was again a small matched/mismatched effect, which was not as strong as in the unsubstituted case in ligand pair 4a. Overall, we could derive a simple rule for the ligands ... 

A case of matched and mismatched pairs was observed in the reagent-controlled cyclopropanation of chiral allylic alcohols. When the chiral, nonracemic allylic alcohol was treated with one enantiomer of the dioxaborolane ligand, the anti diastereomer was... 

The observed high degree of selectivity is a result of the fact that substrate induction and reagent induction reinforce each other and are thus intensified. This is therefore a case of double stereodifferentiation.70 The two compounds constitute what is known as a matched pair. In a mismatched pair the two inductive tendencies would be in competition, and selectivity would be reduced... 

---