Many body perturbation theory MBPT

Wfc isOlvc thcisc cv udtiO lid ai id. tlic Ji Oblcill ia uvci. 

The majority of routine calculations in quantum chemistry are done with variational methods (mainly the Hartree-Fock scheme). If we consider post-Hartree-Fock calculations then non-variational [CCSD, CCSD(T)] as well as perturbational (among them MBPT) approaches take the lead. The perturbational methods are based on the simple idea that the system, in a slightly modified condition, is similar to that before the perturbation is applied (cf. p. 203). 

In the formalism of perturbation theory, knowing the unperturbed system and the perturbation we are able to provide successive corrections to obtain the solution of the perturbed system. Thus, for instance, the energy of the perturbed system is the energy of the unperturbed system plus the first-order correction plus the second-order correction plus. etc. ° If the perturbation is small then we hope the series is convergent, even then however, there is no guarantee that the series converges fast. 

---

Ei=i N F(i), perturbation theory (see Appendix D for an introduetion to time-independent perturbation theory) is used to determine the Ci amplitudes for the CSFs. The MPPT proeedure is also referred to as the many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) method. The two names arose beeause two different sehools of physies and ehemistry developed them for somewhat different applieations. Later, workers realized that they were identieal in their working equations when the UHF H is employed as the unperturbed Hamiltonian. In this text, we will therefore refer to this approaeh as MPPT/MBPT. 

There are three main methods for calculating electron correlation Configuration Interaction (Cl), Many Body Perturbation Theory (MBPT) and Coupled Cluster (CC). A word of caution before we describe these methods in more details. The Slater determinants are composed of spin-MOs, but since the Hamilton operator is independent of spin, the spin dependence can be factored out. Furthermore, to facilitate notation, it is often assumed that the HF determinant is of the RHF type. Finally, many of the expressions below involve double summations over identical sets of functions. To ensure only the unique terms are included, one of the summation indices must be restricted. Alternatively, both indices can be allowed to run over all values, and the overcounting corrected by a factor of 1/2. Various combinations of these assumptions result in final expressions which differ by factors of 1 /2, 1/4 etc. from those given here. In the present book the MOs are always spin-MOs, and conversion of a restricted summation to an unrestricted is always noted explicitly. 

The idea in perturbation methods is that the problem at hand only differs slightly from a problem which has already been solved (exactly or approximately). The solution to the given problem should therefore in some sense be close to the solution of the already known system. This is described mathematically by defining a Hamilton operator which consists of two part, a reference (Hq) and a perturbation (H )- The premise of perturbation methods is that the H operator in some sense is small compared to Hq. In quantum mechanics, perturbational methods can be used for adding corrections to solutions which employ an independent particle approximation, and the theoretical framework is then called Many-Body Perturbation Theory (MBPT). 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

Many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) for periodic electron systems produces many terms. All but the first-order term (the exchange term) diverges for the electron gas and metallic systems. This behavior holds for both the total and self-energy. Partial summations of these MBPT terms must be made to obtain finite results. It is a well-known fact that the sum of the most divergent terms in a perturbation series, when convergent, leads often to remarkably accurate results [9-11]. 

The reconstruction functionals may be understood as substantially renormalized many-body perturbation expansions. When exact lower RDMs are employed in the functionals, contributions from all orders of perturbation theory are contained in the reconstructed RDMs. As mentioned previously, the reconstruction exactly accounts for configurations in which at least one particle is statistically isolated from the others. Since we know the unconnected p-RDM exactly, all of the error arises from our imprecise knowledge of the connected p-RDM. The connected nature of the connected p-RDM will allow us to estimate the size of its error. For a Hamiltonian with no more than two-particle interactions, the connected p-RDM will have its first nonvanishing term in the (p — 1) order of many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) with a Hartree-Fock reference. This assertion may be understood by noticing that the minimum number of pairwise potentials V required to connectp particles completely is (p — 1). It follows from this that as the number of particles p in the reconstmcted RDM increases, the accuracy of the functional approximation improves. The reconstmction formula in Table I for the 2-RDM is equivalent to the Hartree-Fock approximation since it assumes that the two particles are statistically independent. Correlation corrections first appear in the 3-RDM functional, which with A = 0 is correct through first order of MBPT, and the 4-RDM functional with A = 0 is correct through second order of MBPT. 

This result represents the most important advantage of the particle-hole formalism. Many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) consists mainly in the evaluation of expectation values (with respect to the physical vacuum) of products of excitation operators. This is easily done by means of Wick s theorem in the particle-hole formalism. 

Although HF theory is useful in its own right for many kinds of investigations, there are some applications for which the neglect of electron correlation or the assumption that the error is constant (and so will cancel) is not warranted. Post-Hartree-Fock methods seek to improve the description of the electron-electron interactions using HF theory as a reference point. Improvements to HF theory can be made in a variety of ways, including the method of configuration interaction (Cl) and by use of many-body perturbation theory (MBPT). It is beyond the scope of this text to treat Cl and MBPT methods in any but the most cursory manner. However, both methods can be introduced from aspects of the theory already discussed. 

Next the results from the relativistic random-phase approximation (RRPA) and the many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), also shown in Table 5.1, will be discussed. Because both calculations include basically the same electron-electron interactions, rather good agreement exists, and it is sufficient to concentrate only on the RRPA model. 

Since the Dirac equation is written for one electron, the real problem of ah initio methods for a many-electron system is an accurate treatment of the instantaneous electron-electron interaction, called electron correlation. The latter is of the order of magnitude of relativistic effects and may contribute to a very large extent to the binding energy and other properties. The DCB Hamiltonian (Equation 3) accounts for the correlation effects in the first order via the Vy term. Some higher order of magnitude correlation effects are taken into account by the configuration interaction (Cl), the many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) and by the presently most accurate coupled cluster (CC) technique. 

Trucks GW, Salter EA, Noga J, Bartlett RJ (1988) Analytic many body perturbation theory MBPT(4) response properties. Chem Phys Lett 150 37 14... 

---