Mannitol, All

Effect of temperature The plasmid was exposed to 50 °C momentarily while in solution and for 2 h as a precipitate. Exposure of unprocessed pSV(J at 20°C and 50°C, in solution, in the dried form, and in solution in the presence of mannitol all resulted in near 100% recovery of the supercoiled portion. 

Mannide, XI1 Mannitol, All Mannose, Cl Manool, T34 Manoyl oxide, T34 Manthine, K6 Marasmic acid, T30 Marasin, XI Marcumar, A26 ... 

Adding a hydrogen or two to a sugar makes a sugar alcohol. The sugar alcohols xylitol, maltitol, sorbitol, and mannitol are all used as sweeteners in food. They are not absorbed well by the body, and they don t have as many calories as sugar. As with any... 

The checkers found that further hydrolysis of mannitol diacetonide can occur during the removal of solvent, and that removal of all acetic acid from the product was problematic. Residual acetic acid in the product complicates the next step. The procedure described reduces these problems. 

Support for this result was obtained from the taste of 1,5-anhydrohexitols, which, only for purposes of comparison, can be regarded as 1-deoxyal-dopyranoses. 1,5-Anhydro-D-glucitol (that is, the incorrectly named 1-deoxy-D-glucopyranose ) (14), 1,5-anhydro-D-mannitol ( 1-deoxy-D-mannopyranose or 2-deoxy-D-fructopyranose ) (15), and 1,5-anhydro-D-galactitol ( l-deoxy-o-galactopyranose ) (16) are all purely sweet, without any trace of bitterness. Furthermore, the complete absence of bitterness of 1,5-anhydromannitol (16) clearly indicates that the anomeric... 

In conclusion, the steady-state kinetics of mannitol phosphorylation catalyzed by II can be explained within the model shown in Fig. 8 which was based upon different types of experiments. Does this mean that the mechanisms of the R. sphaeroides II " and the E. coli II are different Probably not. First of all, kinetically the two models are only different in that the 11 " model is an extreme case of the II model. The reorientation of the binding site upon phosphorylation of the enzyme is infinitely fast and complete in the former model, whereas competition between the rate of reorientation of the site and the rate of substrate binding to the site gives rise to the two pathways in the latter model. The experimental set-up may not have been adequate to detect the second pathway in case of II " . The important differences between the two models are at the level of the molecular mechanisms. In the II " model, the orientation of the binding site is directly linked to the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme, whereas in the II" model, the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme modulates the activation energy of the isomerization of the binding site between the two sides of the membrane. Steady-state kinetics by itself can never exclusively discriminate between these different models at the molecular level since a condition may be proposed where these different models show similar kinetics. The II model is based upon many different types of data discussed in this chapter and the steady-state kinetics is shown to be merely consistent with the model. Therefore, the II model is more likely to be representative for the mechanisms of E-IIs. 

The rate law of Eq. (15) holds at all pHs, despite the fact that is strongly pH dependent (see below). Free radical oxidation chemistry (60) appears not to be involved in these Fem-TAML catalyzed oxidations to any detectable degree. The efficient hydroxyl radical scavenger, mannitol (61,62), when added over the concentration range (0.5-2.0) x 10 3 M has no effect on the rate. This peroxide oxidation catalyzed by 1 does not proceed extensively via the hydroxyl free radical serving as the reactive intermediate. 

Different preparative procedures have been shown to yield protein fractions which are able to catalyze different types of reactions with respect to their requirement of either NAD or NADP as coenzymes [cf. Eqs. (19), (20), and (21)]. In sera of mice poisoned by carbon tetrachloride we found polyol dehydrogenases catalyzing the oxidation of the following polyols (a) with NAD sorbitol, ribitol, mannitol (b) with NADP sorbitol, ribitol. Erythritol and mt/o-inositol were not attacked at all. Figures 8 and 9 show the results of these determinations performed at pH 9.6. In the NAD system sorbitol and ribitol are oxidized at exactly the same rate, while in the NADP system ribitol does not reach the rate of sorbitol. The ratio NAD NADP for sorbitol is calculated to be 4.20 and for ribitol 5.50. Mannitol is oxidized at 23% of the rate of sorbitol. 

This procedure describes the preparation and use of an effective chiral catalyst for the asymmetric allylation of aldehydes. A previous synthesis of optically pure 1-(phenylmethoxy)-4-penten 2-ol requires seven steps from D-mannitol.4 This procedure has been employed successfully with other aldehydes,5 and also with methallyltributylstannane5 (see Table). Catalysts prepared from (R)- or (S)-BINOL and Ti(0-i-Pr)4 at 2 1 stoichiometry have also proven useful in these reactions.The olefinic products may be regarded as latent aldol products between aldehydes and the enolate of actetaldehyde or acetone. In all cases examined thus far, enantioselectivity... 

---