Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Magnetic moments surface

This is a single-magnet system with a magnetic moment parallel to the radiation surface for magnetic materials. The relative magnitude of the magnetic field at maximum from the height... [Pg.879]

Double-magnet systems are the most convenient ones for transducers on non-magnet materials. In this case magnetic moments are the normal ones to a surface of the pattern and the opposite ones to the each other. The magnetic field fills the whole zone of the acoustic contact in such positions of... [Pg.880]

In neutron reflectivity, neutrons strike the surface of a specimen at small angles and the percentage of neutrons reflected at the corresponding angle are measured. The an jular dependence of the reflectivity is related to the variation in concentration of a labeled component as a function of distance from the surface. Typically the component of interest is labeled with deuterium to provide mass contrast against hydrogen. Use of polarized neutrons permits the determination of the variation in the magnetic moment as a function of depth. In all cases the optical transform of the concentration profiles is obtained experimentally. [Pg.50]

Alternatives to XRD include transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and diffraction, Low-Energy and Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED and RHEED), extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS), and neutron diffraction. LEED and RHEED are limited to surfaces and do not probe the bulk of thin films. The elemental sensitivity in neutron diffraction is quite different from XRD, but neutron sources are much weaker than X-ray sources. Neutrons are, however, sensitive to magnetic moments. If adequately large specimens are available, neutron diffraction is a good alternative for low-Z materials and for materials where the magnetic structure is of interest. [Pg.199]

For specimens where gradients in the ms etic moment are of interest, similar arguments apply. Here, however, two separate reflectivity experiments are performed in which the incident neutrons are polarized parallel and perpendicular to the surfiice of the specimen. Combining reflectivity measurements under these two polarization conditions in a manner similar to that for the unpolarized case permits the determination of the variation in the magnetic moments of components parallel and perpendicular to the film surface. This is discussed in detail by Felcher et al. and the interested reader is referred to the literature. [Pg.664]

In the Introduction the problem of construction of a theoretical model of the metal surface was briefly discussed. If a model that would permit the theoretical description of the chemisorption complex is to be constructed, one must decide which type of the theoretical description of the metal should be used. Two basic approaches exist in the theory of transition metals (48). The first one is based on the assumption that the d-elec-trons are localized either on atoms or in bonds (which is particularly attractive for the discussion of the surface problems). The other is the itinerant approach, based on the collective model of metals (which was particularly successful in explaining the bulk properties of metals). The choice between these two is not easy. Even in contemporary solid state literature the possibility of d-electron localization is still being discussed (49-51). Examples can be found in the literature that discuss the following problems high cohesion energy of transition metals (52), their crystallographic structure (53), magnetic moments of the constituent atoms in alloys (54), optical and photoemission properties (48, 49), and plasma oscillation losses (55). [Pg.65]

To treat the orientational structure of the monolayer formed by 02 molecules on a graphite surface, allowance must be made for the fact that an oxygen molecule is characterized not only by a nonzero magnetic moment but also by a record small quadrupole moment, so that dispersion interactions prevail over quadrupole interactions at intermolecular distances shorter than 10 A.79 In addition, the adsorbate lattice parameters give rise to very small minimum intermolecular distances, a 3.3 A, the parameter b 8.1 A markedly exceeding the values a. That is why, it is sufficient to consider only the nearest-neighbor interactions in a... [Pg.38]

Table 1.1 Conjugate pairs of variables in work terms for the fundamental equation for the internal energy U. Here/is force of elongation, Z is length in the direction of the force, <7 is surface tension, As is surface area, , is the electric potential of the phase containing species i, qi is the contribution of species i to the electric charge of a phase, E is electric field strength, p is the electric dipole moment of the system, B is magnetic field strength (magnetic flux density), and m is the magnetic moment of the system. The dots indicate scalar products of vectors. Table 1.1 Conjugate pairs of variables in work terms for the fundamental equation for the internal energy U. Here/is force of elongation, Z is length in the direction of the force, <7 is surface tension, As is surface area, <Z>, is the electric potential of the phase containing species i, qi is the contribution of species i to the electric charge of a phase, E is electric field strength, p is the electric dipole moment of the system, B is magnetic field strength (magnetic flux density), and m is the magnetic moment of the system. The dots indicate scalar products of vectors.
The magnetic moments of the Ni clusters are dominated by the contribution from surface atoms.48,69 The analysis of Wan et al. indicates that the orbital and spin local moments of cluster atoms with atomic coordination 8 or larger are similar to those in the bulk (p spin 0.55 and orb 0.05 pB) 73 that is, the orbital moment is almost quenched for internal cluster atoms. In contrast, there is a large enhancement of the spin and orbital moments for atoms with coordination less than 8. This enhancement increases with the coordination deficit, and it is larger for the orbital moment. Wan et al.48 also analyzed the quantum confinement effect proposed by Fujima and Yamaguchi,56 i.e., the... [Pg.224]

If quark matter is in the ferromagnetic phase, it may produce the dipolar magnetic field by their magnetic moment. Since the total magnetic dipole moment Mq should be simply given as Mq = fjq (47t/3 rq)nq for the quark sphere with the quark core radius rq and the quark number density nq. Then the dipolar magnetic field at the star surface R takes the maximal strength at the poles,... [Pg.259]

The Hamiltonian of a single isolated nanoparticle consists of the magnetic anisotropy (which creates preferential directions of the magnetic moment orientation) and the Zeeman energy (which is the interaction energy between the magnetic moment and an external field). In the ensembles, the nanoparticles are supposed to be well separated by a nonconductive medium [i.e., a ferrofluid in which the particles are coated with a surfactant (surface-active agent)]. The... [Pg.194]


See other pages where Magnetic moments surface is mentioned: [Pg.586]    [Pg.2224]    [Pg.2396]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.734]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.250]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.766 ]




SEARCH



Magnet moment

Magnetic moments

Surface moment

Surfaces magnetic

© 2024 chempedia.info