LMTO methods

The LMTO method [58, 79] can be considered to be the linear version of the KKR teclmique. According to official LMTO historians, the method has now reached its third generation [79] the first starting with Andersen in 1975 [58], the second connnonly known as TB-LMTO. In the LMTO approach, the wavefimction is expanded in a basis of so-called muffin-tin orbitals. These orbitals are adapted to the potential by constmcting them from solutions of the radial Scln-ddinger equation so as to fomi a minimal basis set. Interstitial properties are represented by Hankel fiinctions, which means that, in contrast to the LAPW teclmique, the orbitals are localized in real space. The small basis set makes the method fast computationally, yet at the same time it restricts the accuracy. The localization of the basis fiinctions diminishes the quality of the description of the wavefimction in die interstitial region. 

The LMTO method is the fastest among the all-electron methods mentioned here due to the small basis size. The accuracy of the general potential teclmique can be high, but LAPW results remain the gold standard . 

Tank R W and Arcangell C 2000 An Introduction to the third-generation LMTO method Status Solid B 217 89... 

We have used the multisublattice generalization of the coherent potential approximation (CPA) in conjunction with the Linear-MufRn-Tin-Orbital (LMTO) method in the atomic sphere approximation (ASA). The LMTO-ASA is based on the work of Andersen and co-workers and the combined technique allows us to treat all phases on equal footing. To treat itinerant magnetism we have employed for the local spin density approximation (LSDA) the Vosko-Wilk-Nusair parameterization". 

H.L. Skriver, The LMTO Method (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984). 

Theoretical calculations were performed with the linear muffin tin orbital (LMTO) method and the local density approximation for exchange and correlation. This method was used in combination with supercell models containing up to 16 atoms to calculate the DOS. The LMTO calculations are run self consistently and the DOS obtained are combined with the matrix elements for the transitions from initial to final states as described in detail elsewhere (Botton et al., 1996a) according to the method described by Vvedensky (1992). A comparison is also made between spectra calculated for some of the B2 compounds using the Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (KKR) method. 

Calculations were done with a full-potential version of the LMTO method with nonoverlapping spheres. The contributions from the interstitial region were accounted for by expanding the products of Hankel functions in a series of atom-ce- -ered Hankels of three different kinetic energies. The corrected tetrahedron method was used for Brillouin zone integration. Electronic exchange and correlation contributions to the total energy were obtained from the local-density functional calculated by Ceperley and Alder " and parametrized by Vosko, Wilk, and Nusair. ... 

Fig. 5. Relaxed structure of the ordered twin with APB type displacement, (a) Flnnls-Slnclalr type potentials, (b) Full-potential LMTO method.

Fig. 7. Maps of the electronic charge density in the (110) planes In the ordered twin with (111) APB type displacement. The hatched areas correspond to the charge density higher than 0.03 electrons per cubic Bohr. The charge density differences between two successive contours of the constant charge density are 0.005 electrons per cubic Bohr. Atoms in the two successive (1 10) planes are denoted as Til, All, and T12, A12, respectively, (a) Structure calculated using the Finnis-Sinclair type potential, (b) Structure calculated using the full-potential LMTO method.

In the perfect lattice the dominant feature of the electron distribution is the formation of the covalent, directional bond between Ti atoms produced by the electrons associated with d-orbitals. The concentration of charge between adjacent A1 atoms corresponds to p and py electrons, but these electrons are spatially more dispersed than the d-electrons between titanium atoms. Significantly, there is no indication of a localized charge build-up between adjacent Ti and A1 atoms (Fu and Yoo 1990 Woodward, et al. 1991 Song, et al. 1994). The charge densities in (110) planes are shown in Fig. 7a and b for the structures relaxed using the Finnis-Sinclair type potentials and the full-potential LMTO method, respectively. 

Fig. 7.15 Calculated (with FP-LMTO method) electron densities plotted versus measured isomer shifts (not corrected for SOD) (from [32])...

Figure 14 The left hand side shows the band structures of poly(pyridine) calculated using a DFT-LMTO method for helical polymers. The right hand side shows its calculated density of states spectrum (solid line) and the experimental UPS spectrum (dashed line). The UPS spectrum was taken from Miyamae et al. [104]. Reproduced with permission from Vaschetto et al. [103], Figure 6. Copyright 1997 the American Chemical Society.

A different approach was taken by Hao and Cooper (1994), who used a combination of the him linear muffin-tin orbital (LMTO) method and an ab initio molecular quantum cluster method, to investigate S02 adsorption on a Cu monolayer supported by 7—AI2O3. Emphasis here was on the geometry of adsorption sites, with the conclusion that the preferred adsorption site is the Al—Al bridging one. 

Self-consistent energy band calculations have now been made through the LMTO method for all of the NaCl-type actinide pnictides and chalcogenides . The equation of state is derived quite naturally from these calculations through the pressure formula extended to the case of compounds . The theoretical lattice parameter is then given by the condition of zero pressure. 

In this paper we present preliminary results of an ab-initio study of quantum diffusion in the crystalline a-AlMnSi phase. The number of atoms in the unit cell (138) is sufficiently small to permit computation with the ab-initio Linearized Muffin Tin Orbitals (LMTO) method and provides us a good starting model. Within the Density Functional Theory (DFT) [15,16], this approach has still limitations due to the Local Density Approximation (LDA) for the exchange-correlation potential treatment of electron correlations and due to the approximation in the solution of the Schrodinger equation as explained in next section. However, we believe that this starting point is much better than simplified parametrized tight-binding like s-band models. 

Electronic structure determinations have been performed using the self-consistent LMTO method in the Atomic Sphere Approximation (ASA). 

---