Limitations of XPS

SRPES allows one to tune the photon energy to the desired surface sensitivity within the limits of XPS. As the mean inelastic scattering length for photoelectrons... 

The HEMA grafting was proved by means of spectroscopic methods with different informational depths. The elemental composition of the PES surface grafted with HEMA determined by XPS shows a content of sulfur of 0.6%. This value falls within the detection limits of XPS and points to the fact that an approximately 10 nm thick hydrogel layer of PHEMA is formed on the PES surface. 

Performance of XPS and AES. In NanoS Guide 2007. Weinheim, Germany Wiley-VGH, 2007. A lucid and readable presentation of the principles, capabilities, and limitations of XPS and AES based on actual applications and comparisons with methods such as scanning electron microscopy. 

The limitations of XPS regarding the investigation of multicomponent films were highlighted. 

Owing to the limited escape depth of photoelectrons, the surface sensitivity of XPS can be enlianced by placing the analyser at an angle to the surface nonnal (the so-called take-off angle of the photoelectrons). This can be used to detemiine the thickness of homogeneous overlayers on a substrate. 

Angyal and Angyal measured the pK of 2-aminothiazoles and 2-imino-4-thiazolines to obtain the protomeric equilibrium constants (Scheme l4) (74). The higher pK values of the imino derivative (9.65) compared with that of 2-aminothiazole (5.68) prove that the amino form is highly predominant, Xp = 2x 10" (72), The limitations of such a method of Kp determination are discussed by Elguero. Marzin and Katntzky in a review of protomeric equilibria in heterocycles (75). 

Xps is a surface sensitive technique as opposed to a bulk technique because electrons caimot travel very far in soHds without undergoing energy loss. Thus, even though the incident x-rays penetrate the sample up to relatively large depths, the depth from which the electron information is obtained is limited by the "escape depth" of the photoemitted electrons. This surface sensitivity of xps is quantitatively defined by the inelastic mean free path parameter which is given the symbol X. This parameter is defined to be the distance an electron travels before engaging in an interaction in which it experiences an energy loss. 

The primary drawback to the application of XPS in adhesion science is associated with the limited spatial resolution of the technique. This can make it difficult to study processes that are highly localized, such as corrosion, or to accurately characterize certain types of failure surfaces where, for example, the locus of failure may pass back and forth between two phases. 

Unfortunately, only thin films of about 20 nanometers in thickness could be obtained with Gel4 An ex situ analysis was difficult, because of experimental limitations, but XPS clearly showed that elemental Ge was also obtained, besides... 

Without essential limitation of generality it may be assumed that the orientation of the molecule and its angular momentum are changed by collision independently, therefore F(JU Ji+, gt) = f (Jt, Ji+i)ip(gi). At the same time the functions /(/ , Ji+ ) and xp(gi) have common variables. There are two reasons for this. First, it may be due to the fact that the angle between / and u must be conserved for linear rotators for any transformation. Second, a transformation T includes rotation of the reference system by an angle sufficient to combine axis z with vector /. After substitution of (A7.16) and (A7.14) into (A7.13), one has to integrate over those variables from the set g , which are not common with the arguments of the function / (/ , /j+i). As a result, in the MF operator T becomes the same for all i and depends on the moments of tp as parameters. 

The closed-loop pole "runs" from the point s = — l/xp at the mathematical limit of Kc = 0 to the point s = -l/xD as Kc approaches infinity. 

In order to detect possible impurities or doping agents at rather low concentrations the SIMS method should be chosen. Compared to XPS the detection limit of SIMS is... 

Fig. 4. Securing the lower limit of the calibration curve. The calibration range is from X (lower limit concentration) to X2 (upper limit concentration). The calculated value of Xp (p = 0.05) must be

---