Likelihood ratio, derivation

Liao (2000) derived a test statistic for single dispersion effects in 2" k designs. He applied the generalized likelihood ratio test for a normal model to the residuals after fitting a location model, which results in Bartlett s (1937) classical test for comparing variances in one-way layouts. The test is then applied, in turn, to compare the variances at the two levels of each of the k experimental factors. We caution that the test statistic (equation (3) in Liao) is written incorrectly. 

The generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) for the model 3 was derived in, given... 

Figures 27.1 and 27.2 illustrate that the distribution of CDio for a single chemical within a species is consistent with lognormal, and the previous section has examined the extrapolation of the median of that lognormal distribution between species. The analyses used to derive the median and In(GSD) of the CDio distribution may be extended to test hypotheses about the intraspecies variation (see Section 27.8.3). First, examination of data like those in Figure 27.1 indicates that the within-species In(GSD) is not the same for all chemicals, and a likelihood ratio test confirms this observation (p < 10 °° on 771 degrees of freedom). Moreover, the In(GSD) is not the same for all chemicals within each species separately (p < 10 on 669 degrees of freedom), nor is the In(GSD) the same for all three species for each chemical individually (p = 4 X 10 on 182 degrees of freedom).

Related to the F-test is the likelihood ratio test, which derives from the Neyman Pearson test. Likelihoods and log-likelihoods are discussed in the appendix of the book. Given two nested models estimated using maximum likelihood, the full model having f-parameters with likelihood Lf and the reduced model having r-parameters with likelihood Lr, such that f > r, then the general likelihood ratio test is... 

Decision theory operates on the basis of an "objective function" which is in some way optimized through the setting of a decision threshold. A lucid presentation to alternative strategies for formulating detection decisions has been given by Liteanu and Rica (S, p. 192). The essence of the matter is that a threshold value kg for the Likelihood Ratio is derived from a) prior probabilities for the null and alternative hypotheses, b) a cost or... 

The Monte Carlo sampling approach to derivative estimation introduced in Section 3.3 does not work if the function G(-, oi) is discontinuous or if the corresponding probability distribution also depends on decision variables. In this section we discuss an alternative approach to derivative estimation known as the likelihood ratio (or score function) method. 

Here is a chosen pdf, z is a random vector having pdf , and L x, z) = f Z + Tx)/likelihood ratio function. It can be shown by duality arguments of linear programming that G(-) is a piecewise Unear convex function. Therefore, Q(x, h) is piecewise constant and discontinuous, and hence second order derivatives of tf[Q(x, h)] cannot be taken inside the expected vrilue. On the other hand, the likelihood ratio function is as smooth as the pdf /( ). Therefore, if /( ) is twice differentiable, then the second order derivatives can be taken inside the expected vrilue in the right-hand side of (30), and consequently the second order derivatives of tf[Q(x, h)] can be consistently estimated by a sample average. 

The exact likelihood ratio test of the scale hypothesis (1) has been derived and studied in (Stehlik (2007)) and (Stehlik (2009)). 

Risk assessment for any given environmental compartment is a comparison of the PEC with the PNEC, i.e., the PEC PNEC ratio. If this ratio is below 1, there is no immediate concern. If the ratio is above 1, the assessor decides on the basis of its value and other relevant factors what conclusions apply. If it has not been possible to derive a PEC/PNEC ratio, the risk assessment is a qualitative evaluation of the likelihood that an adverse effect will occur. 

It should be noted that MOS ratios are no absolute measure of risks. Nobody knows the real risks of chemicals where the exposure exceeds the derived no-effect level (DNEL). The risk assessor only knows that the likelihood of adverse effects increases when the DNEL/E ratios decrease or the E/DNEL ratios increase. Thus, such ratios are internationally accepted only as substitutes for risks. 

Figure 12. The likelihood distributions, normalized to equal areas under the curves, for the baryon-to-photon ratios (r/io) derived from BBN ( 20 minutes), from the CMB ( few hundred thousand years), and for the present universe (to 10 Gyr z 1).

Adjusted odds ratios were derived from a multiple logistic regression analysis in which each odds ratio was adjusted for all other factors listed. An odds ratio higher than 1 indicates that patients with the characteristic have a higher likelihood of having an intracranial hemorrhage than those without the characteristic. 

That is, dropping down vertically at constant x from a selected intermediate position on the K line, an arbitrary value for y can be selected. These values of x and y can then be used to determine the corresponding L/V ratio for the flash. The determination is not trial and error as presented. However, if the ratio L/V is preselected, then the determination becomes trial and error. In principle, there is the likelihood that the ratio L/V corresponds to the ratio X/(l - X) as previously derived, and any point on this latter line can be used to determine the flash compositions. Furthermore, these positions can be assigned as the compositions at the feed stage. 

The word probability derives from the Latin word probare (to prove, or to test). Probable is one of several words applied to uncertain events or knowledge, being more or less interchangeable with likely, risky, hazardous, uncertain, doubtful, chance, odds, and bet depending on the context. When conducting safety assessments, the term probability is used to give us an indication of the likelihood of a random event occurring. It is a relative frequency of the ratio of n successes in N trials so ... 

---