Latin square complete block

What is the relationship - Youden square designs Latin square designs balanced incomplete block designs randomized complete block designs ... 

Although this direct method is more adequate for the given example, because the number of the values that are not available are smaller than the sum of rows and columns, the constant method has also been demonstrated for the case of comparison. It should be noted that both methods are generally used in two-way classification such as designs of completely randomized blocks, Latin squares, factorial experiments, etc. Once the values that are not available are estimated, the averages of individual blocks and factor levels are calculated and calculations by analysis of variance done. The degree of freedom is thereby counted only with respect to the number of experimental values. Results of analysis of variance for this example are... 

Sample size and treatment choice are key design questions for general multifactor experiments. Authors have proposed the use of standard factorial experiments in completely randomized designs, block designs, or Latin squares (see, for example, Chapter 6 and Churchill, 2003). However, the unusual distribution of gene expression data makes one question the relevance of standard orthogonal factorial experiments in this context. 

Randomized Complete Block, Latin Square, Split Plot, and Other... 

If the experiment is planned in more detail than a randomized complete block design implies, it may be helpful to consider such designs as Latin squares, split plots, and others. These designs are not difficult to analyze and may, in certain instances, prove profitable. 

A covariance analysis may be performed on appropriate data for any of the standard designs that is, completely randomized, randomized complete block, Latin square, split plot, and so on. The technique is the... 

Sessions were not balanced the first session presented small datasets, while the second presented large datasets. Sessions were split into three blocks, one for each representation. The order of the representations was complete and counterbalanced across subjects. Each representation block was split into three blocks of three datasets (small for the first session, large for the second) counterbalanced across subjects using a Latin square. We alternated the order of representations to reduce memorization effects subjects remembering the answer from the previous representation and dataset. However, we kept the order of datasets constant for each session and counterbalanced across subjects. 

---