Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Jamming limit

Figure la. Monte Carlo simulation of protein adsorption. At the jamming limit for disks, the final coverage is 0.547 of the available area. [Pg.584]

Limited to product for which entry is sized. Difficult to remove jams. Limits visibility. [Pg.651]

Colloidal gradients were prepared by successively exposing a surface to a colloidal suspension with known properties for a specific time interval. If the surface and the particles interact electrostatically, particles will start to adsorb and form an incomplete particle layer, the number adsorbed depending on the time for which the particles were allowed to adsorb. This process is sketched in Figure 2, which (a) shows the situation after short adsorption times and (b) represents the jamming limit of the monolayer (which is reached after a longer time interval, depending on particle concentration). [Pg.513]

C. Khripin, Random sequential adsorption of line segments with a finite jamming limit,/ Colloid Interface Sci., 323, 213-215 (2008). [Pg.653]

Recent work has shown that in the very dense state, there are similiarities in granular and suspension flows. Since at the jamming limit it is no longer possible to distinguish suspensions and granular material, there is an essential similarity between the two for very concentrated flows. In this limit, contacts between particles are a dominant stress transmission mechanism. Contacts have historically received little attention in suspension mechanics, whereas in the study of granular materials they are essential. [Pg.406]

This value of 0=oid, referred to as the jamming limit in one dimension, was obtained originally by Renyi and others [59, 60]. Interestingly, a very similar value of the jamming limit (i.e. 0.7506) was obtained in the diffusion RSA process solved analytically in Ref [61]. [Pg.213]

Assuming cells fit completely on the surface i.e., the packing efficiency is 100% and there is no exposed surface area, the number of cells on the surface is = A/Aceti-However, even a surface apparently well-covered by bacteria will not be completely packed. For example, the surface shown in Fig. 7.2 looks covered by bacteria, but a count of the microspheres normalized to the surface area indicated that only 30% of the surface was covered. In bacterial adhesion experiments, a surface acts as if it is completely covered (referred to as the jamming limit) when as little as 3-5% of the sites are occupied by bacteria (Vadillo-Rodriguez and Logan 2006). Even tightly spaced spherical particles will only cover 54% of the surface due to packing limits. [Pg.117]

CWG van Gelder, EJJ Leusen, JAM Leunissen, JH Noordik. A molecular dynamics approach for the generation of complete protein structures from limited coordinate data. Proteins 18 174-185, 1994. [Pg.304]

The elution of such gels is an example not of size exclusion but rather of hydrodynamic fractionation (HDF). However, it must be remembered that merely being able to physically fit an insoluble material through the column interstices is not the only criterion for whether the GPC/HDF analysis of an insoluble material will be successful. A well-designed HDF packing and eluant combination will often elute up to the estimated radius in Eq. (5), but adsorption can drastically limit this upper analysis radius. For example, work in our laboratory using an 8-mm-bead-diameter Polymer Laboratories aqueous GPC column for HDF found that that column could not elute 204 nM pSty particles, even though Eq. (5) estimates a critical radius of —1.5 jam. [Pg.553]

Method Droplet Size (jam) Metal/Alloy Cooling Rate (°C/s) Through- put (kg/min) Capacity (Metric Tons) Advantage Limitation... [Pg.72]

There are a number of limitations on the use of extremes of temperature in HPLC. Clicq et al. [91] note that instrumental issues become increasingly limiting as one goes to very high temperatures and flow rates. They suggest that most separations will occur below 90°C where there are less instrumental constraints. As detailed below, column bleed can limit the selection of columns. Highspeed separations require a faster detector response than many systems allow and constrain extra column volume. This is especially true for narrow bore columns and sub-2 jam particles. In many cases, the additional speed gained above the temperature limits of commercial HPLC ovens will not be worth the additional expense and complexity required. For macromolecules, the effect of extreme pressure can also impact retention time as noted by Szabelski et al. [92]. [Pg.269]

Newer high velocity thermal spray coating processes produce coatings in compression rather than tension because of the shot peening effect of the supersonic particles on impact. This has permitted coating as thick as 12,500 JAm without delamination as compared to older processes limited to 1,250 Jm. The reduced residence time of particles at temperature minimizes decomposition of carbides present in conventional d-c plasma. This improves wear and hardness (qv) properties. [Pg.41]


See other pages where Jamming limit is mentioned: [Pg.706]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.1913]    [Pg.724]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.239]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.172 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.172 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info