Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

J Filters

More sophisticated experiments may involve binomial coefficients [69,73] for the number of t experiments and application of selective pulses [74,75] in order to minimize signal overlap. The advantage of chemical shift filters over corresponding 2D experiments is that the number of t experiments can be significantly reduced and considerably higher digital resolution can be obtained. [Pg.14]

There are many experiments where one of the basic problems is to separate the responses that are transferred through large couplings from those transferred through small couplings. A typical example is separation of one-bond H- Si [Pg.14]


Perry-O Keeee H., Stender H., Broo-MER A., Oliveira K., Coull J., Hyldig-Nielsen J.J. Filter-based PNA in situ hybridization for rapid detection, identification and enumeration of specific microorganisms. /. Appl. Microbiol. 2001 90 180-189. [Pg.177]

In its standard implementation, the suppression of the undesired one-bond correlations is far from complete using a one-step low-pass J filter HMBC pulse sequence. Effective modifications are needed to achieve this goal when there is a wide range of Vch values. There are several kinds of pulse... [Pg.301]

In 1983, Kogler et al. had proposed that the low-pass J filtering process can be repeated and improved several times with different intervals x, x2, in order to properly eliminate all 1Jch peaks when a wide range of one-bond coupling constants 1Jch is present in the molecule under study (Figure 4).15 After the low-pass J filter, as shown by Equation (8), the... [Pg.302]

For a one-step low-pass J filter, the one-bond responses /lpi are expected to be proportional to... [Pg.303]

Obviously, the one-step low-pass J filter produces the narrowest profile and is therefore the less efficient in removing direct correlations in HMBC spectra, while the five-step tuned low-pass J filter (f lps) offers the most broadband profile. For this filter, the intensity of the residual /ch signals remains below 0.11% for the range 125 < /ch < 225 Hz, which is remarkable. Interestingly, as long as the /ch couplings range of the molecule remains moderate (—60 Hz), the four- and five-step filters... [Pg.303]

Attenuation of the long-range magnetization after N-step low-pass J filters... [Pg.305]

Unavoidably, the efficiency of the different low-pass J filters in removing direct correlations induces attenuation of the signals associated with long-range couplings. For some molecules, the choice of the most suitable low-pass J filter may be first determined by the attenuation of those signals. Neglecting relaxation, pulse imperfections and offset effects, the... [Pg.305]

TABLE 2 Maximal residual transverse proton magnetization and maximal attenuation for nJCn coupling constants <8 Hz < 20 Hz and < 30 Hz for one-, two-, three-, four- and five-step low-pass J filters... [Pg.306]

For non-experienced users, which may prefer to use one single experimental parameter set suitable for all samples, or for being used in automatic mode, we found experimentally that the three-step low-pass J filter offers the best compromise between 1Jch suppression and "/ch attenuation. It provides excellent results for nearly all molecules, and only in very special cases a four- or a five-step low-pass J filter will be required. [Pg.307]

The efficiency of the various low-pass J filters may be appreciated by considering the HMBC spectra of 1,3-butadiynyl (ferf-butyl) diphenylsi-lane (Figure 6), which provides a stringent test because of the extensive range of 1Jch coupling constants present. [Pg.307]

Partial plots extracted from HMBC spectra recorded with the five different low-pass J filters are shown in Figure 7. Clearly, ambiguities may arise, particularly if accidental degeneracy in chemical shifts causes true long-range correlations and residual 1Jch correlations to overlap. [Pg.307]

The results shown in Figure 8 are in good agreement with the theoretical results shown in Table 2. The value of the 2/c2hi coupling is very large, 49 Hz, and the attenuation during the respective low-pass J filters is subsequent (left). It must be pointed out that relaxation has not been... [Pg.307]

Figure 8 Comparison of nJch intensity illustrated with ID rows taken from HMBC experiments recorded using a one-step low-pass J filter (denoted LP), a two-step LPJF (denoted LP2), a three-step LPJF (denoted LP3), a four-step LPJF (denoted LP4), and a five-step LPJF (denoted LP5) showing the nJch response of C-2 (left) and the nJCn response of C-3 (right) of the 1,3-butadiynyl (tert-butyl) diphenylsilane molecule dissolved in CDClj. The measured signal-to-noise (obtained using the sino macro) are indicated on the top of each peak. Figure 8 Comparison of nJch intensity illustrated with ID rows taken from HMBC experiments recorded using a one-step low-pass J filter (denoted LP), a two-step LPJF (denoted LP2), a three-step LPJF (denoted LP3), a four-step LPJF (denoted LP4), and a five-step LPJF (denoted LP5) showing the nJch response of C-2 (left) and the nJCn response of C-3 (right) of the 1,3-butadiynyl (tert-butyl) diphenylsilane molecule dissolved in CDClj. The measured signal-to-noise (obtained using the sino macro) are indicated on the top of each peak.
Figure 9 Timing diagram of the BIRD-HMBC pulse sequence for the detection of nJch correlations, including an additional two-step low-pass J filter. Thin and thick bars represent 90° and 180° pulses, respectively. 13C180° pulses are replaced by 90°y — 180°x — 90°y composite pulses. <5 is set to 0.5/(Vch) and A is set to 0.5/("JCH). Phases are cycled as follows fa = y, y, —y, —y 4>j = x, —x fa — 8(x), 8(—x) fa = 4(x), 4(— x) ( rec = 2 (x, — x), 4(—x, x), 2(x, —x). Phases not shown are along the x-axis. Gradient pulses are represented by filled half-ellipses denoted by Gi-G3. They should be applied in the ratio 50 30 40.1. Figure 9 Timing diagram of the BIRD-HMBC pulse sequence for the detection of nJch correlations, including an additional two-step low-pass J filter. Thin and thick bars represent 90° and 180° pulses, respectively. 13C180° pulses are replaced by 90°y — 180°x — 90°y composite pulses. <5 is set to 0.5/(Vch) and A is set to 0.5/("JCH). Phases are cycled as follows fa = y, y, —y, —y 4>j = x, —x fa — 8(x), 8(—x) fa = 4(x), 4(— x) ( rec = 2 (x, — x), 4(—x, x), 2(x, —x). Phases not shown are along the x-axis. Gradient pulses are represented by filled half-ellipses denoted by Gi-G3. They should be applied in the ratio 50 30 40.1.
The low-pass J filter efficiency obtained may be improved by implementing a second low-pass J filter element. Taking advantage of the double-difference principle, this two-step filter is expected to yield high... [Pg.311]

Figure 13 Timing diagram for the clean HMBC experiment with an initial second-order and terminal adiabatic low-pass 7-filter.42,43 The recommended delays for the filters are the same than for a third-order low-pass J filter. <5 and 8 are gradient delays, where 8 — <5 + accounts for the delay of the first point in the 13C dimension. The integral over each gradient pulse G, is H/2yc times the integral over gradient G2 in order to achieve coherence selection. The recommended phase cycle is c/)n = x, x, x, x 3 — 4(x), 4(y), 4( x), 4(—y) with the receiver phase c/)REC = x, x. Figure 13 Timing diagram for the clean HMBC experiment with an initial second-order and terminal adiabatic low-pass 7-filter.42,43 The recommended delays for the filters are the same than for a third-order low-pass J filter. <5 and 8 are gradient delays, where 8 — <5 + accounts for the delay of the first point in the 13C dimension. The integral over each gradient pulse G, is H/2yc times the integral over gradient G2 in order to achieve coherence selection. The recommended phase cycle is c/)n = x, x, x, x <p2 = x, x, 4 (—x), x, x and </>3 — 4(x), 4(y), 4( x), 4(—y) with the receiver phase c/)REC = x, x.
For those purposes, the authors used constant-time version of the sensitivity-enhanced HMBC sequence,79 combined with a two-step low-pass J filter. Constant-time experiments have no coupling structures in the carbon dimension making it easy to identify the centre of signals in... [Pg.337]


See other pages where J Filters is mentioned: [Pg.154]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.323]   


SEARCH



Low-pass J filters

© 2024 chempedia.info