IV processing

Geist, A., Modolo, G., Weigl, M. 2003. SANEX-IV process development studies Di(chlorophenyl)dithiophosphinic acid as selective extractant for actinides(III). Proc Int Workshop on P T and ADS Development. SCK-CEN, Mol, Belgium, October 6-8. 

Fresh, filtered feedstock is heated together with hydrogen and recycle gas and charged to the downflow reactor from which the liquid product goes to fractionation after flashing to produce the various product streams. Each process type is basically similar to its predecessor (Figure 9-11) but will differ in the number of reactors. For example, modifications necessary to convert the Type II to the Type III process consist of the addition of a reactor and related equipment, while the Type III process can be modified to a Type IV process by the addition of a... 

The open loop transfer function of an IPDT IV process is the following ... 

As illustrated in Section IV.B.2.e, Rh(acac)3 exhibits an irreversible one-electron oxidation and an irreversible two-electron reduction in MeCN solution. The introduction of an anthrylmethyl group in the y-position of one of the acac ligands as in 130 modifies the redox activity of the entire complex . The irreversible two-electron reduction of Rh(acac)3 (E = —2.21s V, vs. SCE, thf) moves anodically by about 0.3 V (Ep = — 1.88 V) and is followed by a reversible, anthryl-centred reduction ( ° = —2.14 V). In addition, no rhodium-centred oxidation is detected. Since the anodic shift of the Rh(llt) Rh(I) step indicates that the anthrylmethyl group pushes electron density towards the rhodium(IIl) core, it does not seem possible that the lack of the Rh(III) Rh(IV) process might be due to its anodic shift beyond the solvent discharge. 

Minimize Significantly reduce the quantity of hazardous material or energy in the system, or eliminate the hazard entirely if possible. It is necessary to use small quantities of hazardous substances or energy in (i) storage, (ii) intermediate storage, (iii) piping and (iv) process equipment, as discussed in the previous sections. The benefits are to reduce the consequence of incident (explosion, fire, toxic material release), and improve the effectiveness and feasibility of other protective systems (e.g. secondary containment, reactor dump or quench systems). Process intensification (see below) is also a way to reach this objective. 

Table IV. Processing Data Regarding Hyperfiltration of ISSPH...

Table IV. Process conditions for enzyme release simulation ...

---