Ionization energy electronegativity relationship

From what you know of the relationship between ionization energies, electron affinities, and electronegativities, would you expect the addition of some d character to a hybrid to raise or lower the electronegativity for example, will sulfur be more electronegative when hybridized spi or jp [Pg.649]

Does electronegativity have any relationship to ionization energy Explain. 

In contrast to the claim (10) that the ECW model "disguises the relationship between reactivity and periodic elemental properties", elementary application of frontier molecular orbital theory (H) can be used to understand the trends. Using qualitative trends in ionization energies, inductive effects, electronegativities and partial charge/size ratios, one can estimate trends in the HOMO-LUMO separation of the donor and acceptor. Increasing the separation decreases the covalent and increases the electrostatic nature of the interaction. Decreasing the separation has the opposite effect. Trends in the reported acid and base parameters as well as in the Ey E0 and C C0 products can be understood in this way. 

The equation is valid for a given valence state. For instance, for trigonal boron compounds, a value of electronegativity can be defined for sp hybrid orbitals. Moreover, if the values of the ionization energy and electron affinity are expressed in MJ.moF , then the Mulliken electronegativity scale can be related to the Pauling scale by the relationship ... 

The following properties of astatine have been measured or estimated (a) covalent radius (b) ionic radius (At ) (c) first ionization energy (d) electron affinity (c) electronegativity (f) standard reduction potential. Based on periodic relationships and data in Table 22.4, what values would you expect for these properties ... 

Not included in the previous survey are the efforts that have been made to relate polarizabilities to other properties. This would have been close to Pauling s heart since he was always, as a chemist, after trends and relationships. To make amends, the reader is referred to recent publications on connections to atomic ionization potentials[101], atomic softness[102], bond dissociation energies[103], and electronegativities[104]. 

In 1934, Mulliken proposed a different electronegativity scale based upon the average of the ionization potential in volts (IP X X + e ) and the electron affinity (EA X + e" X ) of the gas-phase atoms. This approach is more in character with Mulliken s MO approach since IP reflects the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) while the EA has a relationship to the energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). Not surprisingly, there has been continued debate ever since over the superiority of these two and numerous later electronegativity scales. 

---