Intramolecular reactions cationic manifold

Enantioselective intramolecular cascade Mizoroki-Heck reactions have been shown to proceed with moderate to good selectivity via the cationic manifold. There are surprisingly few enantioselective examples, given the wide array of transformations known for cr-alkylpalladium intermediates in racemic or diastereoselective reactions. All of the nongroup-selective, enantioselective, cascade, intramolecular Mizoroki-Heck reactions reported to date involve formation of one quaternary centre. A substantial advance would be to expand the range of transformations available for the a-alkylpalladium species and... 

The final cyclization manifold has been realized with a different ruthenium catalyst (Scheme 22). The cationic [Cp Ru(MeCN)3]PF6 induces exclusive endo-dig cyclization of both homopropargylic and bis-homopropargylic alcohols.29 73 The clean reaction to form a seven-membered ring is noteworthy for several reasons intramolecular exo-dig cyclization with bis-homopropargylic alcohols is not well established, the platinum-catalyzed case has been reported to be problematic,80 and the selectivity for seven-membered ring formation over the exo-dig cyclization to form a six-membered ring is likely not thermodynamic. The endo-dig cyclization manifold was thus significant evidence that a re-examination of alkyne hydrosilylation mechanisms is necessary (see Section 10.17.2). 

As in the uncatalyzed reactions with enamines (vide supra), there is potentially more than one point where stereochemical differentiation can occur (Scheme 59). Selectivity can occur if the initial addition of the enol ether to the Lewis acid complex of the a,/J-unsaturated acceptor (step A) is the product-determining step. Reversion of the initial adduct 59.1 to the neutral starting acceptor and the silyl enol ether is possible, at least in some cases. If the Michael-retro-Michael manifold is rapid, then selectivity in the product generation would be determined by the relative rates of the decomposition of the diastereomers of the dipolar intermediate (59.1). For example, preferential loss of the silyl cation (or rm-butyl cation for tert-butyl esters step B) from one of the isomers could lead to selectivity in product construction. Alternatively, intramolecular transfer of the silyl cation from the donor to the acceptor (step D) could be preferred for one of the diastereomeric intermediates. If the Michael-retro-Michael addition pathway is rapid and an alternative mechanism (silyl transfer) is product-determining, then the stereochemistry of the adducts formed should show little dependence on the configuration of the starting materials employed, as is observed. 

---