Interface mesoscopic

Continuum models go one step frirtlier and drop the notion of particles altogether. Two classes of models shall be discussed field theoretical models that describe the equilibrium properties in temis of spatially varying fields of mesoscopic quantities (e.g., density or composition of a mixture) and effective interface models that describe the state of the system only in temis of the position of mterfaces. Sometimes these models can be derived from a mesoscopic model (e.g., the Edwards Hamiltonian for polymeric systems) but often the Hamiltonians are based on general symmetry considerations (e.g., Landau-Ginzburg models). These models are well suited to examine the generic universal features of mesoscopic behaviour. 

Poon W C K and Haw M D 1997 Mesoscopic structure formation in colloidal aggregation and gelation Adv. Colloid Interface Sc/. 73 71-126... 

In this situation computer simulation is useful, since the conditions of the simulation can be chosen such that full equihbrium is established, and one can test the theoretical concepts more stringently than by experiment. Also, it is possible to deal with ideal and perfectly flat surfaces, very suitable for testing the general mechanisms alluded to above, and to disregard in a first step all the complications that real substrate surfaces have (corrugation on the atomistic scale, roughness on the mesoscopic scale, surface steps, adsorbed impurities, etc.). Of course, it may be desirable to add such complications at a later stage, but this will not be considered here. In fact, computer simulations, i.e., molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations, have been extensively used to study both static and dynamic properties [11] in particular, structural properties at interfaces have been considered in detail [12]. 

The surface dividing the components of the mixture formed by a layer of surfactant characterizes the structure of the mixture on a mesoscopic length scale. This interface is described by its global properties such as the surface area, the Euler characteristic or genus, distribution of normal vectors, or in more detail by its local properties such as the mean and Gaussian curvatures. 

Classical surface and colloid chemistry generally treats systems experimentally in a statistical fashion, with phenomenological theories that are applicable only to building simplified microstructural models. In recent years scientists have learned not only to observe individual atoms or molecules but also to manipulate them with subangstrom precision. The characterization of surfaces and interfaces on nanoscopic and mesoscopic length scales is important both for a basic understanding of colloidal phenomena and for the creation and mastery of a multitude of industrial applications. 

In what follows we will discuss systems with internal surfaces, ordered surfaces, topological transformations, and dynamical scaling. In Section II we shall show specific examples of mesoscopic systems with special attention devoted to the surfaces in the system—that is, periodic surfaces in surfactant systems, periodic surfaces in diblock copolymers, bicontinuous disordered interfaces in spinodally decomposing blends, ordered charge density wave patterns in electron liquids, and dissipative structures in reaction-diffusion systems. In Section III we will present the detailed theory of morphological measures the Euler characteristic, the Gaussian and mean curvatures, and so on. In fact, Sections II and III can be read independently because Section II shows specific models while Section III is devoted to the numerical and analytical computations of the surface characteristics. In a sense, Section III is robust that is, the methods presented in Section III apply to a variety of systems, not only the systems shown as examples in Section II. Brief conclusions are presented in Section IV. 

In this section, we describe the role of fhe specific membrane environment on proton transport. As we have already seen in previous sections, it is insufficient to consider the membrane as an inert container for water pathways. The membrane conductivity depends on the distribution of water and the coupled dynamics of wafer molecules and protons af multiple scales. In order to rationalize structural effects on proton conductivity, one needs to take into account explicit polymer-water interactions at molecular scale and phenomena at polymer-water interfaces and in wafer-filled pores at mesoscopic scale, as well as the statistical geometry and percolation effects of the phase-segregated random domains of polymer and wafer at the macroscopic scale. 

Figure 2.4 Effect of size of interface on molecular recognition efficiency as exemplified by guanidinium-phosphate interaction (a) molecularly dispersed system (b) mesoscopic interface (surfaces of micelles and bilayers) (c) macroscopic interface (air-water interface).31 (Reprinted with permission from...

Inorganic nanoparticles themselves can be assembled into mesoscopic structures. Dinsmore et al. proposed an approach for the fabrication of solid capsules from colloidal particles with precise control of size, permeability, mechanical strength, and compatibility (Fig. 2.9).44 This unusual mesoscopic structure is called colloidosome and is prepared through emulsion droplets at a water-oil interface. Following the locking together of the particles to form elastic shells, the emulsion droplets were transferred to a fresh continuous-phase fluid identical to that contained inside the droplets. The resultant structures are hollow, elastic shells whose permeability and elasticity can be precisely controlled. 

For practical and fundamental reasons, there was a need to learn about the interactions of bodies much larger than the atoms and small molecules in gases. What interested people were systems we now call mesoscopic, with particles whose finite size Wilhelm Ostwald famously termed "the neglected dimension" 100-nm to 1 ()()-//m colloids suspended in solutions, submicrometer aerosols sprayed into air, surfaces and interfaces between condensed phases, films of nanometer to millimeter thickness. What to do ... 

Materials modeling, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16 Mesoscopic models, 13 Metal-water interfaces, 12 Molecular connectivity, 2 Molecular design, 1, 5 Molecular diversity, 16... 

Reactions that occur between components in the bulk solution and vesicle-bound components, i.e., reactions occurring across the membrane interface, can be treated mathematically as if they were bimolecular reactions in homogeneous solution. However, kinetic analyses of reactions on the surface of mesoscopic structures are complicated by the finiteness of the reaction space, which may obviate the use of ordinary equations of chemical kinetics that treat the reaction environment as an infinite surface populated with constant average densities of reactant molecules. As was noted above, the kinetics of electron-transfer reactions on the surface of spherical micelles and vesicles is expressed by a sum of exponentials that can be approximated by a single exponential function only at relatively long times [79a, 81], At short times, the kinetics of the oxidative quenching of excited molecules on these surfaces are approximated by the equation [102]... 

Thus, the rate and selectivity of catalyzed reactions over molecular sieve catalysts are influenced by factors that are affiliated with the specific interface chemistry (chemical induced selectivity) and the constraints induced by the steric limitations (shape selectivity). This advantage, however, also induces drawbacks that can only be partly overcome by adjustment of the mesoscopic properties of the molecular sieve. 

---