Instability spinning

Note that multiconfigurational coordination bonding raises a number of difficult technical and computational issues, as discussed in Sidebar 8.2. In this section, we seek to bypass technical issues as far as possible, focusing instead on qualitative aspects of coordination bonding that seem to be adequately described by the DFT-based methods employed throughout this book. However, the student is forewarned that explorations beyond the relatively simple examples described below will typically require dealing with RHF/UHF instability, spin contamination, and other issues alluded to in Sidebar 8.2.]... 

As a final note, be aware that Hartree-Fock calculations performed with small basis sets are many times more prone to finding unstable SCF solutions than are larger calculations. Sometimes this is a result of spin contamination in other cases, the neglect of electron correlation is at the root. The same molecular system may or may not lead to an instability when it is modeled with a larger basis set or a more accurate method such as Density Functional Theory. Nevertheless, wavefunctions should still be checked for stability with the SCF=Stable option. ... 

The optimum value of c is determined by the variational principle. If c = 1, the UHF wave function is identical to RHF. This will normally be the case near the equilibrium distance. As the bond is stretched, the UHF wave function allows each of the electrons to localize on a nucleus c goes towards 0. The point where the RHF and UHF descriptions start to differ is often referred to as the RHF/UHF instability point. This is an example of symmetry breaking, as discussed in Section 3.8.3. The UHF wave function correctly dissociates into two hydrogen atoms, however, the symmetry breaking of the MOs has two other, closely connected, consequences introduction of electron correlation and spin contamination. To illustrate these concepts, we need to look at the 4 o UHF determinant, and the six RHF determinants in eqs. (4.15) and (4.16) in more detail. We will again ignore all normalization constants. 

The instability and nonplanar character of the detonation front was first exhibited by Manson [1] and Fay [2] in certain particular cases of detonation propagation, such as fhe "spinning detonations." The multidimensional nature of the detonation front has been established by Voitsekhovskii [3], Denisov and Troshin [4],... 

The conclusions from this rather elementary survey of the symmetry constraint problem all point in the same general direction. The imposition of symmetry constraints (other than the Pauli principle) on a variationally-based model is either unnecessary or harmful. Far from being necessary to ensure the physical reality of the wave function, these constraints often lead to absurd results or numerical instabilities in the implementation. The spin eigenfunction constraint is only realistic when the electrons are in close proximity and in such cases comes out of the UHF calculation automatically. The imposition of molecular spatial symmetry on the AO basis is not necessary if that basis has been chosen carefully — i.e. is near optimum. Further, any breakdowns in the spatial symmetry of the AO basis are a useful indication that the basis has been chosen badly or is redundant. 

Expressions for the medium modifications of the cluster distribution functions can be derived in a quantum statistical approach to the few-body states, starting from a Hamiltonian describing the nucleon-nucleon interaction by the potential V"(12, l/2/) (1 denoting momentum, spin and isospin). We first discuss the two-particle correlations which have been considered extensively in the literature [5,7], Results for different quantities such as the spectral function, the deuteron binding energy and wave function as well as the two-nucleon scattering phase shifts in the isospin singlet and triplet channel have been evaluated for different temperatures and densities. The composition as well as the phase instability was calculated. 

One can further increase the amount of transferred polarization if one carries out the cross polarization in an adiabatic fashion. In this experiment, the amplitude of one of the spin-lock fields is usually varied in a tangential shape [33-35]. In addition to the compensation of instabilities in the amplitude and rf field inhomogeneities, one can also obtain a gain in signal by a up to a factor of two. The concept of adiabatic polarization transfer will be discussed in more detail in Sect. 11.3.1. 

The occurrence of necking in the spin line indicates the instability of deformation and the system therefore restabilizes. Similar behavior to that shown with temperature can be observed in the presence of plasticizers. The fracture is promoted by increased stress in the case of plastic deformation. Cracks or notches at the surfaces of fibers and films are also the reason for disturbed deformation due to the more rapidly increased stress at the tips of these defect sites. 

---