Initiation step, metallacyclic intermediate

In any chain reaction, apart from initiation steps, the termination steps are also important. In metathesis there are many possibilities for termination reactions. Besides the reverse of the initiation step, the reaction between two carbene species is also a possibility (eq. (17)). The observation that, when using the Me4SnAVCl6 system, as well as methane traces of ethylene are also observed [26] is in agreement with this reaction. Further reactions which lead to loss of catalytic activity are (1) the destruction of the metallacyclobutane intermediate resulting in the formation of cyclopropanes or alkenes, and (2) the reaction of the metallacycle or metal carbene with impurities in the system or with the functional group in the case of a functionally substituted alkene (e. g., Wittig-type reactions of the metal carbene with carbonyl groups). 

As previously discussed, the unfavorable equilibria associated with ligand dissociation during the initiation step of an olefin metathesis reaction have traditionally hindered the direct observation of metathesis-active ruthenacyclobutane intermediates [24]. Thus far, we have seen that the use of phosphonium alkylidene complexes, such as 22, can enable facile access to metallacycle formation by providing an alternative route for catalyst initiation. However, despite the utility of these trialkylphosphonium alkylidene catalysts, their preparation requires a multi-step synthetic route that requires the use of costly reagents [28]. In addition, the vinyl trialkylphosphonium salt generated following the reaction of 22 presents a less relevant model in comparison to the styrene (34) formed from the commercially available benzylidene catalysts. 

---