Human errors are inevitable in chemistry, too

In this chapter we have discussed some examples of incorrect structural proposals. Errors originated from (1) preoccupied and unusual assumptions about the possible structures, (2) inappropriate consideration of limitation of the available purification and analytical techniques, or (3) unreliable bioassay methods. In many cases, there was a human desire to reach a good result as soon as possible. In other words, there was pressure related to the well-known phrase, publish or perish.  

How can we avoid errors such as those discussed in this chapter All researchers must maintain a calm and peaceful state of mind in order to judge their results correctly. A nonrigorous and too optimistic interpretation of the analytical or biological data is always a dangerous stumbling block. All research leaders must carefully examine the results obtained by their coworkers. Too competitive an atmosphere among coworkers may lead to misconduct. 

Because science is a human achievement, errors will continue to occur. It is almost impossible to avoid errors, even if we work hard every day. The most important action for us to take is to admit our own errors as soon as we discover the correct answers. 

Takagi, M. Takikawa, H. Mori, K. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2001, 65, 2065-2069. 

---