How to calculate the dipole moment

The dipole moment in the normalized state n) is calculated (according to the postulates of quantum mechanics. Chapter 1) as the mean value = (n / n) of the dipole moment operator  

For a neutral molecule only, the dipole moment operator and the dipole moment itself do not depend on the choice of the origin of the coordinate system. When two coordinate systems differ by translation R, then, in general, we may obtain two different results (rj and Qi stand for the position vector and charge of particle i)  

This represents a special case of the theorem, saying that the lowest nonvanishing multipole moment does not depend on the choice of the coordinate astern all others may depend on that choice. 

---

The Non-Homogeneous Electric Field Multipole Polarizabilities and HyperpolarizabiUties How to Calculate the Dipole Moment (4(D)... 

You are not asked to calculate the dipole moment on the AP test, but you do need to understand what it represents and how to work with it. What follows is a description of the types of information that usually appear on the AP test for dipole moments. 

In order to show the reader how we calculate the dipole moment in practfce, let us use the Hartree-Fock approximation. Using the normalized Slater determinant o) we have as the Hartree-Fock approximation to the dipole moment ... 

We haven t covered, and won t cover, how to calculate the size of a dipole moment, but we can decide whether a compound has a dipole moment or not. Only compound B has dipole moment. The individual bond dipoles in A, C, and D cancel therefore, none of these three has a dipole moment. 

Now, we are encountering a serious problem (which we always encounter in the multipole expansion), what is / We are forced to choose the two local coordinate systems in A and B. We arbitrarily decide here to locate these origins in the middle of each dipolar system, and therefore R = 10. It looks like a reasonable choice, and as will be shown later on, it really is. We are all set to calculate the dipole-dipole interaction —2-10 (—1)(—1) = —0.0020000. Close Theexactcal-culated interaction energy is —0.0020202. Where is the rest Is there any error in our dipole-dipole interaction formula We simply forgot that our dipolar systems represent not only the dipole moments, but also have non-zero octupole moments (the quadrupoles are equal zero) and non-zero higher odd-order multipoles, and we did not take them into account. If somebody calculated all the interactions of such multipoles, we would recover the correct interaction energy with any desired accuracy. How come, however, that such a simple dipolar system also has a non-zero octupole moment The answer is simple it is because the dipole is not... 

I quantities x and y are different, then the correlation function js sometimes referred to ross-correlation function. When x and y are the same then the function is usually called an orrelation function. An autocorrelation function indicates the extent to which the system IS a memory of its previous values (or, conversely, how long it takes the system to its memory). A simple example is the velocity autocorrelation coefficient whose indicates how closely the velocity at a time t is correlated with the velocity at time me correlation functions can be averaged over all the particles in the system (as can elocity autocorrelation function) whereas other functions are a property of the entire m (e.g. the dipole moment of the sample). The value of the velocity autocorrelation icient can be calculated by averaging over the N atoms in the simulation ... 

Use Learning By Modeling to compare the calculated dipole moments of ethylene propene vinyl chloride and trans 1 chloropropene Unlike measured dipole moments the calculated ones do show the direction of the dipole moment How do the directions of the calculated dipole moments compare with those deduced by experimenf ... 

Repeat your analysis for tautomeric equilibria between 4-hydroxypyridine and 4-pyridone, 2-hydroxypyrimidine and 2-pyrimidone and 4-hydroxypyrimidine and 4-pyrimidone. For each, identify the favored (lower-energy) tautomer, and then use equation (1) to calculate the ratio of tautomers present at equilibrium. Point out any major differences among the four systems and rationalize what you observe. (Hint Compare dipole moments and electrostatic potential maps of the two pyridones and the two pyrimidones. How are these related to molecular stability )... 

This is not an SCRF model, as the dipole moment and stabilization are not calculated in a self-consistent way. When the back-polarization of the medium is taken into account, the dipole moment changes, depending on how polarizable the molecule is. Taking only the first-order effect into account, the stabilization becomes (a is the molecular polarizability, the first-order change in the dipole moment with respect to an electric field, Section 10.1.1). 

Until very recently there was no information about how an MM pair potential should look, based upon calculations from the deeper BO level. In the simplest BO level model for an ionic solution the solvent molecules are represented as hard spheres with centered point dipoles and the ions as hard spheres with centered charges. Now there are two sets of calculations, (16,17) by very different approximation methods, for this model where all of the spheres are 3A in diameter, where the dipole moments are near 1 Debye, and where the ions are singly charged. The temperature is 25° and the solvent concentration is about 50M, corresponding to a liquid state. The dielectric constant of the model solvent is believed to be near 9 6. 

Kaiser [90] showed how the sign ambiguity above can be resolved, and the absolute signs of the M matrix elements determined the interested reader is referred to his paper. By combining the M values with the theoretical vibrational wave functions, he was able to use equation (8.339) to derive values of the dipole moment function at a range of values of R R,.. He then fitted the dipole moment function to a sixth-order polynomial in R-Re, from which he was able to calculate the distance derivatives given in table 8.21. 

One might fairly ask if the dipole moments should not be scaled by the same y that scaled the dipoles in calculations of the dielectric susceptibility this was in fact done in earlier treatments (see, for example, Harrison, 1974). However, it is not clear how close are the corrections in the two problems such corrections do not significantly modify the agreement with experiment hence, it is practical to choose the simpler description without y. It is neither an error to include the corrections nor an error to omit them. 

Dipole Moment Convergence As examples of molecular properties we will look at how the dipole moment and harmonic vibrational frequencies converge as a function of level of theory. functions. This illustrates that care must be taken when calculating properties other than the total energy, as standard basis sets may not be able to describe important aspects of the wave function. The HF dipole moment is too large, which is quite general, as the HF wave function... 

---