Heterogeneous catalysis factor

Diffusion in porous solids is usually the most important factor con-troUing mass transfer in adsorption, ion exchange, drying, heterogeneous catalysis, leaching, and many other applications. Some of the... 

An interesting method, which also makes use of the concentration data of reaction components measured in the course of a complex reaction and which yields the values of relative rate constants, was worked out by Wei and Prater (28). It is an elegant procedure for solving the kinetics of systems with an arbitrary number of reversible first-order reactions the cases with some irreversible steps can be solved as well (28-30). Despite its sophisticated mathematical procedure, it does not require excessive experimental measurements. The use of this method in heterogeneous catalysis is restricted to the cases which can be transformed to a system of first-order reactions, e.g. when from the rate equations it is possible to factor out a function which is common to all the equations, so that first-order kinetics results. 

Theoretically, the problem has been attacked by various approaches and on different levels. Simple derivations are connected with the theory of extrathermodynamic relationships and consider a single and simple mechanism of interaction to be a sufficient condition (2, 120). Alternative simple derivations depend on a plurality of mechanisms (4, 121, 122) or a complex mechanism of so called cooperative processes (113), or a particular form of temperature dependence (123). Fundamental studies in the framework of statistical mechanics have been done by Riietschi (96), Ritchie and Sager (124), and Thorn (125). Theories of more limited range of application have been advanced for heterogeneous catalysis (4, 5, 46-48, 122) and for solution enthalpies and entropies (126). However, most theories are concerned with reactions in the condensed phase (6, 127) and assume the controlling factors to be solvent effects (13, 21, 56, 109, 116, 128-130), hydrogen bonding (131), steric (13, 116, 132) and electrostatic (37, 133) effects, and the tunnel effect (4,... 

Sachtler WMH. 1997. Factors influencing catalytic action—Ensemble and ligand effects in metal catalysis. In Ertl G, Kndzinger H, Weitkamp J, eds. Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis. Volume 3. Weinheim VCH-Wiley. 

Inspection of Fig. 15.3 reveals that while for jo 0.1 nAcm , the effectiveness factor is expected to be close to 1, for a faster reaction with Jo 1 p,A cm , it will drop to about 0.2. This is the case of internal diffusion limitation, well known in heterogeneous catalysis, when the reagent concentration at the outer surface of the catalyst grains is equal to its volume concentration, but drops sharply inside the pores of the catalyst. In this context, it should be pointed out that when the pore size is decreased below about 50 nm, the predominant mechanism of mass transport is Knudsen diffusion [Malek and Coppens, 2003], with the diffusion coefficient being less than the Pick diffusion coefficient and dependent on the porosity and pore stmcture. Moreover, the discrete distribution of the catalytic particles in the CL may also affect the measured current owing to overlap of diffusion zones around closely positioned particles [Antoine et ah, 1998]. 

The development of microwave heterogeneous catalysis is, however, impeded because most synthetic chemists are not well acquainted with factors affecting both heterogeneous catalysis and microwaves. Although attempts have been made to accelerate reaction rate or to improve yield and selectivity, they have been based on the rule let s try microwaves and see what happens . 

CI2 evolution reaction, 38 56 electrochemical desorption, 38 53-54 electrode kinetics, 38 55-56 factors that determine, 38 55 ketone reduction, 38 56-57 Langmuir adsorption isotherm, 38 52 recombination desorption, 38 53 surface reaction-order factor, 38 52 Temkin and Frumkin isotherm, 38 53 real-area factor, 38 57-58 regular heterogeneous catalysis, 38 10-16 anodic oxidation of ammonia, 38 13 binding energy quantification, 38 15-16 Haber-Bosch atrunonia synthesis, 38 12-13... 

Interest in studying formic acid adsorption on metals by XPS and UPS was stimulated largely by its use as a probe molecule for investigating the role of the electronic factor in heterogeneous catalysis as in the work of Schwab (70), Dowden and Reynolds (71), Eley and Leutic (72), and Fahren-fort et al. (73). The advantages of XPS and UPS are fourfold. 

Despite various attempts, no single universal correlation between bulk properties and catalytic activity of solids has been found. It is now recognized that the geometric factor and the electronic factor cannot be separated from one another and that catalytic activity should be considered along with catalyst selectivity to arrive at an understanding of heterogeneous catalysis (Sachtler, 1981). 

---