Heat capacity at constant volume and composition

This shows that the entropy at constant volume and composition rises with temperature, as is intuitively evident also, it shows that the heat capacity at constant volume and composition cannot be negative. 

The partial differentials in the above relation may be recast as follows " as wiU be established in Section 1.12 by independent arguments, one may set dS/dT)y = Cy/T, and (dS/dV)j = dP/dT)y , where Cy is the heat capacity at constant volume and composition, and where the appropriate Maxwell relation has been introduced as the second relation. Next, set up the identity dP/dT)y = — dV/dT)p ,/ dV/dP)j. also, replace the numerator and denominator by the definitions —aV and — V, where a and are the isobaric coefficient of expansion and the isothermal compressibility, respectively. Last, set dS/dni)j y = 5, as defining the differential entropy at constant temperature, volume, and composition of species i. In this revised notation, Eq. (1.10.3c) assumes the form... 

It should be mentioned that the important equations (9.9) and (9.11), defining heat capacities at constant volume and constant pressure, respectively, are applicable to any homogeneous system of constant composition. The (simple) system may be gaseous, liquid or solid, and it may consist of a single substance or of a solution whose composition does not vary. As already seen, it is for such systems that the energy is dependent upon only two thermodynamic variables of state, e.g., pressure and temperature or volume and temperature. 

If heat transfer takes place at constant volume, the magnitude is defined as heat capacity at constant volume (Cy) and is equivalent, as we have seen, to the partial derivative of the internal energy of the substance at constant volume and composition ... 

All experimental techniques lead to heat capacities at constant pressure, Cp. In terms of microscopic quantities, however, heat capacity at constant volume, C, is the more accessible quantity. The relationship between Cp and is listed as Eq. (4) in Fig. 2.31 in continuation of Fig. 2.22. It involves several correlations, easily (but tediously) derivable from the first and second law expressions as will be shown next. To simplify the derivation, one starts assuming constant composition for the to be derived equation (no latent heats, dn = 0). From the first law, as given by Eq. (3) of Fig. 2.10, one differentiates dQ at constant pressure. Since (5Q/3T)p = Cp and (8U/8T)v = C, this differentiation gives Eq. (12) of Fig. 2.10 ... 

Since temperature, pressure, and composition are the appropriate independent variables for the Gibbs free energy we must now write out the entropy and volume in the form 5 = S(T, P, n, ) and V = V(T, P, , ), take their differential forms, and substitute these in Eq. (1.20.19a). Following the method used in setting up Eq. (1.13.4c), we next introduce the heat capacity at constant pressure, the appropriate Maxwell relation, as well as a and We also introduce the partial molal entropy S, and volume V,- to obtain... 

Basic to the thermodynamic description is the heat capacity which is defined as the partial differential Cp = (dH/dT)n,p, where H is the enthalpy and T the temperature. The partial differential is taken at constant pressure and composition, as indicated by the subscripts p and n, respectively A close link between microscopic and macroscopic description is possible for this fundamental property. The integral thermodynamic functions include enthalpy H entropy S, and free enthalpy G (Gibbs function). In addition, information on pressure p, volume V, and temperature T is of importance (PVT properties). The transition parameters of pure, one-component systems are seen as first-order and glass transitions. Mesophase transitions, in general, were reviewed (12) and the effect of specific interest to polymers, the conformational disorder, was described in more detail (13). The broad field of multicomponent systems is particularly troubled by nonequilibrium behavior. Polymerization thermodynamics relies on the properties of the monomers and does not have as many problems with nonequilibrium. 

U, H, and S as Functions of T and P or T and V At constant composition, molar thermodynamic properties can be considered functions of T and P (postulate 5). Alternatively, because V is related to T and P through an equation of state, V can serve rather than P as the second independent variable. The useful equations for the total differentials of U, H, and S that result are given in Table 4-1 by Eqs. (4-22) through (4-25). The obvious next step is substitution for the partial differential coefficients in favor of measurable quantities. This purpose is served by definition of two heat capacities, one at constant pressure and the other at constant volume ... 

The solid flow only covers zone D and some mesh elements there are blocked to the solid flow to fit the thickness of iron ore fines layer which are illustrated in Figure 1. Conservation equations of the steady, incompressible solid flow could be defined using the general equation is Eq. (6). In Eq. (6), physical solid velocity is applied. Species of the solid phase include metal iron (Fe), iron oxide (Fc203) and gangue. Terms to represent, T and 5 for the solid flow are listed in Table n. Specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity and viscosity of the solid phase are constant. They are 680 J/(kg K), 0.8 W m/K and 1.0 Pa s respectively. Boundary conditions for solid flow are Sides of the flowing down channels and the perforated plates are considered as non-slip wall conditions for the solid flow and are adiabatic to the solid phase up-surfeces of the solid layers on the perforated plates are considered to be free surfaces at the solid inlet, temperature, volume flow rate and composition of the ore fines are set depending on the simulation case At the solid outlet, a fiilly developed solid flow is assumed. 

---