Hazardous substances exposure routes

Minimal Risk Level (MRL)—An estimate of daily human exposure to a hazardous substance that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of adverse noncancer health effects over a specified route and duration of exposure. 

MRLs are derived for hazardous substances using the no-observed-adverse-effect level/uncertainty factor approach. They are below levels that might cause adverse health effects in the people most sensitive to such chemical-induced effects. MRLs are derived for acute (1-14 days), intermediate (15-364 days), and chronic (365 days and longer) durations and for the oral and inhalation routes of exposure. Currently, MRLs for the dermal route of exposure are not derived because ATSDR has not yet identified a method suitable for this route of exposure. MRLs are generally based on the most sensitive chemical-induced end point considered to be of relevance to humans. Serious health effects (such as irreparable damage to the liver or kidneys, or birth defects) are not used as a basis for establishing MRLs. Exposure to a level above the MRL does not mean that adverse health effects will occur. 

MRLs are derived for hazardous substances using the no-observed-adverse-effect level/uncertainty factor approach. They are below levels that might cause adverse health effects in the people most sensitive to such chemical-induced effects. MRLs are derived for acute (1-14 days), intermediate (15-364 days), and chronic (365 days and longer) durations and for the oral and inhalation routes of exposure. 

A case can often be made to omit studies as scientifically unnecessary, because it is possible to conduct an adequate risk assessment without them. This is most often the case if the substance decomposes to degradants of known hazardous properties. For example the substance may hydrolyse rapidly to non-toxic products, so the key issue is to establish that this happens rapidly in the stomach before the parent substance can be absorbed. There may then be a case for omitting the expensive long-term animal studies, providing it is also established that there is no dermal or inhalation absorption from these exposure routes. In a similar way, it may be justified to omit ecotoxicity studies on a substance which hydrolyses or otherwise decomposes in the aquatic environment to stable products that have already been tested. 

If an explosion or other incident releases hazardous substances into the air, the most likely route of exposure is through inhalation of airborne contaminants. If the... 

---