Hartree-Fock theory approximation

The first cell in the last tow of the table represents the Hartree-Fock limit the best approximation that can be achieved without taking electron correlation into account. Its location on the chart is rather far from the exact solution. Although in some cases, quite good results can be achieved with Hartree-Fock theory alone, in many others, its performance ranges from orfly fair to quite poor. We ll look at some these cases in Chapters 5 and 6. 

Finally, we should note Koopmans theorem (Koopmans, 1934) which provides a physical interpretation of the orbital energies e from equation (1-24) it states that the orbital energy e obtained from Hartree-Fock theory is an approximation of minus the ionization energy associated with the removal of an electron from that particular orbital i. e., 8 = EN - Ey.j = —IE(i). The simple proof of this theorem can be found in any quantum chemistry textbook. 

What does this mean We have replaced the non-local and therefore fairly complicated exchange term of Hartree-Fock theory as given in equation (3-3) by a simple approximate expression which depends only on the local values of the electron density. Thus, this expression represents a density functional for the exchange energy. As noted above, this formula was originally explicitly derived as an approximation to the HF scheme, without any reference to density functional theory. To improve the quality of this approximation an adjustable, semiempirical parameter a was introduced into the pre-factor Cx which leads to the Xa or Hartree-Fock-Slater (HFS) method which enjoyed a significant amount of popularity among physicists, but never had much impact in chemistry,... 

Most semi-empirical models are based on the fundamental equations of Hartree-Fock theory. In the following section, we develop these equations for a molecular system composed of A nuclei and N electrons in the stationary state. Assuming that the atomic nuclei are fixed in space (the Born-Oppenheimer approximation), the electronic wavefunction obeys the time-independent Schrodinger equation ... 

In this minimal END approximation, the electronic basis functions are centered on the average nuclear positions, which are dynamical variables. In the limit of classical nuclei, these are conventional basis functions used in molecular electronic structure theory, and they follow the dynamically changing nuclear positions. As can be seen from the equations of motion discussed above the evolution of the nuclear positions and momenta is governed by Newton-like equations with Hellman-Feynman forces, while the electronic dynamical variables are complex molecular orbital coefficients that follow equations that look like those of the time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) approximation [24]. The coupling terms in the dynamical metric are the well-known nonadiabatic terms due to the fact that the basis moves with the dynamically changing nuclear positions. 

The difference between the Hartree-Fock energy and the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation (Figure 60), the so-called correlation energy, can be calculated approximately within the Hartree-Fock theory by the configuration interaction method (Cl) or by a perturbation theoretical approach (Mpller-Plesset perturbation calculation wth order, MPn). Within a Cl calculation the wave function is composed of a linear combination of different Slater determinants. Excited-state Slater determinants are then generated by exciting electrons from the filled SCF orbitals to the virtual ones ... 

If we understand FM or magnetic properties of quark matter more deeply, we must proceeds to a self-consistent approach, like Hartree-Fock theory, beyond the previous perturbative argument. In ref. [11] we have described how the axial-vector mean field (AV) and the tensor one appear as a consequence of the Fierz transformation within the relativistic mean-field theory for nuclear matter, which is one of the nonperturbative frameworks in many-body theories and corresponds to the Hatree-Fock approximation. We also demonstrated... 

There is also a hierarchy of electron correlation procedures. The Hartree-Fock (HF) approximation neglects correlation of electrons with antiparallel spins. Increasing levels of accuracy of electron correlation treatment are achieved by Mpller-Plesset perturbation theory truncated at the second (MP2), third (MP3), or fourth (MP4) order. Further inclusion of electron correlation is achieved by methods such as quadratic configuration interaction with single, double, and (perturbatively calculated) triple excitations [QCISD(T)], and by the analogous coupled cluster theory [CCSD(T)] [8],... 

The usual first ah initio approximation to the wave function leads to the Hartree-Fock theory, where V molecular spin orbitals (. with one for each electron. Then, asking the question what is the single determinant solution with the lowest possible energy, we obtain the Hartree-Fock equations and density, ... 

In the self-consistent field linear response method [25,46,48] also known as random phase approximation (RPA) [49] or first order polarization propagator approximation [25,46], which is equivalent to the coupled Hartree-Fock theory [50], the reference state is approximated by the Hartree-Fock self-consistent field wavefunction < scf) and the set of operators /i j consists of single excitation and de-excitation operators with respect to orbital rotation operators [51],... 

Equations (3.20) and (3.21) represent an identity in Hartree-Fock theory. (The Hellmann-Feynman and virial theorems are satisfied by Hartree-Fock wavefunc-tions.) The particular interest offered by (3.21) lies in the fact that 7 = 1 appears to be the characteristic homogeneity of both Thomas-Fermi [62,75,76] and local density functional theory [77], in which case (3.20) gives the Ruedenberg approximation [78], E = v,e,-, while (3.21) gives the Politzer formula [79], E = Vne-... 

Hartree—Fock Theory. In the lowest electronic state of most stable molecules the n orbitals of lowest energy are all doubly occupied, thus forming a closed shell. If, at least as a first approximation, such an electronic state is described by a single configuration, the wave function for this state can be written as... 

In the last chapter, the full formalism of Hartree-Fock theory was developed. While this theory is impressive as a physical and mathematical construct, it has several limitations in a practical sense. Particularly during the early days of computational chemistry, when computational power was minimal, carrying out HF calculations without any further approximations, even for small systems with small basis sets, was a challenging task. 

Hartree-Fock theory makes the fundamental approximation that each electron moves in the static electric field created by all of die other electrons, and then proceeds to optimize orbitals for all of the electrons in a self-consistent fashion subject to a variational constraint. The resulting wave function, when operated upon by the Hamiltonian, delivers as its expectation value the lowest possible energy for a single-detenninantal wave function formed from the chosen basis set. 

---