Hartree-Fock approximation calculation

Within the Hartree-Fock approximation, calculations on molecules have almost all used the matrix SCF method, in which the HF orbitals are expanded in terms of a finite basis set of functions. Direct numerical solution of the HF equations, routine for atoms, has, however, been thought too difficult, but McCullough has shown that, for diatomic molecules, a partial numerical integration procedure will yield very good results.102 In particular, the Heg results agree well with the usual calculations, and it is claimed that the orbitals are likely to be of more nearly uniform accuracy than in the matrix HF calculations. Extensions to larger molecules should be very interesting so far, published results are available for He, Heg, and LiH. 

Another distinguishing aspect of MO methods is the extent to which they deal with electron correlation. The Hartree-Fock approximation does not deal with correlation between individual electrons, and the results are expected to be in error because of this, giving energies above the exact energy. MO methods that include electron correlation have been developed. The calculations are usually done using MoUer-Plesset perturbation theoiy and are designated MP calculations." ... 

Considering the different calculated values for an individual complex in Table 11, it seems appropriate to comment on the accuracy achievable within the Hartree-Fock approximation, with respect to both the limitations inherent in the theory itself and also to the expense one is willing to invest into basis sets. Clearly the Hartree-Fock-Roothaan expectation values have a uniquely defined meaning only as long as a complete set of basis functions is used. In practice, however, one is forced to truncate the expansion of the wave function at a point demanded by the computing facilities available. Some sources of error introduced thereby, namely ghost effects and the inaccurate description of ligand properties, have already been discussed in Chapter II. Here we concentrate on the... 

Apparently, a large number of successful relativistic configuration-interaction (RCI) and multi-reference Dirac-Hartree-Fock (MRDHF) calculations [27] reported over the last two decades are supposedly based on the DBC Hamiltonian. This apparent success seems to contradict the earlier claims of the CD. As shown by Sucher [18,28], in fact the RCI and MRDHF calculations are not based on the DBC Hamiltonian, but on an approximation to a more fundamental Hamiltonian based on QED which does not suffer from the CD. At this point, let us defer further discussion until we review the many-fermion Hamiltonians derived from QED. 

Below is a brief review of the published calculations of yttrium ceramics based on the ECM approach. In studies by Goodman et al. [20] and Kaplan et al. [25,26], the embedded quantum clusters, representing the YBa2Cu307 x ceramics (with different x), were calculated by the discrete variation method in the local density approximation (EDA). Although in these studies many interesting results were obtained, it is necessary to keep in mind that the EDA approach has a restricted applicability to cuprate oxides, e.g. it does not describe correctly the magnetic properties [41] and gives an inadequate description of anisotropic effects [42,43]. Therefore, comparative ab initio calculations in the frame of the Hartree-Fock approximation are desirable. 

Hartree-Fock (HF) calculations. This approximation imposes two constraints in order to solve the SchrOdinger equation and thus obtain the energy (a) a limited basis set in the orbital expansion and (b) a single assignment of electrons to orbitals. 

In quantum chemistry, the correlation energy Ecorr is defined as Econ = exact HF- In Order to Calculate the correlation energy of our system, we show how to calculate the ground state using the Hartree-Fock approximation. The main idea is to expand the exact wavefunction in the form of a configuration interaction picture. The first term of this expansion corresponds to the Hartree-Fock wavefunction. As a first step we calculate the spin-traced one-particle density matrix [5] (IPDM) y ... 

The Hartree-Fock approximation also provided the basis for what are now commonly referred to as semi-empirical models. These introduce additional approximations as well as empirical parameters to greatly simplify the calculations, with minimal adverse effect on the results. While this goal has yet to be fully realized, several useful schemes have resulted, including the popular AMI and PM3 models. Semi-empirical models have proven to be successful for the calculation of equilibrium geometries, including the geometries of transition-metal compounds. They are, however, not satisfactory for thermochemical calculations or for conformational assignments. Discussion is provided in Section n. 

See [11] for a recent review of applications of even-tempered basis set to the calculation of accurate molecular polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities within the matrix Hartree-Fock approximation. In [11] the results finite basis set Hartree-Fock calculations are compared with finite difference Hartree-Fock calculations. 

Calculations show that cross-sections obtained in the Hartree-Fock approximation utilizing length and velocity forms of the appropriate operator, may essentially differ from each other for transitions between neighbouring outer shells, particularly with the same n. However, they are usually close to each other in the case of photoionization or excitation from an inner shell whose wave function is almost orthogonal with the relevant function of the outer open shell. In dipole approximation an electron from a shell lN may be excited to V = l + 1, but the channel /— / + prevails. For configurations ni/f1 n2l 2 an important role is... 

A measure of the extent to which any particular ab initio calculation does not deal perfectly with electron correlation is the correlation energy. In a canonical exposition [79] Lowdin defined correlation energy thus The correlation energy for a certain state with respect to a specified Hamiltonian is the difference between the exact eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian and its expectation value in the Hartree-Fock approximation for the state under consideration. This is usually taken to be the energy from a nonrelativistic but otherwise perfect quantum mechanical procedure, minus the energy calculated by the Hartree-Fock method with the same nonrelativistic Hamiltonian and a huge ( infinite ) basis set ... 

Let us look at the calculation of the dipole moment within the Hartree-Fock approximation. The quantum mechanical analogue of Eq. (5.205) for the electrons in a molecule is... 

---