Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hamiltonian diagrams

This expression may be interpreted in a very similar spirit to tliat given above for one-photon processes. Now there is a second interaction with the electric field and the subsequent evolution is taken to be on a third surface, with Hamiltonian H. In general, there is also a second-order interaction with the electric field through which returns a portion of the excited-state amplitude to surface a, with subsequent evolution on surface a. The Feymnan diagram for this second-order interaction is shown in figure Al.6.9. [Pg.242]

J. Hafner. From Hamiltonians to Phase Diagrams. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1987). [Pg.169]

Phase transitions in adsorbed layers often take place at low temperatures where quantum effects are important. A method suitable for the study of phase transitions in such systems is PIMC (see Sec. IV D). Next we study the gas-liquid transition of a model fluid with internal quantum states. The model [193,293-300] is intended to mimic an adsorbate in the limit of strong binding and small corrugation. No attempt is made to model any real adsorbate realistically. Despite the crudeness of the model, it has been shown by various previous investigations [193,297-300] that it captures the essential features also observed in real adsorbates. For example, the quite complex phase diagram of the model is in qualitative agreement with that of real substances. The Hamiltonian is given by... [Pg.98]

In other words that a negaton initially in a state of momentum p, energy Vp2 + m2 helicity s, would remain forever in that state (since it does not interact with anything). Let us, however, compute the left-hand side of Eq. (11-123) with the -matrix given in terms of the interaction hamiltonian (11-121). To lowest order the diagrams indicated in Fig. 11-6 contribute and give rise to the following contribution to the matrix element of S between one-particle states... [Pg.660]

Now we consider thermodynamic properties of the system described by the Hamiltonian (2.4.5) it is a generalized Hamiltonian of the isotropic Ashkin-Teller model100,101 expressed in terms of interactions between pairs of spins lattice site nm of a square lattice. Hamiltonian (2.4.5) differs from the known one in that it includes not only the contribution from the four-spin interaction (the term with the coefficient J3), but also the anisotropic contribution (the term with the coefficient J2) which accounts for cross interactions of spins a m and s m between neighboring lattice sites. This term is so structured that it vanishes if there are no fluctuation interactions between cr- and s-subsystems. As a result, with sufficiently small coefficients J2, we arrive at a typical phase diagram of the isotropic Ashkin-Teller model,101 102 limited by the plausible values of coefficients in Eq. (2.4.6). At J, > J3, the phase transition line... [Pg.44]

There is no proper perturbative basis for the mnemonic diagram in Fig. 3.58, because the non-orthogonal unperturbed orbitals cannot correspond to any physical (Hermitian) unperturbed Hamiltonian operator,79 as illustrated in Examples 3.17 and 3.18 below. The PMO interpretation of Fig. 3.58 therefore rests on an nnphysical starting point. Removal of orbital overlap (to restore Hermiticity) eliminates the supposed effect. 80... [Pg.230]

The local-to-normal transition is governed by the same parameter of Eq. (4.30). The difference is that now the local-to-normal transition occurs simultaneously for the stretching and bending vibrations. The correlation diagram for stretching vibrations is the same as in Figure 4.3. The local-to-normal transition can also be studied for XYZ molecules, for which the Hamiltonian does not have the condition A) = A2 and is... [Pg.95]

Obviously, we gain precisely the same expressions as in the multi-root theory since we postulated the same form of the effective Hamiltonian. We recall that all matrix elements of the effective Hamiltonian are expressed by means of connected diagrams only in the case of diagonal elements just connected vacuum diagrams may come into consideration and in the case of off-diagonal elements at least one part of a disconnected diagram would correspond to an internal excitation. [Pg.85]


See other pages where Hamiltonian diagrams is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.2382]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.656]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.102]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.84 ]




SEARCH



Hamiltonian equations diagrams

Hamiltonian systems transition diagram

© 2024 chempedia.info