Ground-state theory, method

One obvious drawback of the LDA-based band theory is that the self-interaction term in the Coulomb interaction is not completely canceled out by the approximate self-exchange term, particularly in the case of a tightly bound electron system. Next, the discrepancy is believed to be due to the DFT which is a ground-state theory, because we have to treat quasi-particle states in the calculation of CPs. To correct these drawbacks the so-called self-interaction correction (SIC) [6] and GW-approximation (GWA) [7] are introduced in the calculations of CPs and the full-potential linearized APW (FLAPW) method [8] is employed to find out the effects. No established formula is known to take into account the SIC. 

Several years ago Caspar [11] proposed a parameter-free exchange potential in the ground-state theory. This method is applied to determine the... 

Density functional theory [1] in its original form is a ground-state theory which is valid for the lowest-energy state in each symmetry class [2,3]. It was, however, applied to excited states as well, starting with the transition state method of Slater... 

In order to perform calculations one needs explicit expressions for the functionals. In the ground-state theory, exchange can be treated exactly (or very accurately) via the optimized potential method [60] (or KLI method [61]). Now, these methods are combined with density scaling for a single excited state. 

Wlien first proposed, density llinctional theory was not widely accepted in the chemistry conununity. The theory is not rigorous in the sense that it is not clear how to improve the estimates for the ground-state energies. For wavefiinction-based methods, one can include more Slater detenuinants as in a configuration interaction approach. As the wavellmctions improve via the variational theorem, the energy is lowered. In density fiinctional theory, there is no... 

To use direct dynamics for the study of non-adiabatic systems it is necessary to be able to efficiently and accurately calculate electronic wave functions for excited states. In recent years, density functional theory (DFT) has been gaining ground over traditional Hartree-Fock based SCF calculations for the treatment of the ground state of large molecules. Recent advances mean that so-called time-dependent DFT methods are now also being applied to excited states. Even so, at present, the best general methods for the treatment of the photochemistry of polyatomic organic molecules are MCSCF methods, of which the CASSCF method is particularly powerful. 

The premise behind DFT is that the energy of a molecule can be determined from the electron density instead of a wave function. This theory originated with a theorem by Hoenburg and Kohn that stated this was possible. The original theorem applied only to finding the ground-state electronic energy of a molecule. A practical application of this theory was developed by Kohn and Sham who formulated a method similar in structure to the Hartree-Fock method. 

Ah initio methods are applicable to the widest variety of property calculations. Many typical organic molecules can now be modeled with ah initio methods, such as Flartree-Fock, density functional theory, and Moller Plesset perturbation theory. Organic molecule calculations are made easier by the fact that most organic molecules have singlet spin ground states. Organics are the systems for which sophisticated properties, such as NMR chemical shifts and nonlinear optical properties, can be calculated most accurately. 

The ab initio methods used by most investigators include Hartree-Fock (FFF) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) [6, 7]. An ab initio method typically uses one of many basis sets for the solution of a particular problem. These basis sets are discussed in considerable detail in references [1] and [8]. DFT is based on the proof that the ground state electronic energy is determined completely by the electron density [9]. Thus, there is a direct relationship between electron density and the energy of a system. DFT calculations are extremely popular, as they provide reliable molecular structures and are considerably faster than FFF methods where correlation corrections (MP2) are included. Although intermolecular interactions in ion-pairs are dominated by dispersion interactions, DFT (B3LYP) theory lacks this term [10-14]. FFowever, DFT theory is quite successful in representing molecular structure, which is usually a primary concern. 

Furthermore, LandS s theory only represents a first-order approximation, and the L and S quantum numbers only behave as good quantum numbers when spin-orbit coupling is neglected. It is interesting to note that the most modem method for establishing the atomic ground state and its configuration is neither chemical nor spectroscopic in the usual sense of the word but makes use of atomic beam techniques (38). 

An excited state of a molecule can be regarded as a distinct chemical species, different from the ground state of the same molecule and from other excited states. It is obvious that we need some method of naming excited states. Unfortunately, there are several methods in use, depending on whether one is primarily interested in photochemistry, spectroscopy, or MO theory." One of the most common methods... 

---