Goethite precipitation

Figure 4 Change in pH as a function of the amount of pyrite oxidized under four scenarios (i) pyrite oxidizes to an acid ferrous sulfate solution without any further oxidation (solid line) (ii) pyrite oxidizes and the resultant ferrous sulfate solution is allowed to oxidize, hut no precipitation is allowed (upper dashed line) (iii) pyrite oxidizes, the ferrous sulfate solution oxidizes and precipitates ferrihydrite (p-Ksp = 4.89, lower dashed line) and (iv) pyrite oxidizes, ferrous sulfate solution oxidizes, and goethite precipitates (dotted line). Computed with PHREEQCI at 25 °C and 1 har, thermodynamic data from Nordstrom et al. (1990).

Examples of both homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation exist in the iron oxide system. Goethite precipitates directly from soluble ferric species in solution. Its formation can, however, be assisted by addition of seed crystals of goethite to the system. As the interplanar spacings in the... 

FeOOH goethite precipitated from nitrate O.I mol dm NaCl 20... 

Since the goethite contains both an amount of water insoluble zinc and an amount of water-soluble zinc, it was decided to investigate the influence of the zinc present in the goethite on the hardness. The quantity of soluble zinc depends on the degree of washing of the filter cake that is obtained after the goethite precipitation step in the zinc process. 

Ferrihydrite Dehydration leads to instability goethite Precipitate at ambient temperature Fe (III) to Fe (II) Recrystallization Biogeochemical reduction... 

Iron Oxide Reds. From a chemical point of view, red iron oxides are based on the stmcture of hematite, a-Fe202, and can be prepared in various shades, from orange through pure red to violet. Different shades are controlled primarily by the oxide s particle si2e, shape, and surface properties. Production. Four methods are commercially used in the preparation of iron oxide reds two-stage calcination of FeS047H2 O precipitation from an aqueous solution thermal dehydration of yellow goethite, a-FeO(OH) and oxidation of synthetic black oxide, Fe O. ... 

The goethite process precipitates crystalline aFeO-OH (goethite) as well as PFeO-OH, aFe202, and amorphous phases. The reaction is carried out at 90°C and pH 3.0, for 4—6 h in either batch or continuous fashion, and the iron(III) ion must be kept <1 g/L. Both jarosite and goethite soHds are usually lagooned. 

Ivanovich M, Harmon RS (eds) Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 34-61 Giammar DE, Hering JG (2001) Time scales for sorption-desorption and surface precipitation of uranyl on goethite. Environ Sci Technol 35 3332-3337... 

The alkali process uses sodium hydroxide and is well known as Bayer s process. It involves relatively simple inorganic and physical chemistry and the entire flowsheet can be divided into caustic digestion, clarification, precipitation and calcination. Although mineral assemblage in bauxites is extensive, processing conditions are primarily influenced by the relative proportions of alumina minerals (gibbsite and boehmite), the iron minerals (goethite and hematite), and the silica minerals (quartz and clays-usually as kaolinite). 

In the goethite process, the precipitation of iron from solution occurs in the form of hydrated ferric oxide, FeOOH. The commercial development of the process was due to Societe de La Vielle Montagne. The process basically involves the reduction of iron to the ferrous state, and this is followed by oxidation by air at a temperature of around 90 °C and at a pH controlled at around 3.0. The reaction can chemically be shown as ... 

In the ultimate analysis it may be pointed that the aforesaid hydrolysis processes are no doubt technically very satisfactory and tolerable, but environmentally this is not the case. The different processes yield jarosite, goethite and hematite, all of which retain considerable amounts of other elements, especially, zinc and sulfur. The zinc originates mainly from undissolved zinc roast in the iron residues, and sulfur from sulfate, which is either embodied into the crystal lattice or adsorbed in the precipitate. As a consequence of the association of the impurities, none of these materials is suitable for iron making and therefore they must be disposed of by dumping. The extent of soluble impurities present in the iron residues means that environmentally safe disposal not an easy task, and increasing concern is being voiced about these problems. An alternative way of removing iron from... 

In the wetlands of Idaho, the formation of an Fe(III) precipitate (plaque) on the surface of aquatic plant roots (Typha latifolia, cat tail and Phalaris arundinacea, reed canary grass) may provide a means of attenuation and external exclusion of metals and trace elements (Hansel et al, 2002). Iron oxides were predominantly ferrihydrite with lesser amounts of goethite and minor levels of siderite and lepidocrocite. Both spatial and temporal correlations between As and Fe on the root surfaces were observed and arsenic existed as arsenate-iron hydroxide complexes (82%). 

Addition of sufficient base to give a > 3 to a ferric solution immediately leads to precipitation of a poorly ordered, amorphous, red-brown ferric hydroxide precipitate. This synthetic precipitate resembles the mineral ferrihydrite, and also shows some similarity to the iron oxyhydroxide core of ferritin (see Chapter 6). Ferrihydrite can be considered as the least stable but most reactive form of iron(III), the group name for amorphous phases with large specific surface areas (>340 m2 /g). We will discuss the transformation of ferrihydrite into other more-crystalline products such as goethite and haematite shortly, but we begin with some remarks concerning the biological distribution and structure of ferrihydrite (Jambor and Dutrizac, 1998). 

Despite the seeming exactitude of the mathematical development, the modeler should bear in mind that the double layer model involves uncertainties and data limitations in addition to those already described (Chapter 2). Perhaps foremost is the nature of the sorbing material itself. The complexation reactions are studied in laboratory experiments performed using synthetically precipitated ferric oxide. This material ripens with time, changing in water content and extent of polymerization. It eventually begins to crystallize to form goethite (FeOOH). 

In a second example, we calculate how pH affects sorption onto hydrous ferric oxide, expanding on our discussion (Section 10.4) of Dzombak and Morel s (1990) surface complexation model. We start as before, setting the dataset of surface reactions, suppressing the ferric minerals hematite (Fe203) and goethite (FeOOH), and specifying the amount of ferric oxide [represented in the calculation by Fe(OH)3 precipitate] in the system... 

This discrepancy might be explained if after about an hour the reaction approached equilibrium and slowed due to a diminishing thermodynamic drive. If the Fe+++ produced did not precipitate on the hematite surface, and did not form either hematite or goethite (FeOOH), it would accumulate in solution and weaken the drive for uranyl reduction. As the saturation index for hematite reached about 1.7, or about 1.25 for goethite, reaction would cease. 

KEYWORDS Acid mine drainage (AMD),chemical instability, ochre-precipitates, schwertmannite, goethite. 

---