Geometric calculations

At this time diffraction data for ion-ion distributions in aqueous solutions of moderate concentration are beginning to become available. In aqueous NiCl2 solutions very refined neutron diffraction studies indicate that the Ni2+-Cl pair correlation function has a peak near 3.l8 under conditions in which the Cl does not penetrate the Ni(H20)g2+ unit. (J+2 ) It is reported that EXAFS studies give the same result. (1 3) While the information is most welcome it is puzzling because a geometrical calculation indicates that the closest center to center distance for the Ni2+ and a Cl that does not penetrate the hydration shell is closer to 3.98. (7)... 

Pore diameter (dp) for channel-like PMSs according to the BJH pore size distribution, which, however, underestimates the effective pore diameter by circa 1.0 nm, as shown by theoretical and geometrical calculations [48, 49] pore diameter of cage-like PMSs according to Ravikovitch and Neimark [50],... 

Geometrically Calculated Coordination Numbers (Space Filling) lor Univalent... 

SOLUTION We begin by performing a few geometric calculations. The cross-sectional area of the column is... 

Complete isotherms measured 138 and 150 K show that the first layer for Xe consists of two substeps [64]. By comparing the coverages at the completion of each of these substeps to the results of geometric calculations conducted for different scenarios, the authors concluded that Xe does not adsorb on the ICs. 

For the Tracer 4 curve, the flat top occurred from approximately 122 to 162 pL. Surprisingly, this volume was not near the geometrically calculated 42.2-65.7 pL volume. The 40 pL width of the flat top was in the range of the sum of the two inj ector volumes, approximately 60 pL. H owever, the full width at half maximum, ... 

If an absorption phenomenon is occurring, changing the materials of construction of the wetted surfaces could impact the results. The best reactor results (in which the reactor volume based on the tracer analysis most closely matches the geometrically calculated reactor volume) were attained with stainless steel materials of constmction. The injector loops, tubing from the injectors to the mixing tee, and the reactor were all changed to stainless steel materials of construction of equivalent volumes. The flat top experiments were repeated for this configuration Fig. 13.10 shows the results. 

As shown, the stainless steel system gave the maximum concentration from approximately 50 to 94 pL. This was much closer to the geometrically calculated... 

For this high throughput serial screening approach to succeed, the observed discrepancy between geometrically calculated and experimentally measured reactor volumes must be resolved. If this issue cannot be resolved, quantitative reaction rate data cannot be generated using the pulse injection mode of operation. 

Our nonflow geometrical calculation showed that A>3d for the cylinder breaking into two equally spaced spherical drops with d > 3a, again a surprisingly close bound. We recall that these bounds were derived from the argument that a decrease in the jet surface area would tend to drive the free energy to a minimum and thereby release surface energy. 

---