Genomism and the Nature Trail

Where to go from here, how to obtain evidence for these ideas and how can one know that the blackboard discussion it is not the harebrained scheme I was assured it was after the first contact with members of the old guard. Clearly, there is no experiment that can test the grand picture of evolution and the evidence is strewn everywhere without labels. Now, would it be time to join the searchers that are tilling the landscape for evidence  

Away from all this, but not too far, is a fossil bone fragment, buried in a two-million-year-old earth formation, which may have belonged to one of our purported ancestors , Homo habilis. Someone else contends that this was not H. habilis but rather H. erectus, pointing at the facial angle and the teeth. The discoverer again points at the 

The Genomic Potential Hypothesis A Chemist s View of the Origins, Evolution and Unfolding of Life, by Christian Schwabe. 2001 Eurekah.com 

If evidence has so little authority about it because it cannot come to life but through our imagination, then one must admit that ideas are the core of our drive toward discovery. Theories cannot be proven and they remain true until falsified by factual and conceptual incongruity.2 Evidence has a crucial role in denying a hypothesis, but if observations are not so reliable on the pro side how could they be more authoritative on the nay side The proposal that X came into existence via path Y requires one to exclude all other possibilities. Conversely, the statement that X is not produced by path Y requires one merely to exclude Y, which is in principle much less involved. 

Concepts may have quite an independent life. Relativity was a purely theoretical entity before the first measurement confirmed the idea. Of course, we need experiments to solidify our mental constructs but we do not need experimental proof if there are 

---