Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

General Parametrization of Unitary Transformations

After the free-particle Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation the magnitude of the small component [Pg.447]

We have already seen that the free-particle Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation can be expressed in a couple of ways which seem very different at first sight. The only boundary for the explicit choice of a unitary transformation is that the off-diagonal blocks and therefore all odd operators vanish. If many different choices are possible — and we will see in the following that this is actually the case — the question arises how are they related and what this implies for the resulting Hamiltonians. [Pg.447]

In general, a unitary transformation U can be parametrized by an odd and antihermitean operator W. The antihermiticity of this operator W, [Pg.447]


Within any decoupling scheme there are only a few restrictions on the choice of the transformations U. First, they have to be unitary and analytic (holomorphic) functions on a suitable domain of the one-electron Hilbert space V, since any parametrization has necessarily to be expanded in a Taylor series around W = 0 for the sake of comparability but also for later application in nested decoupling procedures (see chapter 12). Second, they have to permit a decomposition of in even terms of well-defined order in a given expansion parameter of the Hamiltonian (such as 1/c or V). It is thus possible to parametrize U without loss of generality by a power-series ansatz in terms of an antihermitean operator W, where unitarity of the resulting power series is the only constraint. In the next section this most general parametrization of U is discussed. [Pg.449]

By using the general power series expansion for U all the infinitely many parametrizations of a unitary transformation are treated on an equal footing. However, the question about the equivalence of these parametrizations for application in decoupling Dirac-like one-electron operators needs to be studied. It is furthermore not clear a priori whether the antihermitean matrix W can always be chosen in the appropriate way the mandatory properties of W, i.e., its oddness, antihermiticity and behavior as a certain power in the chosen expansion parameter, have to be checked for every single transformation U applied to the untransformed or any pre-transformed Hamiltonian. Since the even expansion coefficients follow from the odd coefficients, the radius of convergence Rc of the power series depends strongly on the choice of the odd coefficients. [Pg.450]

For simplicity it has been assumed that all unitary transformations Lf, feature the same parametrization with = 1, i.e., the cubic coefficient is the first coefficient to be chosen freely. The odd operators Wi = W (A = 0) are the familiar perturbation-independent operators parametrizing the standard unitary DKH transformations Lfj see chapter 12. As an important consequence, no terms containing the energy-damped property (X) occur within Xdkhoo-In order to emphasize this general structure and to avoid any misconceptions, we give the explicit expression of the first-order term of the transformed property [764],... [Pg.590]


See other pages where General Parametrization of Unitary Transformations is mentioned: [Pg.447]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.110]   


SEARCH



General Transformations

Parametric

Parametrization

Parametrization of

Transformation unitary

Unitary general parametrization

© 2024 chempedia.info