Frontier orbital theory electron densities

None of the above results addresses the question of the position of reaction in the aromatic molecule. In DFT this is done by considering the Fukui function,/. It is interesting that this orientation problem was also the topic of the first paper on frontier orbital theoryReaction was predicted to occur at the position of highest frontier orbital (FO) electron density. The frontier orbital in electrophilic substitution would be the HOMO. If this orbital were written as the usual linear combination of atomic orbitals, then the density at each atom would simply be the square of the coefficient in the LCAO, or c where i indicates the atom. Since this is also one of the ways of approximating / the success of the FO method may also be claimed for DFT. However, the details of the Fukui function application will be postponed briefly to look at a method unique to density functional theory, and using the concept of hardness. ... 

Naphthalene undergoes electrophihc substitutions at the a rather than p position. The Hueckel molecular orbital calculations show that all the carbons have the same jt electron density 1.0. This is not in agreement with the theory of organic reactions based on the Coulombic interaction that electrophilic attack occurs on the most negatively charged atom. Fukui [7] proposed the frontier orbital theory for the discrepancy between the theory and the experimental observation. The importance of... 

The only cases for which one might anticipate differences between DFT and wavefunction theory as regards visualization (Sections 5.5.6 and 6.3.6) are those involving orbitals as explained in Section 7.2.3.2, The Kohn-Sham equations, the orbitals of currently popular DFT methods were introduced to make the calculation of the electron density tractable, but in pure DFT theory orbitals would not exist. Thus electron density, spin density, and electrostatic potential can be visualized in Kohn-Sham DFT calculations just as in ab initio or semiempirical work. However, visualization of orbitals, so important in wavefunction work (especially the HOMO and FUMO, which in frontier orbital theory [154] strongly influence reactivity) does not seem possible in a pure DFT approach, one in which wavefunctions are not invoked. In currently popular DFT calculations one can visualize the Kohn-Sham orbitals, which are qualitatively much like wavefunction orbitals [130] (Section 7.3.5, Ionization energies and electron affinities). 

Density functional theory (DFT) provides an efficient method to include correlation energy in electronic structure calculations, namely the Kohn-Sham method 1 in addition, it constitutes a solid support to reactivity models.2 DFT framework has been used to formalize empirical reactivity descriptors, such as electronegativity,3 hardness4 and electrophilicity index.5 The frontier orbital theory was generalized by the introduction of Fukui function,6 and new reactivity parameters have also been proposed.7,8 Moreover, relationships between those parameters have been found, and general methods to relate new quantities exist.9... 

Abstract. The development of theories for interpreting the course of chemical reactions is one of the most important achievements of theoretical chemistry in the twentieth century. I selected the paper by Fukui et al. from 1952, proposing the frontier electron density as the reactivity index for the orientation of electrophilic substitution reactions. This paper may be regarded as a bridge between an older reactivity theory, the electronic theory of organic chemistry, and new ones predicting the stereochemical courses of reactions such as frontier orbital theory and the Woodward-Hoffmann rule. 

The chemical potential, chemical hardness and sofmess, and reactivity indices have been nsed by a number of workers to assess a priori the reactivity of chemical species from their intrinsic electronic properties. Perhaps one of the most successful and best known methods is the frontier orbital theory of Fukui [1,2]. Developed further by Parr and Yang [3], the method relates the reactivity of a molecule with respect to electrophilic or nucleophilic attack to the charge density arising from the highest occupied molecular orbital or lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, respectively. Parr and coworkers [4,5] were able to use these Fukui indices to deduce the hard and soft (Lewis) acids and bases principle from theoretical principles, providing one of the first applications of electronic structure theory to explain chemical reactivity. In essentially the same form, the Fukui functions (FFs) were used to predict the molecular chemical reactivity of a number of systems including Diels-Alder condensations [6,7], monosubstituted benzenes [8], as well as a number of model compounds [9,10]. Recent applications are too numerous to catalog here but include silylenes [11], pyridinium ions [12], and indoles [13]. 

It is important to realize that whenever qualitative or frontier molecular orbital theory is invoked, the description is within the orbital (Hartree-Fock or Density Functional) model for the electronic wave function. In other words, rationalizing a trend in computational results by qualitative MO theory is only valid if the effect is present at the HF or DFT level. If the majority of the variation is due to electron correlation, an explanation in terms of interacting orbitals is not appropriate. 

The first paper of the frontier-electron theory pointed out that the electrophilic aromatic substitution in aromatic hydrocarbons should take place at the position of the greatest density of electrons in the highest occupied (HO) molecular orbital (MO). The second paper disclosed that the nucleophilic replacement should occur at the carbon atom where the lowest unoccupied (LU) MO exhibited the maximum density of extension. These particular MO s were called "frontier MO s . In homolytic replacements, both HO and LU.were shown to serve as the frontier MO s. In these papers the "partial" density of 2 pn electron, in the HO (or LU) MO, at a certain carbon atom was simply interpreted by the square of the atomic orbital (AO) coefficient in these particular MO s which were represented by a linear combination (LC) of 2 pn AO s in the frame of the Huckel approximation. These partial densities were named frontier-electron densities . 

The contribution of the frontier orbitals would be maximized in certain special donor-acceptor reactions. The stabilization energy is represented by Eqs. (3.25) and (3.26). Even in a less extreme case, the frontier orbital contribution maybe much more than in the expression of the superdelocalizability. If we adopt the approximation of Eq. (6.3), the intramolecular comparison of reactivity can be made only by the numerator value. In this way, it is understood that the frontier electron density, /r, is qualified to be an intramolecular reactivity index. The finding of the parallelism between fr and the experimental results has thus become the origin of the frontier-electron theory. The definition of fr is hence as follows ... 

Based on the foregoing discussion, one might suppose that the Fukui function is nothing more than a DFT-inspired restatement of frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory. This is not quite true. Because DFT is, in principle, exact, the Fukui function includes effects—notably electron correlation and orbital relaxation—that are a priori neglected in an FMO approach. This is most clear when the electron density is expressed in terms of the occupied Kohn-Sham spin-orbitals [16],... 

This quantity can be viewed as a generalization of Fukui s frontier molecular orbital (MO) concept [25] and plays a key role in linking Frontier MO theory and the HSAB principle. It can be interpreted either as the sensitivity of a system s chemical potential to an external perturbation at a particular point r, or as the change of the electron density p(r) at each point r when the total number of electrons is changed. The former definition has recently been implemented to evaluate this function [26,27] but the derivative of the density with respect to the number of electrons remains by far the most widely used definition. 

Further examination of the results indicated that by invocation of Pearson s Hard-Soft Acid-Base (HSAB) theory (57), the results are consistent with experimental observation. According to Pearson s theory, which has been generalized to include nucleophiles (bases) and electrophiles (acids), interactions between hard reactants are proposed to be dependent on coulombic attraction. The combination of soft reactants, however, is thought to be due to overlap of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the electrophile and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the nucleophile, the so-called frontier molecular orbitals. It was found that, compared to all other positions in the quinone methide, the alpha carbon had the greatest LUMO electron density. It appears, therefore, that the frontier molecular orbital interactions are overriding the unfavorable coulombic conditions. This interpretation also supports the preferential reaction of the sulfhydryl ion over the hydroxide ion in kraft pulping. In comparison to the hydroxide ion, the sulfhydryl is relatively soft, and in Pearson s theory, soft reactants will bond preferentially to soft reactants, while hard acids will favorably combine with hard bases. Since the alpha position is the softest in the entire molecule, as evidenced by the LUMO density, the softer sulfhydryl ion would be more likely to attack this position than the hydroxide. 

Scheme 3-5). Ohya-Nishiguchi et al. (1980) noted that such a large localized spin density is very rare in a ir-electron system of purine s size and should have important application to its chemical reactivity. Reactions such as protonation should take place preferentially at position 6. This was deduced from the result of molecular orbital calculations (Nakajima Pullman 1959). According to Fukui s frontier electron theory (Fukui et al. 1952), such areaction should take place at the position where the frontier electron density is the largest. The calculations clearly indicate that the large electron density is at position 6. Scheme 3-5 describes the protonation of the purine anion radical (Yao Musha 1974). Protonation indeed takes place at position 6. After that, the radical center appears at the cyclic nitrogen in the vicinal 1 position.

Richard Bader was among the earliest of workers to realize the importance of electron density in providing an understanding of chemistry. Early on he was led to formulate the first symmetry rule governing a chemical reaction in answer to the question of how the electron density changes in response to a motion of the nuclei. This rule, termed the pseudo- or second-order Jahn-Teller effect, provides the theoretical underpinnings of frontier molecular orbital theory and is still widely used in discussions of reaction mechanisms and molecular geometries. 

The Fukui function or frontier function was introduced by Parr and Yang in 1984 [144], They generously gave it a name associated with the pioneer of frontier molecular orbital theory, who emphasized the roles of the HOMO and LUMO in chemical reactions. In a reaction a change in electron number clearly involves removing electrons from or adding electrons to the HOMO or LUMO, respectively, i.e. the frontier orbitals whose importance was emphasized by Fukui.4 The mathematical expression (below) of the function defines it as the sensitivity of the electron density at various points in a species to a change in the number of electrons in the species. If electrons are added or removed, how much is the electron density... 

---