Front factors A and

VALUES OF FRONT FACTORS A AND B OF EQN (3.45) ACCORDING TO VARIOUS THEORIES OF RUBBER ELASTICITY... 

The various theories have been critically reviewed (e.g. Smith, 1972 Treloar, 1975) and these provide arguments which would lead one to accept Hermans values of unity for both of the front factors A and B. 

Table 1.5 Front-factor A and functionality Fcalculated for HOPE and LDPE...

Figure 8 (a) Time evolution of the SANS profiles during enzymatic polymerization to cellulose. SANS from the enzyme solution was also included as a reference, (b) Time change in surface characteristics (the surface fractal dimension, Ds, and front factor. A), and monomer conversion. Cm. From Tanaka, H. Koizumi, S. Hashimoto, T. etal. Macromolecules 2007, 40,6304-6315. ... 

For imperfect epoxy-amine or polyoxypropylene-urethane networks (Mc=103-10 ), the front factor, A, in the rubber elasticity theories was always higher than the phantom value which may be due to a contribution by trapped entanglements. The crosslinking density of the networks was controlled by excess amine or hydroxyl groups, respectively, or by addition of monoepoxide. The reduced equilibrium moduli (equal to the concentration of elastically active network chains) of epoxy networks were the same in dry and swollen states and fitted equally well the theory with chemical contribution and A 1 or the phantom network value of A and a trapped entanglement contribution due to the similar shape of both contributions. For polyurethane networks from polyoxypro-pylene triol (M=2700), A 2 if only the chemical contribution was considered which could be explained by a trapped entanglement contribution. 

Figure 9. Reduced equilibrium modulus of polyurethane networks from POP trlols and MDI in dependence on the sol fraction. networks from POP triol Mjj - 708, o networks from POP triol Mjj = 2630. C-) calculated dependence using Flory junction fluctuation theory for the value of the front factor A indicated. (Reproduced from Ref. 57. Copyright 1982 American Chemical Society.)...

Figure 10. Dependence of the reduced equilibrium modulus of POP triol - MDI networks prepared in the presence of diluent. POP triol Mu= 708 stress-strain measurements in the presence of diluent (o) and after evaporation of the diluent ( ). Flory theory for the values of the front factor A indicated, theoretical dependence including trapped interchain constraints Numbers at curves Indicate the value of ry.

Prior to the estimation of the correctness of one or another value, one should understand the physical significance of the front-factor A in Equations 1.24 and 1.56. One variant [112] provides that the A value can be changed within the range of 0.5-1.0, where A = 0.5 corresponds to the case of the so-called phantom network, which displays full freedom of fluctuations of macromolecular entanglements nodes around their middle positions, and A = 1.0 corresponds to the affine network, in which such freedom is completely suppressed. An alternative [113] provides a quantitative relation between value A and functionality F of macromolecular entanglement network nodes ... 

In Figure 1.33 the dependence of the front-factor A value on molecular weight is shown. As follows from the adduced plot, the cluster fluctuations constraint is systematically changed from 1.0 at = 0 to 0.5 at = 3600 g/mole. In other words, if the amorphous phase of a semi-crystalline polymer represents a single cluster (supercluster), fluctuations are completely suppressed, and its behaviour corresponds to the affine model [110]. The value = M = 3600 g/mole corresponds to polyethylene melt [20], where constraints imposed by crystallites are absent, and in this case entanglement network behaviour for polyethylenes corresponds to the phantom alternative [113]. 

Figure 1.33 The dependence of the front-factor A value on molecular weight of a chain part between clusters for (1) LDPE and (2) HDPE [57]...

The fraction pallet is found nearly equal to the volume fraction O for the aggregate (Equations 4.11 and 4.12), which means of course that the front factor a is also close to one for carbon black pellets. 

Another design method uses capture efficiency. There are fewer models for capture efficiency available and none that have been validated over a wide range of conditions. Conroy and Ellenbecker - developed a semi-empirical capture efficiency for flanged slot hoods and point and area sources of contaminant. The point source model uses potential flow theory to describe the flow field in front of a flanged elliptical opening and an empirical factor to describe the turbulent diffusion of contaminant around streamlines. 

The view factor depends on the shape of the emitting surface (plane, cylindrical, spherical, or hemispherical), the distance between emitting and receiving surfaces, and the orientation of these surfaces with respect to each other. In general, the view factor from a differential plane dAj) to a flame front (area A,) on a distance L is determined (Figure 3.10) by ... 

The temperature distribution has a characteristic maximum within the liquid domain, which is located in the vicinity of the evaporation front. Such a maximum results from two opposite factors (1) heat transfer from the hot wall to the liquid, and (2) heat removal due to the liquid evaporation at the evaporation front. The pressure drops monotonically in both domains and there is a pressure jump at the evaporation front due to the surface tension and phase change effect on the liquid-vapor interface. 

Only two of the exponents (a and n, for instance) are sufficient to describe the rheology of nearly critical gels. The front factor is more difficult to estimate, but it most likely differs on both sides. 

However, the behaviour near m = raB needs some other explanation. My proposal involves the specific solvation of the backside of the carbenium ion by the strong dipole of the solvent this displaces the monomer molecule which is located there in the absence of the solvent, so that the 7t-bond to the monomer at the front is weakened and the unimolecular isomerization-propagation becomes accelerated, despite the statistical factor which, alone, would produce a deceleration, as explained at the end of Section 3a. As the dilution proceeds from m = raB downwards, the polymerization goes through a dieidic phase, in... 

These expressions are those for a viscoelastic solid and assume the front factor is unity. The relaxation times, ip, are modified from simple Rouse values to allow for the motion of a strand rather than a complete chain. 

It is possible for a potable water source to be connected to the injection zone with no confining layer or impermeable material as a barrier. An example of this can be seen in Fig. 5.2. Injection may continue if the concentrate flows away from the connected aquifer and there is no threat of contamination. Nonetheless, the prediction and knowledge of the movement and final location of the waste front is a crucial factor. 

---