Friction coefficients, defined

Friction Coefficient. In the design of a heat exchanger, the pumping requirement is an important consideration. For a fully developed laminar flow, the pressure drop inside a tube is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the inside tube diameter. For a turbulent flow, the pressure drop is inversely proportional to D where n Hes between 4.8 and 5. In general, the internal tube diameter, plays the most important role in the deterrnination of the pumping requirement. It can be calculated using the Darcy friction coefficient,, defined as... 

Maximum in friction coefficient (defined as ratio of frictional force to normal reaction force) near the PZC was found for alumina [350]. Pristine PZC was used in calculations and friction experiments were performed in 0.02 mol dm" Na2S04, thus the results could be affected by specific sorption of sulfate. Resistivity of alumina dispersions is lower than that of solutions without alumina except in the closest vicinity of the lEP [351]. 

Figure 3 shows the total load dependence of the friction force measured for modulation amplitudes of 50nm and lOOnm. The contact location was arbitrarily chosen on the same surface. Both curves are described by the same Amontons law. The friction coefficient defined by the slope of the linear fit is )li=0.087 0.001. When plotted as the friction force versus the total load, the intercept is zero. It is important at this point to specify that the error associated to the friction coefficient arises from the fitting analysis of our data, which therefore, determines the precision of the experiment and not the overall acuracy of the experiment. Indeed, the main source of uncertainty in our measurements originates in the precision in the cantilever metrics measured by optical microscopy and SEM which is of the order of 3% to 5%. Some other sources (19,28), like the position of the laser spot on the backside of the cantilever affects the absolute accuracy of the friction measurements to an extend that is difficult to evaluate. We expect the overall accuracy on the friction measurement to be less than 60%(25). Nevertheless, since the crucial experimental conditions were optimized and kept constant from an experiment to the other, the comparison remains valid. 

Figure 6 illustrates the load dependance of the friction force in the steady state sliding regime when the tip describes an oscillatory motion at constant velocity. The friction coefficient defined by the slope is in agreement the friction coefficient obtained from figure 5. 

In addition to the intramolecular forces, the chain is subjected to a Brownian force g n,t) due to random collisions with other chains, and an intermolecular frictional force, x(n, t) where < is an atomic friction coefficient. Defining the following Fourier transforms... 

Boundary lubrication is perhaps best defined as the lubrication of surfaces by fluid films so thin that the friction coefficient is affected by both the type of lubricant and the nature of the surface, and is largely independent of viscosity. A fluid lubricant introduced between two surfaces may spread to a microscopically thin film that reduces the sliding friction between the surfaces. The peaks of the high spots may touch, but interlocking occurs only to a limited extent and frictional resistance will be relatively low. 

Friction coefficients will vary for a particular material from the value just as motion starts to the value it attains in motion. The coefficient depends on the surface of the material, whether rough or smooth, as well as the composition of the material. Frequently the surface of a particular plastics will exhibit significantly different friction characteristics from that of a cut surface of the same smoothness. These variations and others that are reviewed make it necessary to do careful testing for an application which relies on the friction characteristics of plastics. Once the friction characteristics are defined, however, they are stable for a particular material fabricated in a stated manner. 

The same nano scratch tester was used to carry out the friction tests. The Rockwell diamond tip (radius 2 /u.m) was used to draw at a constant speed 3 mm/min across the sample surface under a constant load of 20 mN for which no scratches occurred for all the samples. Feedback circuitry in the tester ensures the applied load is kept constant over the sample surface. The sliding distance is 3 mm. The friction coefficient is defined normally as the ratio of the friction force and the applied load. 

The friction coefficient is defined as the tangential force acting on a sliding body to the ground reaction force. For rubbers this is a function of the ground pressure. Its dependence has been discussed sufficiently in the literature where it was shown that this is important for soft rubbers on smooth surfaces [2,3], but is of little influence for tire compounds on roads which are always sufficiently rough for the load dependence to be small if not completely absent [4,5]. 

In order to examine the nature of the friction coefficient it is useful to consider the various time, space, and mass scales that are important for the dynamics of a B particle. Two important parameters that determine the nature of the Brownian motion are rm = (m/M) /2, that depends on the ratio of the bath and B particle masses, and rp = p/(3M/4ttct3), the ratio of the fluid mass density to the mass density of the B particle. The characteristic time scale for B particle momentum decay is xB = Af/ , from which the characteristic length lB = (kBT/M)i lxB can be defined. In derivations of Langevin descriptions, variations of length scales large compared to microscopic length but small compared to iB are considered. The simplest Markovian behavior is obtained when both rm << 1 and rp 1, while non-Markovian descriptions of the dynamics are needed when rm << 1 and rp > 1 [47]. The other important times in the problem are xv = ct2/v, the time it takes momentum to diffuse over the B particle radius ct, and Tp = cr/Df, the time it takes the B particle to diffuse over its radius. 

It should be noted that the acceleration component is dominant in the last part of the pipe, where, because of the rapid pressure drop and the low absolute pressure, the specific volume of the gas increases sharply. This effect is more pronounced at high mass flow rates with large values of mass flow ratio, 3 (= mjm,). As shown in Figures 3.44a and 3.446, the average friction coefficient is affected by the mixture mass flow rate m, the mass flow ratio 3, and the diameter of the pipe D. The Re is defined as... 

Since intersegment hydrodynamic interaction dominates the friction coefficient, we ignore the i = j part that leads to the free-draining contribution. If we define the inverse propagator G according to... 

---