Fresnel factor

The magnitudes of e i =1, )contam the Fresnel factors from equation Bl.5,34. equation B1,5,35 and equation B 1,5.36. which depend on the incident, reflected and polarization angles. Experimentally, one approach is to fix the input polarization and adjust the analyser to obtain a null in the SFl signal [ ]. By choosing distinct configurations such that the corresponding tliree equations from equation B 1.5.40 are linearly independent, the relative values of Xs lim = inferred. This method has... 

The isotropic coefficient and the anisotropic coefficients b(m> and c(m) can have both bulk and surface contributions and depend on crystal symmetry. The linear and nonlinear dielectric constants of the material, as well as the appropriate Fresnel factors at co and 2co, are incorporated into the constants a, b m) and c(m). Table 3.1 shows the susceptibilities contained in each of these constants. The models of Tom... 

In addition to the tensor element dependence of the sum-frequency intensity, there is also a dependence on the geometry of the experiment that manifests itself in the linear and non-linear Fresnel factors that describe the behaviour of the three light beams at the interface. Fresnel factors are the reflection and transmission coefficients for electromagnetic radiation at a boundary and depend on the frequency, polarization and incident angle of the electromagnetic waves and the indices of refraction for the media at the boundary [16,21]. 

IJK refers to the laboratory Cartesian axes. E is the input electric field of the light beams at the surface and is modified by Fresnels factors (see below). The macroscopic susceptibility, has a contribution that varies with incident IR wavelength and is referred to as and a wavelength-invariant component as shown in Eq. (4). 

Fresnel factors also influence the SFG signal by altering the optical field the molecules experience at the surface [38-41]. These Fresnel factors appear in E of (3) and (7). The optical fields, E, are frequently calculated with modified Fres-... 

The MFP for Rvhv(0) and Rhvh(Q) were equivalent for a nematic solution of PBT (9=0.055), except for small difference in amplitude due to the Fresnel factors, and similar in appearance to the MFP at X = 1542 nm shown in Figure 1 for the isotropic sample. This result is expected, since all rays propagate with refractive index no- The analysis using the measured refractive indices gave l% lvhv/9 with results given in Table... 

Fig. 4 Fresnel factors calculated for ssp- and sps-polarization at (a, c) fused quartz/air interface and (b, d) fused quartz/water interface, respectively, as function of incident angle for visible beam (ru is, 800 nm). The incident angle for IR beam (roiR, 3300 nm) is fixed at 50°.

In the case of linear spectroscopic methods such as FTIR, attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) has been used to enhance the sensitivity of these methods [38-40]. In a similar fashion, a total internal reflection geometry has been used here to enhance the otherwise weak sum-frequency (SF) response from the liquid/liquid interface. In addition to a strong resonant contribution from the C-H stretching vibrations within the molecules, the intensity is also dependent upon the Fresnel factors for the input fields, /i, and the outgoing SF, fsp, as shown in Eq. (1). When the incident beams are directed on the interface at their respective critical angles, an enhancement of several orders of magnitude in the SF response is achievable over that of an external reflection geometry [25,35,36,41-43]. 

Problem 6.3. One would expect to see a very weak SHG intensity at both grazing and normal incidence and a maximum in between, the position of which is defermined by fhe relevant Fresnel factors. 

The reflectivity is given by the Fresnel factors that relate the reflected light and transmitted light to the incoming field E as described in Ref. 23 ... 

---