Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Free-radical reactions directive influences

The reactive intermediates mentioned above are initially ions and excited molecules and subsequently may be free radicals. Many ions are probably formed on irradiating PET, as judged by the large concentration of spins detected at —196°C. by electron spin resonance (ESR), but nothing is known directly about their chemical structure or reactivity. Any chemical role of excited molecules is equally a matter of conjecture. In these circumstances, the influence of dose rate will be discussed by reference to free radicals. Eventually, when more quantitative experimental data are obtained, the adequacy of free radical reactions may be better assessed, and the role of ions and excited molecules brought into perspective. [Pg.144]

Free radical reactions have been observed to influence molecular and biochemical processes and to directly cause some of the changes observed in cells during differentiation, ageing, and transformation (Abate et al. 1990, Sohal and Allen 1990, Allen and Tresinii 2000). [Pg.12]

The usual directive influences are not operative in this and similar reactions for ortho - para substitution occurs (this may be modified by steric hindrance) irrespective of the nature of R in the aromatic liquid CsHjR, e.g. phenyldlazo hydroxide and nitrobenzene yield 4-nitrodiphenyl this supports the assumption that neutral free radicals are formed. [Pg.928]

Case 1 appears to accurately predict the observed dependence on persulfate concentration. Furthermore, as [Q]+otal approaches [KX], the polymerization rate tends to become independent of quat salt concentration, thus qualitatively explaining the relative insensitivity to [Aliquat 336]. The major problem lies in explaining the observed dependency on [MMA]. There are a number of circumstances in free radical polymerizations under which the order in monomer concentration becomes >1 (18). This may occur, for example, if the rate of initiation is dependent upon monomer concentration. A particular case of this type occurs when the initiator efficiency varies directly with [M], leading to Rp a [M]. Such a situation may exist under our polymerization conditions. In earlier studies on the decomposition of aqueous solutions of potassium persulfate in the presence of 18-crown-6 we showed (19) that the crown entered into redox reactions with persulfate (Scheme 3). Crematy (16) has postulated similar reactions with quat salts. Competition between MMA and the quat salt thus could influence the initiation rate. In addition, increases in solution polarity with increasing [MMA] are expected to exert some, although perhaps minor, effect on Rp. Further studies are obviously necessary to fully understand these polymerization systems. [Pg.124]

In support of the free radical mechanism is the observation that the usual directive influences are not operative in these reactions. Substitution usually takes place para and ortho to the substituent in the benzene ring, irrespective of the nature of the groups. Even with nitrobenzene, para and ortho derivatives are formed. Thus, N-nitrosoacetanilide and nitrobenzene give 2- and 4-nitrobiphenyl. [Pg.229]

Under the influence of heat, free radicals, or radiation the yield of copolymer is increased, and the yield of adduct is decreased (19). This is analogous to the diene-maleic anhydride interaction in the existence of a common intermediate in both adduct and copolymer formation. However, in the Diels-Alder case adduct formation occurs so readily that the copolymer does not normally accompany the adduct. When the intermediate complex is exposed to radiation, both copolymer and adduct are formed (81). The direct analogy of the diene-sulfur dioxide reaction to the diene-maleic anhydride reaction is the greater than 75% cis-1,4 unsaturation of the copolymer in both cases. [Pg.121]

The first method is more perspective, as stabilizers may inhibit destruction reaction may directly influence the mechanism of destruction with the purpose of decreasing undesirable products yield and so on. It is supposed that stabilizers may act by means of 1) blocking of active centres (weak bonds) 2) filtration of ultra-violet radiation 3) breaking of peroxides 4) interaction with free radicals 5) suppression of excited states. [Pg.113]

An early report of the beneficial influence of 1,1-diphenylethylene (DPE) on the yields of alkylaryl ether obtained in the reaction of diaryliodonium salts with sodium alkoxides showed that radical chain reactions compete efficiently with the 0-arylation reaction. By contrast, addition of diphenylpicrylhydrazyl, a stable free radical species, had no significant influence on the yields of products obtained in e absence of additives. In this case, the 0-arylation reaction was considered to be a direct nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction, without the involvement of any transient covalent intermediate. (Table 2.11)... [Pg.39]

Aldehydes are emitted directly into the atmosphere from a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources and are also formed in situ from the atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The atmospheric fate of aldehydes is controlled by photolysis and reaction with hydroxyl (OH) or nitrate (NO3) radicals and, in the case of unsaturated compounds, reaction with ozone (Atkinson, 1994). The photolysis of aldehydes is of particular importance because it is a source of free radicals in the troposphere, and thus may significantly influence the oxidizing capacity of the lower atmosphere (Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts, 1986). [Pg.111]

The complex phenomena associated with the interaction of ionizing radiation with diverse liquids and solids, addressed in detail elsewhere in this book, are relevant and applicable to irradiated chilled or frozen foods. Specific influences of the food composition and structure directly affect the nature and reaction of the resulting free radicals formed [1]. Irradiation parameters and conditions further affect the reaction pathways of the radicals and the yield of stable products derived from them [2, 3]. [Pg.706]


See other pages where Free-radical reactions directive influences is mentioned: [Pg.322]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.869]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.1901]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.911]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.765]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.700]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.142 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.142 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.142 ]




SEARCH



Direct reactions

Directed reactions

Directing influence

Free radical reaction

Influence, directive

Radicals free-radical reactions

Reaction direct reactions

Reaction direction

© 2024 chempedia.info