Four-coordinate structures complexes

The value of the tris(pyrazolyl)hydroborato complexes [TpRR ]ZnOH is that they are rare examples of monomeric four-coordinate zinc complexes with a terminal hydroxide funtionality. Indeed, [TpBut]ZnOH is the first structurally characterized monomeric terminal hydroxide complex of zinc (149). As such, the monomeric zinc hydroxide complexes [TpRR ]ZnOH may be expected to play valuable roles as both structural and functional models for the active site of carbonic anhydrase. Although a limitation of the [TpRR ]ZnOH system resides with their poor solubility in water, studies on these complexes in organic solvents... 

The four-coordinate homoleptic complexes [Ag(EPh3)4]+ (E = P, As, Sb) have been characterized structurally with several anions for PPh3, with N03-,664 rSnPh2(N03)2(Cl,N03)]- (disordered distribution between Cl and NOD,679 C104, 680 PF<, , 682 and BPh4 683 for AsPh3, with... 

Vinylboronates are generally less reactive than vinylzirconocenes towards various electrophiles and hence selective reactions of the latter should be possible. It was found that selective cleavage of the carbon—zirconium bond in 45 by N-halosuccinimides provides (a-haloalkenyl)boronic esters 53 in excellent chemical yields and with complete re-gioselectivity (Scheme 7.17) [54], An X-ray crystal structure determination of 45 confirmed the configuration of the four-coordinate Zr complex, with two cyclopentadienyl rings, Cl, and C(sp2) as the four ligands (Fig. 7.5) [54,126]. 

The four-coordinate amine complexes are very stable to oxidation 34,143 they do not react with I2 and undergo only monosubstitution upon treatment with Br2 (equation 26). Monohalo-genation of bisamine complexes of the [H2BLL ]+ type affords cations containing chiral boron 34,148 the [XHB(NMe3)4-Mepy]+ (X = Cl, Br) cations were resolved149 into enantiomers. The crystal structure for X = Br has been reported.150... 

Copper and nickel complexes of the tridentate l-(2-carboxyphenyl)-3,5-diphenyl- (169 X = C02 R = R = Ph) and 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3,5-diphenyl-(169 X = 0 R = R = Ph) formazans were prepared118 by the interaction of the formazan and the appropriate metal acetate in alcohol and were assigned the three-coordinate structures (170 X = O, C02 R = R = Ph M = Ni, Cu) since the diamagnetic nickel complexes were found to be unimolecular in benzene solution. Treatment of the nickel complex (170 X = O, R = R = Ph M = Ni) with pyridine gave a violet crystalline adduct which was assigned the four-coordinate structure (171 X = O R = R = Ph M = Ni). A product similar to the latter could not be obtained from the nickel complex of l-(2-carboxyphenyl)-3,5-diphenylformazan but nickel complexes of this type were obtained from both l-(2-hydroxyphenyl)- (169 X = O, R = CN R = Ph) and l-(2-carboxyphenyl)- (169 X = C02 R = CN R = Ph) 3-cyano-5-phenylformazans. In all three cases a considerable shade change occurred on going from the three-coordinate complex to the pyridine adduct. 

Since the copper complexes, [Cu(NN)2]+ and [Cu(NN)(PR3)2]+ (NN = 1,10-phenanthroline, 2,2 -bipyridine, and their derivatives) were applied to stoichiometric and catalytic photoreduction of cobalt(III) complexes [8a,b,e,9a,d], one can expect to perform the asymmetric photoreduction system with the similar copper(l) complexes if the optically active center is introduced into the copper(I) complex. To construct such an asymmetric photoreaction system, we need chiral copper(I) complex. Copper complex, however, takes a four-coordinate structure. This means that the molecular asymmetry around the metal center cannot exist in the copper complex, unlike in six-coordinate octahedral ruthenium(II) complexes. Thus we need to synthesize some chiral ligand in the copper complexes. 

ESMS has been used to characterize the intermediate Nin-complexes formed in the coupling reaction of 2-bromo-6-methylpyridine in the presence of Raney nickel (Scheme 1) [45]. The composition of the intermediate had already been determined previously by elemental analysis, but the ES mass spectra, showing a strong peak for the ion [Ni2(dmbp)2Br3]+, pointed to a dimeric structure. It was concluded that this ion was formed by the loss of Br from the dimeric structure 1. An alternative explanation is that the intermediate has the more common four-coordinate structure 2, and that the observed peak was due to the ion-paired species [Ni2(dmbp)2Br2]2++Br. The dimeric nature of the intermediate was confirmed by a cross experiment when mixtures of differently substituted pyridines were reacted, mixed ligand dinickel species were observed in the ES mass spectra. 

These complexes can be prepared from phosphorus ligands that are themselves substituted by electron-withdrawing groups. It is often beneficial, however, to employ a low ratio of phosphorus ligand to rhodium since in several instances excess ligand cleaves the halo bridges and forms four-coordinate monomeric complexes. Table 2 lists those complexes of this structure that have been isolated. 

Although a number of factors influence the number of ligands bonded to a metal and the shapes of the resulting species, in some cases we can predict which structure is favored from the electronic structure of the complex. For example, two four-coordinate structures are possible, tetrahedral and square planar. Some metals, such as Pt(II), form almost exclusively square-planar complexes. Others, such as Ni(II) and Cu(II), exhibit both structures, depending on the ligands. Subtle differences in electronic structure, described later in this chapter, help to explain these differences. 

---