Forward and backward transformations

These bounds are the nonequilibrium equivalents of the Gibbs-Bogoliubov bounds discussed in Chap. 2. Having the free energy now bounded from above and below already demonstrates the power of using both forward and backward transformations. Moreover, as was shown by Crooks [18, 19], the distribution of work values from forward and backward paths satisfies a relation that is central to histogram methods in free energy calculations... 

In Figure 3.12, the results of forward and backward transformations of a spectrum are demonstrated. Even if only half of the original 32 coefficients are used, that is, the 16 most important ones, the original data are quite well reproduced. In the case of back transformation with only few coefficients, the different basis functions of the two transformations can be easily recognized, that is, for FT, the trigonometric and for HT, the Walsh function. 

The potential parameters used in the present calculations are identical to those in [18]. The ion interacts via electrostatic and Lennard-Jones terms, Vjj= - 332Qjgi/rjj + AjAj/r f - BjBj/rfj, where the subscript / denotes the ion and j is another atom with which it interacts. In order to calibrate the calculated hydration energies for different ions versus the non-bonded parameters, we first carry out FEP/MD simulations of a solvated ion in water. In these calculations, the Lennard-Jones parameters of the ion were gradually changed from (X , B ) = (2340.0,25.0) to (/4, B ) = (5.0,1.0). The calibration calculations in water covered a total simulation time of 40 ps for both the forward and backward transformation direction. 

Equations (40.3) and (40.4) are called the Fourier transform pair. Equation (40.3) represents the transform from the frequency domain back to the time domain, and eq. (40.4) is the forward transform from the time domain to the frequency domain. A closer look at eqs. (40.3) and (40.4) reveals that the forward and backward Fourier transforms are equivalent, except for the sign in the exponent. The backward transform is a summation because the frequency domain is discrete for finite measurement times. However, for infinite measurement times this summation becomes an integral. 

The expressions for the forward and backward Fourier transforms of a data array of 2N+ 1 data points with the origin in the centre point are [3] ... 

Fig. 5.2. Distribution of the work accumulated when transforming the potential surface from A = 0 to 1 during a time t = 1. The solid and dashed lines show the distribution of the work along the forward and backward paths, respectively. The work distribution for backward paths was multiplied by exp(—f3W). The distributions are plotted on a semi-logarithmic scale...

Most switching devices studied make use of light for interconverting a molecule between two different states. Both forward and backward processes may be photo-induced or one of them, usually the reverse transformation, may be thermal. 

Linearization methods start from a path integral representation of the forward and backward propagators in expressions for time correlation function, and combine them to describe the overall time evolution of the system in terms of a set of classical trajectories whose initial conditions are sampled from a quantity related to the Wigner transform of the quantum density operator. The linearized expression for a correlation function provides a powerful tool for describing systems in the condensed phase. The rapid decay of... 

This form of the general Jacobian element allows for the straightforward solution of the SSOZ equation for molecules of arbitrary symmetry. However, in the numerical solution using Gillan s methods, most of the computation time is involved in calculating the elements of the Jacobian matrix, rather than in the calculation of its inverse or in the calculation of transforms. Indeed, as the forward and backward Fourier transforms can be carried out using a fast Fourier transform routine, the time-limiting step is the double summation over / and j in Eq. (4.3.36). With this restriction in mind, it is... 

Because of the principle of microscopic reversibility each molecular process (in contrast to a macroscopic process) may occur in both forward and backward directions. As a consequence the end product P of an enzymatic conversion can act as a competitive inhibitor of the enzyme or, depending on the thermodynamic equilibrium, be transformed to the substrate S. If the interconversion of the ES to the EP complex is the rate-determining step the rapid equilibrium assumption is valid and the rate equation can be derived easily. 

As always, the current is proportional to the difference between the rates of the forward and backward reactions. In transform space. 

As all steps (equilibria) are reversible (forwards and backwards) and catalized by proton (involving protonations and deprotonations), the complicated reaction matrix involves in the natural series 48 aglucones, 92 equilibria and 368 elementary steps, in the dihydro series 24 aglucones, 40 equilibria and 160 elementary steps. Although any of these structures and transformations can not be excluded, by graph analysis the shortest rational pathways were found for the interpretation of the events. The results could be used for the investigation of other cases in the bioorganic chemistry of indole and related alkaloids, too (see later). 

In equilibrium, neither the forward reaction nor the backward reaction takes place spontaneously. Macroscopically speaking, there is no more transformation and the composition of the reaction mixture remains constant However, forward and backward reactions do continue to occur at the microscopic level between the particles. These happen at identical rates though, so that the transformations in the two directions compensate for each other. In this case, one speaks traditionally of a dynamic equilibrium, an equality of forward and backward forces although one means a kinetic equilibrium, an equality of forward and backward reaction rates. We will go into this in more detail later on in Sect. 17.2. 

Fig. 57. Convolutive and deconvolutive transformations of current transients for reversible systems. Solution of 1 x 10 M Cd in 0.11 M KCl 1 and 1 forward and backward linear sweep curves, 0.2Vs" 2 and 2 semiintegral curves (convolution vs. time) 3 and 3 semidifferential curves (deconvolution vs. potential). Dimensionless variable y results in particulate operations. Adapted according to [123].

There is one sure way to know whether or not you have mastered a mechanism forwards and backwards—you should try to actually draw the mechanism backwards. That s right, backwards. For example, draw a mechanism for the following transformation. Make sure to first read the advice below before attempting to draw a mechanism. 

The A/X branching ratio is obtained from the translational spectrum (see Fig. 1 of Ref. 55) after lab -> CM transformation [58]. The result is (28a) (28b) = 1 0.25, a surprisingly hi CL yield. Apparently formation of A-state product is facilitated by the existence of an adiabatic pathway for (28b) [56], a rather exceptional circumstance. Details of this path were elucidated by another scattering experiment on + H2 where even very slow product ions, corresponding to CM backwards scattering, could be observed [59]. From the resolved velocity groups it was found that, at =1-6 eV, the A-state product was symmetrically distributed between forward and backward hemispheres, while X state ions exhibited some forward asymmetry. Apparently both reaction paths involve a bound complex. In fact, ab initio calculations of the A" surface for (28b) have shown a deep (several eV) well. The adiabatic surface for (28a) is much more complicated [60]. 

There are two main ideas in the foundation of classical chemical thermodynamics and in chemical kinetics the notion of dynamic equilibrium and the law of mass action. Historically, formulating the mass action law Van t Hoff proposed that the reaction rate was determined by the concentrations of reacting molecules [5]. The elementary acts of chemical transformations in forward and backward reactions can proceed independently. According to the notion of dynamic equilibrium, the chemical equilibrium is established when the rates of forward and backward reactions become equal. 

Let us now consider the physical meaning of the kinetically introduced equilibrium constant, (2.4), and its connection with an equilibrium constant, Kgq, obtained within the frame of conventional equilibrium chemical thermodynamics. The equilibrium constant, X q, has been introduced above as the ratio of forward and backward rate constants and, in principle, can also be determined experimentally by measuring the corresponding equilibrium concentrations of the reagents, (2.4). In contrast to this kinetic approach, which tacitly implies the mechanism initiating the chemical transformation, the thermodynamic description of chemical reactions does not consider the reaction mechanism, nor does the pathway of reaching one or another state of the system. The classical thermodynamic approach to the description of chemical reactions, as well as to the kinetic approach, was also developed by Van t Hoff at the close of the nineteenth century [5]. The... 

---