Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Formation measurable rise time

The moving-drop method [2] employs a column of one liquid phase through which drops of a second liquid either rise or fall. The drops are produced at a nozzle situated at one end of the column and collected at the other end. The contact time and size of the drop are measurable. Three regimes of mass transport need to be considered drop formation, free rise (or fall) and drop coalescence. The solution in the liquid column phase or drop phase (after contact) may be analyzed to determine the total mass transferred, which may be related to the interfacial reaction only after mass transfer rates have been determined. [Pg.342]

This fact has lead to investigations of transient laser irradiation. This is obtained by chopping the laser beam with a rotating wheel at a frequency of 1 kHz. It is observed that the rise time of Ir is of the order of a few hundred microseconds while 13 follows closely the laser irradiation. It is possible to show that the initial dip/dt is related to the time constant of CsH formation, because CsH molecules have a very short lifetime and because diffusion does not play an important role at the very beginning of the laser irradiation. Thus the risetime constant x = Ip (dIp/dt)" is assigned to [CsH] (d[CsH]/dt)" and has been measured under various experimental conditions ([Cs], [Hz]). We have derived from these measurements the quantity k = ([Cs(7P)] [Hz])" d[CsH]/dt = (x[H2]) [CsH]/[Cs(7P)] which represents the rate of CsH formation according to the global reaction (2). This rate coefficient has been found to be independent of both [Cs(7P)] and... [Pg.259]

It has been shown that in a three-level system composed of an excited state, an intermediate charge-separated state, and the system ground state, the observed rise and decay time constants of the intermediate state are not necessarily the formation and decay time constants, respectively, of the intermediate (27). In fact, the smaller of the true formation or decay time constants will always be the observed rise time constant of the intermediate, and the longer of the true formation or decay constants will be the observed decay time of the intermediate. This ambiguity is lifted by fluorescence lifetime measurements. As a general rule, the fluorescence lifetime will match either the observed rise or decay time of the transient absorption associated with the intermediate, and represents the true formation time of the intermediate. [Pg.190]

Figure 4 shows the results of the kinetic tests on asphaltene films, where the variation in surface pressure is measured against time while the area is kept constant. The f]—t curves for asphaltenes spread from 20%/80% toluene/hexane are markedly different from the H— curves for asphaltenes spread from pure toluene. Asphaltenes spread from solvents containing less than 20% toluene give rise to an increase in surface pressure with increasing bulk concentration of asphaltenes (Fig. 4). Amul-tilayer structure may exist on the surface when the solvent contains less toluene (< 20%). When the amount of toluene in the spreading solvent is high, even 8mg/ml asphaltenes may be dissolved, and no change in the surface pressure is observed. This may be explained as a result of the asphaltene fraction being dissolved in the aromatic solvent, preventing formation of a multilayer. Figure 4 shows the results of the kinetic tests on asphaltene films, where the variation in surface pressure is measured against time while the area is kept constant. The f]—t curves for asphaltenes spread from 20%/80% toluene/hexane are markedly different from the H— curves for asphaltenes spread from pure toluene. Asphaltenes spread from solvents containing less than 20% toluene give rise to an increase in surface pressure with increasing bulk concentration of asphaltenes (Fig. 4). Amul-tilayer structure may exist on the surface when the solvent contains less toluene (< 20%). When the amount of toluene in the spreading solvent is high, even 8mg/ml asphaltenes may be dissolved, and no change in the surface pressure is observed. This may be explained as a result of the asphaltene fraction being dissolved in the aromatic solvent, preventing formation of a multilayer.
Further acceptor components (in addition to F and Fg) can be pre-reduced, if the sample is exposed to continuous illumination in the presence of Na2S204 at pH 10. Setif and Bottin (8) concluded that, when Fx becomes reduced, the pair P700 A2 recombines to the triplet state P700 with a yield close to 1 and with tj /2 750 ns (in PS I from Syne-chocystis). Essentially the same results were obtained here for Synechococcus, except that the rise time of P700 formation is in the order of 200 ns (measured at 1064 nm ... [Pg.1586]

Two other possible problems were discussed in [50]. First, the thickness resonance of 24 MHz has the potential of causing errors in the measmement of rise time and peak compressional pressure, a situation dealt with theoretically in [63]. However, a comparison check with an 18 pm thick bilaminar hydrophone showed no significant differences for a rise time of approximately 30 ns and peak pressure of 40 MPa. The second problem was the aforementioned issue of hydrophone damage in the form of pitting of the metal electrodes and leads, attributed to the action of cavitation in the water measmement medium. While the performance of the hydrophone was not affected during the comse of the study, it was concluded that eventually the hydrophone would have failed. Regarding cavitation, it has been noted that measurement of the negative pressme portion of the lithotripsy pulse may be affected by bubble formation at the smface of the hydrophone [62, 64]. [Pg.375]

Fig. 11. Transient absorption kinetics. Open symbols are measured data, curves are fits, and instrument responses are represented by dotted curves a) SE decay probed at 600 nm b) excited state evolution ( MLCT—> MLCT) probed at 690 nm c) formation of the triplet state at 1050 nm the data are well fitted with rise times of 30 5 fs (for RuN3-TiO triangles) and 70 15 fs (for RuN3-EtOH squares) d) early-time transient absorption kinetics of oxidized RuN3 cation-Ti02 measured at 860 nm parameters of the fit are given in the caption of Figure 10. Fig. 11. Transient absorption kinetics. Open symbols are measured data, curves are fits, and instrument responses are represented by dotted curves a) SE decay probed at 600 nm b) excited state evolution ( MLCT—> MLCT) probed at 690 nm c) formation of the triplet state at 1050 nm the data are well fitted with rise times of 30 5 fs (for RuN3-TiO triangles) and 70 15 fs (for RuN3-EtOH squares) d) early-time transient absorption kinetics of oxidized RuN3 cation-Ti02 measured at 860 nm parameters of the fit are given in the caption of Figure 10.
Sonication of 0.05 M Hg2(N03)2 solution for 10,20 and 30 min and the simultaneous measurements of conductivity, temperature change and turbidity (Table 9.2) indicated a rise in the turbidity due to the formation of an insoluble precipitate. This could probably be due to the formation of Hg2(OH)2, as a consequence of hydrolysis, along with Hg free radical and Hg° particles which could be responsible for increase in the turbidity after sonication. The turbidity increased further with time. Mobility of NO3 ions was more or less restricted due to resonance in this ion, which helped, in the smooth and uniform distribution of charge density over NO3 ion surface. Hence the contribution of NOJ ion towards the electrical conductance was perhaps much too less than the conduction of cationic species with which it was associated in the molecular (compound) form. Since in case of Hg2(N03)2, Hg2(OH)2 species were being formed which also destroyed the cationic nature of Hg22+, therefore a decrease in the electrical conductance of solution could be predicted. The simultaneous passivity of its anionic part did not increase the conductivity due to rise in temperature as anticipated and could be seen through the Table 9.2. These observations could now be summarized in reaction steps as under ... [Pg.225]


See other pages where Formation measurable rise time is mentioned: [Pg.176]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.2768]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.334]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.175 ]




SEARCH



Formation measurements

Formation time

Measuring time

Rise time

Time measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info