FLUIDIZED-BED CATALYTIC MEMBRANE TUBULAR REACTORS

A fixed-bed reactor often suffers from a substantially small effectiveness factor (e.g., 10 to 10 for a fixed-bed steam reformer according to Soliman et al. [1988]) due to severe diffusional limitations unless very small particles are used. The associated high pressure drop with the use of small particles can be prohibitive. A feasible alternative is to employ a fluidized bed of catalyst powders. The effectiveness factor in the fluidized bed configuration approaches unity. The fluidization system also provides a thermally stable operation without localized hot spots. The large solid (catalyst) surface area for gas contact promotes effective catalytic reactions. For certain reactions such as ethylbenzene dehydrogenation, however, a fluidized bed operation may not be superior to a fixed bed operation. To further improve the efficiency and compactness of a fluidized-bed reactor, a permselective membrane has been introduced by Adris et al. [1991] for steam reforming of methane and Abdalla and Elnashaie [1995] for catalytic dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene. 

Due to their complexity, the model equations will not be derived or presented here. Details can be found elsewhere [Adris, 1994 Abdalla and Elnashaie, 1995]. Basically mass and heat balances arc performed for the dense and bubble phases. It is noted that associated reaction terms need to be included in those equations for the dense phase but not for the bubble phase. Hydrogen permeation, the rate of which follows Equation (10-51b) with n=0.5, is accounted for in the mass balance for the dense phase. Hydrodynamic parameters important to the fluidized bed reactor operation include minimum fluidization velocity, bed porosity at minimum fluidization, average bubble diameter, bubble rising velocity and volume fraction of bubbles in the fluidized bed. The equations used for estimating these and other hydrodynamic parameters are taken from various established sources in the fluidized bed literature and have been given by Abdalla and Elnashaie [1995]. 

The overall mass and heat interphasc exchange coefficients can be obtained by summing the resistances from bubble to cloud and from cloud to emulsion (dense phase) in series. The overall bed to surface heat transfer coefficient is assumed to be mostly atuibuted to 

The resulting equations describing mass and heat transport are highly non-linear algebraic equations which can be solved numerically using a common procedure such as the Newton-Raphson technique. 

The Pd membrane tubes are positioned above a certain height from the gas distributor so that they are immersed in a gas mixture containing a considerable amount of hydrogen produced from the following reactions  

---