Flows mainstream

In the previous chapters, I have discussed what may be thought of as mainstream applications of flow technology. Cells stained for surface and intracellular antigens and nuclei stained for DNA content together constitute a large majority of the particles that flow through the world s cytometers. As noted in the Preface, however, flow cytometry has continued to surprise everyone with its utility in unusual and unpredicted fields of endeavor. By the time this book appears in print, some new applications will almost certainly have progressed into the flow mainstream and other newer applications will have taken their place in the tributaries (is it time to kill this metaphor ). 

Filtration of viscose is not a straightforward chemical engineering process. The solution of cellulose xanthate contains some easy-to-deal-with undissolved pulp fibers, but also some gel-like material which is retarded rather than removed by the filters. The viscose is unstable and tends to form more gel as it ages. Its flow characteristics make the material close to the walls of any vessel or pipe move more slowly, get older, and gel more than the mainstream viscose. So while filtration can hold back gels arising from incomplete mixing, new gels can form in the pipework after the filters. 

Immersed Bodies When flow occurs over immersed bodies such that the boundaiy layer is completely laminar over the whole body, laminar flow is said to exist even though the flow in the mainstream is turbulent. The following reladonships are apphcable to single bodies immersed in an infinite flmd and are not valid for a.s.semhlage.s of bodies. 

This is pressure drop (including friction loss) between run and branch, based on velocity in the mainstream before branching. Actual value depends on the flow split, ranging from 0.5 to 1.3 if mainstream enters run and from 0.7 to 1.5 if mainstream enters branch. 

A situation which is frequently encountered in tire production of microelectronic devices is when vapour deposition must be made into a re-entrant cavity in an otherwise planar surface. Clearly, the gas velocity of the major transporting gas must be reduced in the gas phase entering the cavity, and transport down tire cavity will be mainly by diffusion. If the mainstream gas velocity is high, there exists the possibility of turbulent flow at tire mouth of tire cavity, but since this is rare in vapour deposition processes, the assumption that the gas widrin dre cavity is stagnant is a good approximation. The appropriate solution of dre diffusion equation for the steady-state transport of material tlrrough the stagnant layer in dre cavity is... 

In the first mixing process, the entry mainstream flow ( + ip) mixes with cooling flow dip drawn from the compressor at temperature r -omp. Thus, if Cp is constant, then... 

Fig. 4.8 shows the open cooling process in a blade row diagrammatically. The heat transfer Q, between the hot mainstream (g) and the cooling air (c) inside the blades, takes place from control surface A to control surface B, i.e. from the mainstream (between combustion outlet state 3g and state Xg), to the coolant (between compressor outlet state 2c and state Xc). The injection and mixing processes occur within control surface C (between states Xg and Xc and a common fully mixed state 5m, the rotor inlet state). The flows through A plus B and C are adiabatic in the sense that no heat is lost to the environment outside these control surfaces thus the entire process (A + B + C) is adiabatic. We wish to determine the mixed out conditions downstream at station 5m. 

The total enthalpy change across the whole (stationary) cooled blade row is straightforward and is obtained for the overall process (i.e. the complete adiabatic flow through control surfaces (A + B) plus (C)). Even though there is a heat transfer Q internally between the unit mainstream flow and the cooling air flow i//, from A to B, the overall process is adiabatic. 

In the simplified a/s analysis of Section 4.2 we assumed identical and constant specific heats for the two streams. Now we assume semi-perfect gases with specific heats as functions of temperature but we must also allow for the difference in gas properties between the cooling air and the mainstream gas (combustion products). Between entry states (mainstream gas 3g, and cooling air, 2c) and exit state 5m (mixed out), the steady flow energy equation, for the flow through control surfaces (A + B) and C, yields, for a stationary blade row,... 

In the simple approach, the change po due to Q (the first term in Eiq. (4.42)) is usually ignored for both streams. The change of po due to frictional effects in the mainstream flow is usually included in the basic polytropic efficiency (rjp) of the uncooled flow, so that... 

Here A5inicrn.ii is the entropy increase of the cooling fluid in control surface B due to friction and the heat transfer (Q, in), A5,nu,iii is the entropy created in the metal between the mainstream and the coolant (or metal plus thermal barrier coating if present) due to temperature difference across it, A uxiemai is the entropy increase in the mainstream flow within control surface A before mixing due to heat transfer (Q, out), plus the various entropy increases due to the mixing process itself in control surface C. 

The method devised by Holland and Thake [ 1 ] for estimating the cooling air (vv, ), as a fraction of mainstream entry flow to a blade row (vvg), i.e. tp = wjw, was described by Horlock et al. [2] and is reproduced in Appendix A Fig. A. 1 shows diagrammatically the notation employed there and the same symbols are defined and used below. 

Consider first a convectively cooled blade row (Fig. A.la). It is. shown in Appendix A that the mass flow of cooling air (vv. ) required for a mass flow of mainstream gas (Wg), entering at temperature Tg, is given by... 

The design of a cross-flow filter system employs an inertial filter principle that allows the permeate or filtrate to flow radially through the porous media at a relatively low face velocity compared to that of the mainstream slurry flow in the axial direction, as shown schematically in Figure 15.1.9 Particles entrained in the high-velocity axial flow field are prevented from entering the porous media by the ballistic effect of particle inertia. It has been suggested that submicron particles penetrate the filter medium and form a dynamic membrane or submicron layer, as shown in... 

Questions regarding applicability of particular technologies to particular applications must, of course, be resolved eventually. However, mainstream focus has been on achieving adequate TFT device and circuit performance to support the control, computation, and communication functions for a wide range of potential applications. As satisfactory electrical circuit performance is attained for additional functionality, questions that relate to the quality of other device types, their integration into an overall process flow, and perhaps most importantly, the robustness and stability of the final product, will receive much more attention.86-88... 

The Ebro headwater tributaries still have a natural flow regime [16], whereas the fluvial regimes of the main tributaries reaching the Ebro mainstream in the central and lower part of the catchment (Segre, Cinca, Gallego and Aragon rivers) are slightly to moderately altered. 

At the same time, reaction modeling is now commonly coupled to the problem of mass transport in groundwater flows, producing a subfield known as reactive transport modeling. Whereas a decade ago such modeling was the domain of specialists, improvements in mathematical formulations and the development of more accessible software codes have thrust it squarely into the mainstream. 

Injection from tube-micropylons at an angle of 45° relative to the mainstream air flow direction provided greater mixing and combustion efficiencies in comparison to co-flow injection from fin-pylons. 

Fig. 13.8 shows typical erosive buming-rate data for a nitropolymer propellant. The propellant is composed of nc((1-504), q(0.36G), and dep(0.130). The burning rate increases with increasing mainstream velocity, u, or with increasing mass velocity, G, when Ug is increased beyond about 100 m s h The burning rate remains unchanged when the flow velocity is below 100 m s"k The experimental data are correlated with a = 0.8 X 10 m - kg-o.8g-o.2 p 270 for a distance from the fore-end... 

There is a minor anomaly in the retention-ume distribution curve in Fig. 6. starling at r 1.2tp. This is caused by a small amount of liquid following a second flow path longer than the mainstream flow. This minor flowstream probably exited the upper spreader through the vent and then used the dead space for separation purposes, reducing the inactive volume of this vessel. 

---